The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. - Page 202 - Politics and Economics

I still don't see how this is going to work. Who's going to invade? US soldiers who are currently in a 14 year war in Afghanistan and just getting out of Iraq? Who's going to lead the new government? Not the hardliners, and not the more liberal Iranians who might like Americans but are nationalists and would fight just as hard as the hardliners any invasion. You're going to either have a total war or an occupation, neither of which the US really has the chops for.

We missed our "Arab Spring" moment with the more liberal modern Iranians. Maybe we get another one?

02-03-2017 , 01:28 PM

#5027

SuperUberBob

Not interesting enough

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 48,217

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl

You're thinking like an intelligent person.

Try thinking like Donald Trump.

02-03-2017 , 01:29 PM

#5028

RV Life

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 1,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by raradevils

They also happen to be one of the biglyest nations for sponsoring terrorism. This also goes back to the hostage crisis of the 70's.

Like the power elite gives a **** about that.

There's only one reason they have a hard on about Iran. Oil. That's it. Because oil=$.

02-03-2017 , 01:29 PM

#5029

microbet

Solar Powered

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 57,077

Quote:

Originally Posted by raradevils

Hezbollah and Hamas, neither are for peace.

Hezbollah is a little different because it's kind of the Iranian government acting in Lebanon (I think), but Hamas is not for peace in the same way the Israeli government is not for peace. It should not be presupposed that peace cannot be made with Hamas and agreements should not be precluded on its elimination. It shouldn't be treated like Al Queda.

02-03-2017 , 01:30 PM

#5030

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

02-03-2017 , 01:31 PM

#5031

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

02-03-2017 , 01:32 PM

#5032

RV Life

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 1,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by raradevils

not my words:

"State Department report finds Iran is top state sponsor of terror"

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/02/politi...ort-terrorism/

"On Iran, the report said that country "remained the foremost state sponsor of terrorism in 2015, providing a range of support, including financial, training, and equipment, to groups around the world.""

LOL. Yea but let's be honest. That's what you were talking about. You don't give a **** about a terrorist attack in some random country on the other side of the world.

02-03-2017 , 01:33 PM

#5033

champstark

aka starkwired

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 14,838

Quote:

Originally Posted by microbet

Not sure I 100% agree with all of your assertions here, but the main point that it's ridiculous to lump Hezbollah/Hamas/Iran in together is an important one that I (unfortunately) am pretty certain the Trump administration has no clue about.

02-03-2017 , 01:34 PM

#5034

yeSpiff

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,313

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperUberBob

You're thinking like an intelligent person.

Try thinking like Donald Trump.

post count numbers is fake

02-03-2017 , 01:39 PM

#5035

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

What's it called when the executive branch spontaneously destroys the legal residency status of over 100,000 people in one day?

I don't think the words "travel ban" really do it justice. Come on, media, you can do better.

02-03-2017 , 01:39 PM

#5036

raradevils

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 8,189

Quote:

Originally Posted by RV Life

LOL. Yea but let's be honest. That's what you were talking about. You don't give a **** about a terrorist attack in some random country on the other side of the world.

No actually I do.

02-03-2017 , 01:40 PM

#5037

jayhawks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 6,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperUberBob

I'm more bothered by this:

I honestly have no idea what he's talking about.

I was skeptical of an invasion of Iran but now I don't know. Seems that he's hammering away on them for whatever reason.

Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism, afaik. I don't know if he means Iran is actually accumulating territory themselves or if the groups they are sponsoring are accumulating territory. If it's the latter, Trump is most likely correct. Ramadi, Mosul, ect...

02-03-2017 , 01:41 PM

#5038

DeroDeniro

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 1,273

Hezbollah is a kind of "homeland defense" organization. They don't go kill people in Paris or NYC. Israel attackedLebanon, they defended. Foreign powers came to the Lebanon in the '80s, they attacked them (right or wrong) because they felt that these powers were aggressors. The 80s were a **** show all around with everyone doing violent stuff in the Lebanon. Heck, Israel's complicity in the Sabra/Shatillah massacres resulted in more civilian deaths in one episode than Hezbollah has caused in 3 decades.

The one wrinkle is their involvement in Syria, which I think is a terrible departure for them.

02-03-2017 , 01:42 PM

#5039

master3004

Revisionist Historian

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 56,459

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riverman

Can't overstate how atrocious the TV media has been on this. I'm currently watching MSNBC and the PREMISE OF THE SEGMENT IS HOW KELLYANNE GOEBBLES SHOULD HANDLE HER MISTAKE.

THERE WAS NO MISTAKE YOU DUMB MOTHER****ERS

Write to them. Tell them you will take your viewership elsewhere of they refuse to report the news correctly

02-03-2017 , 01:45 PM

#5040

Dominic

Tripod

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 74,593

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rex Ingram

do you wanna grab her by the pussy?

Maybe dinner and a movie first?

02-03-2017 , 01:48 PM

#5041

Autocratic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 11,276

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayhawks

Worth noting that A. Iran is fighting against ISIS for ****'s sake and B. the power vacuum in Iraq is like, distinctly the result of Western interference.

02-03-2017 , 01:49 PM

#5042

Kukraprout

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 11,231

I'm not sure what problem you would be trying to solve by attacking Iran but they have nothing to do with ISIS, for example. They're not on the same side in the Shia vs Sunni war.

02-03-2017 , 01:49 PM

#5043

jayhawks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 6,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl

It would be ugly, worse than Iraq. This is why, in my opinion, the Iran nuclear deal was bad. By agreeing to reduce their nuclear development, Iran had their sanctions lifted which resulted in assets being unfrozen and oil revenues to increase. Where do you think a lot of the money is going?

02-03-2017 , 01:50 PM

#5044

raradevils

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 8,189

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeroDeniro

Hezbollah is a kind of "homeland defense" organization. They don't go kill people in Paris or NYC. Israel attackedLebanon, they defended. Foreign powers came to the Lebanon in the '80s, they attacked them (right or wrong) because they felt that these powers were aggressors. The 80s were a **** show all around with everyone doing violent stuff in the Lebanon. Heck, Israel's complicity in the Sabra/Shatillah massacres resulted in more civilian deaths in one episode than Hezbollah has caused in 3 decades.

The one wrinkle is their involvement in Syria, which I think is a terrible departure for them.

Can confirm this, I was there then at least in the early 80's.

02-03-2017 , 01:51 PM

#5045

microbet

Solar Powered

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 57,077

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kukraprout

There are some good pages in The Selfish Genes about evolution and game theory. Like, there is a Nash equilibrium where a certain percentage of a species end up being *******s and the others being nice because it's the optimal strategy for every individual.

Yeah, very interesting stuff. I've read The Selfish Gene and some more stuff that covered some lizard and fish species especially where there are multiple immensely different types of individuals.

02-03-2017 , 01:51 PM

#5046

raradevils

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 8,189

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autocratic

Worth noting that A. Iran is fighting against ISIS for ****'s sake and B. the power vacuum in Iraq is like, distinctly the result of Western interference.

could be said about most of the Middle East

02-03-2017 , 01:53 PM

#5047

microbet

Solar Powered

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 57,077

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayhawks

Modernizing and liberalizing their society. Large investments especially in tech startups. They are smart, educated people who want freedom and prosperity.

02-03-2017 , 01:54 PM

#5048

champstark

aka starkwired

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 14,838

Spicer just completely walked back everything on Israeli settlement policy Trump etc. have put forth so far.

02-03-2017 , 01:56 PM

#5049

einbert

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 14,911

http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/now...you-1791959502

Quote:

Today we have two widely expected pieces of financial lawmaking news from the Trump administration: Gary Cohn—who went directly from the president’s office at Goldman Sachs to take a job as Trump’s top financial advisor—says that the White House will begin plans for “scaling back” the Dodd-Frank law, which was Congress’s best attempt to make our financial system safer in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. On top of that, the Trump administration will also halt the implementation of the fiduciary rule, the purpose of which was to prevent financial advisers from ripping you off.

I am not exaggerating. The point of the fiduciary rule was that when you, the average person, go in to some financial adviser to learn what you should invest in for your retirement, you should be able to know that that advisor is recommending investments because they are good for you, and not because they are earning some kickback on the investment. In other words it protected consumers from predatory behavior from their hired financial experts. The one and only reason to roll back this rule is to allow people to once again be exploited by financial professionals—to allow them to make more money for themselves by costing you money. (Here https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/art...es-true-threat is a good explanation of why the objections to the fiduciary rule are dishonest bull****). It is extremely straightforward. The Trump administration has gained power and will now use that power to allow a small class of money people exploit everyone else. The Dodd-Frank rules are a bit more arcane, but the general reason for dismantling them is the same: to allow Wall Street to make more money. Our financial system is about to get both more dangerous and more exploitative. This is the outcome of the “blue collar billionaire” who fed people slogans about “Draining the Swamp” and then immediately turned over our government regulatory system to Wall Street insiders.

Regular people do not win from these actions. The rich win and you lose.

02-03-2017 , 01:56 PM

#5050

Chuck Bass

World's Most Interesting Procrastinator

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 9,484

So what exactly is Bannon's goal? All Bannon quotes seem to suggest that he just wants complete chaos. But surely he must have some ideology (beyond "white people are best") that he's going for? I understand he's trying to get rid of muslims within his own country's borders, making immigration to the States harder/impossible, etc. But what is he going for re: foreign politics? I keep reading quotes how he wants to break the EU, but why? What's his ultimate agenda?

Sorry if it's a stupid question, I just keep reading these scary quotes but never really seen his bottom line ideology explained.

Page 202 of 5382

First

2 102 152 182 192 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 212 222 252 302 402 702 1202

Last

...

Page 202 of 5382

First

2 102 152 182 192 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 212 222 252 302 402 702 1202

Last