I didn't say it was a good strategy. I'm just expecting his response to the charges Mueller brings will be a tweet saying "Then why did I sign a bill targeting Russia with the strongest sanctions in the history of forever #fakenews #witchhunt #clintondidit #givecomeysomepolonium #andmueller"

Remember when people were talking about how they were worried about illegal immigration and were fine with legal immigration? Buttahhhh
https://www.axios.com/trump-immigrat...468269885.html

In case you're wondering about Trump's continued ability to shatter the space-time continuum -- yep, there's a tweet for that:

Is there a twitter account that has a compilation of all these time traveling tweets? I thought I saw one mentioned a while ago ITT but not sure.

It's like they're determined to make things as ****ty as they possibly can but also want to make sure their ****ty plans take a while to kick in so they don't get blamed.
https://twitter.com/trumphop

That one's fun but it just shows what he's said on the current day in previous years.

It's too bad I'm too lazy to do a gimmick account of time traveling Trump that's just re-tweets him with no additional commentary.

Still pretty sure it's the opposite in Trump's case. He's more likely thinking about the immediate consequences of signing vs not signing than he is to be thinking about a legal defense down the road. Your way is 1 level too high, and my last post was just to show how little consideration he gives to having a good legal defense.

Some Trump tweets are simply eternally relevant:

That one will be for the slow news days.

This bill is garbage and clearly unconstitutional.

Where's my pen?

Asking for a "friend"

The post got ponied about 4 months ago. But NBD, it'll probably pony someone else 4 months from now.

He did a fine dissection, but you only need extend enough rope to get the kill. The host has to control his show; he has to reclaim his time like Maxine Waters. That doing so may seem untoward (it isn't) to Trumpkins should not factor into the decision process in these segments, and

you are making the Fundamental Error here. You think they're talking about how fair Cuomo seemed this morning over at the /the_donald? Nope, it's still just dozens of threads about Hillary ordering the Seth Rich murder. Maybe we'll find some buried comments about Cuomo's honorable approach:

There are too many of these to post, but that first one really tells the story. Being nice is a pathognomonic sign of liberal cuckism to deplorables. They do not value it like you or I when somebody on their team is getting razed. Conversely, commendables want deflectors handled swiftly and forcefully.

Maybe that leaves a group of persuadable fence sitters in the middle. If that's the case, I can't imagine letting a loon spew stream-of-consciousness logorrhea for several minutes yields better outcomes than strictly controlling the convo. I mean, this is the thing that the conservative leadership knows and is actually good at: simple, on-point messaging with a high signal:noise ratio.

This was great when it got used with the self-pardon question last week.

You're still viewing this like its primary importance is to make you feel good about an owning.

Nope. This is about changing minds. Not the minds in your post, or my "Fundamental Error" of thinking all Trumpists are on the_donald, but the 20% of the public whose minds can be changed.

Wow, that last sentence. You'd might think this is satire, but it's real.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press...ering-americas

das;kpafsdholfadsghfads

¨HAHAHAHHAha i cant even..

Hmm...

Omission, omission, relax. Jared showed us those are ok.

Anyone wanna bet against the condition that Putin won't let him say a single bad word about him or Russia as part of the blackmail?

OMFG that last sentence.

Don't worry, he covered Russia in the previous paragraph:
We can cooperate with them, you guys!

a real donald dump

Jesus who puts a sentence like that in an official statement?

The tackiness of this guy is just beyond belief.