Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

05-12-2017 , 02:46 PM
Can wait for our next democratic pres to sign a million executive orders and nuke everything these *******s are doing. My god Im so tired of this ****. I wish I could stop following this administration.
05-12-2017 , 02:47 PM
Yes I think legally the process for charging the president with a crime is the same as anyone else but the reality of it is that it would be more of a political decision, rather than a legal decision.
05-12-2017 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
So the President can't be charged with a crime by the FBI or the DoJ, or even the local cops?
Nope, the fate of the free world rests solely in the hands of republican lawmakers. Sleep well.
05-12-2017 , 03:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
Ossoff is behind in the polls. I'm fairly sure he will lose. There are probably just barely enough Democrats and Indies in the district for him to win, but he's gotta capture virtually all of them. Hard to do even for the best candidates, and Ossoff isn't all that inspiring.
He has a better shot next year, tbh.
05-12-2017 , 03:02 PM
More specifically, if a President was indicted by the DOJ, he would simply fire the USA and appoint one to drop the charges. Any State charges would probably be dismissed on Supremacy grounds/Secret Service laughing at the cops who tried to arrest him.
05-12-2017 , 03:02 PM
fk the lead Republican enabler





oh, and don't forget Melissa McCarthy hosts SNL tmr night. gonna b good!
05-12-2017 , 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Nope, the fate of the free world rests solely in the hands of republican lawmakers. Sleep well.
Wait, what's the whole point of the FBI targeting admin or campaign officials like Mike Flynn and flipping them against a bigger fish like Trump if GOP can just say "nope, FU"? Are we constantly wasting resources?
05-12-2017 , 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyrnaFTW
Oh wow, The donald going on a middle east/European trip ,, it was nice knowing him..

good spot for them to take him out,, and them meaning our own agencies..
Dear Terrorists,
I'm not suggesting we'd be even,
05-12-2017 , 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Wait, what's the whole point of the FBI targeting admin or campaign officials like Mike Flynn and flipping them against a bigger fish like Trump if GOP can just say "nope, FU"? Are we constantly wasting resources?
The idea is that eventually the GOP will "have" to take him out via impeachment. I do not think there is anything this ******* could do, short of starting an unprovoked nuclear war, that would actually lead to impeachment. Others disagree.
05-12-2017 , 03:17 PM
i wouldn't expect the terrorists to do us any favors. donald trump is the biggest boon to radical islamic terrorists they've ever gotten. donald trump practically founded ISIS. in fact he literally founded ISIS.
05-12-2017 , 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
trump: comey better hope there weren't any "tapes" running during our dinner conversation!

spicer: the tweet speaks for itself. the president was simply stating a fact.
Next week it will be, "Of course I didn't mean actual 'tapes' didn't you notice the quotation marks around 'tapes?'"
05-12-2017 , 03:22 PM
They might as well decide to cancel WH briefings since they aren't even answering questions anymore.

"The President's tweets speak for themselves."
"I'm not aware of that huge discussion we had all day."
"The President has been clear..."
"We're not gonna let you pick apart words."
"I already answered that in depth."
"The President has no further comment."
"I'll (never) get back to you on that."

It's become a complete clown show all around. We need Trump to GTFO."
05-12-2017 , 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Next week it will be, "Of course I didn't mean actual 'tapes' didn't you notice the quotation marks around 'tapes?'"
Yes obviously I would use digital recordings, what year do you think it is??
05-12-2017 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
So the President can't be charged with a crime by the FBI or the DoJ, or even the local cops?
Pretty sure he could technically be charged and tried in federal court, but it would never happen.

Supreme court has ruled that an active POTUS is immune in state and local courts for supremacy clause reasons.
05-12-2017 , 03:27 PM
Something else...

How can we ever complete an investigation when the President keeps tampering with evidence, intimidating witnesses, obstructing justice, disassembling committees, and demanding loyalty or be fired? Where's America?
05-12-2017 , 03:28 PM
i'm starting to imagine a scenario where trump records every private conversation so he can replay them alone with ivanka because he knows he has dementia and ivanka thinks they can hide that secret

in this situation, ivanka is knowingly covering up her dad's "light treason" in a modern improvised arrested development reboot
05-12-2017 , 03:33 PM
anyone have any idea wtf Trump is implying is on the tapes?

and why is tapes in quotation marks?
05-12-2017 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
How can we ever complete an investigation when the President keeps tampering with evidence, intimidating witnesses, obstructing justice, disassembling committees, and demanding loyalty or be fired? Where's America?
The potential for all this stuff was always there. The executive branch has WAY too much power.

We just been getting by because we've always elected presidents with at least some level of sanity.
05-12-2017 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
Yes obviously I would use [bold] steam powered [/bold] recordings, what year do you think it is??
Fyp
05-12-2017 , 03:36 PM
Reps Cummings and Conyers now demanding WH to RELEASE THE TAPES

Any other pol would be stuck in this spot but he'll wiggle right out because half the country doesn't give a ****
05-12-2017 , 03:37 PM
"Supremacy clause" makes me picture Santa in a Klan hood.
05-12-2017 , 03:38 PM
We can probably remove DOJ from the above questions since they seem to be compromised as hell now too.

Which leaves only the FBI. Clearly they need to start targeting GOPers like Nunes and rolling them up until they surrender to Trump. Unless somehow the president is blackmailing them too with his "tapes" that he apparently uses.
05-12-2017 , 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
anyone have any idea wtf Trump is implying is on the tapes?

and why is tapes in quotation marks?
1) The implication is that Trump may have recorded one or more conversations he had with Comey.

2) He's an idiot.
05-12-2017 , 03:39 PM
so Clapper just refuted Trump before his tweet

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...-investigation


Is this performance art or is Trump just a psychopath?
05-12-2017 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
1) The implication is that Trump may have recorded one or more conversations he had with Comey.
Yes, but why is that detrimental to Comey? What is he is implying is on the tapes?

      
m