From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago - Page 516 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

...

Page 516 of 1110

First

16 316 416 466 496 506 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 526 536 566 616 716 1016

Last

Page 516 of 1110

First

16 316 416 466 496 506 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 526 536 566 616 716 1016

Last

10-24-2013 , 05:18 PM

#12876

grizy

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,773

So... either you're responsible for your car or you're not?

10-24-2013 , 05:21 PM

#12877

rjoefish

Got Out the Vote

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,086

Well, my car is registered in my name.

10-24-2013 , 05:21 PM

#12878

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

lol at the car analogies

gun nuts ghana nut

10-24-2013 , 05:30 PM

#12879

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by grizy

So... either you're responsible for your car or you're not?

o boy

10-24-2013 , 05:59 PM

#12880

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,296

Gun control and Responsible Gun Owners (TM) have some common ground here but you'll never get it if you demand equal time. Reckless endangerment, reckless homicide etc are more appropriate and would encourage responsibility.

10-24-2013 , 06:44 PM

#12881

2OutsNoProb

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 15,991

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoredSocial

Can any of the pro gun people in this thread make a coherent argument against guns having similar licensing and tracking to cars? Would it bother you especially if gun stores were expected to account for where their inventory went?

EDIT: Without using a slippery slope argument please. That argument is 100% bull**** and I think we all know it. There are plenty of gun haters who would happily take all of your guns, but I'm pretty sure the federal courts+the constitution will stop that from happening for the forseeable future.

They can't make any such coherent argument. Their only response when it comes to this will be that licensing and tracking is the 1st step in a process that will result in the black helicopters showing up to take all their precious size enhancers.

10-25-2013 , 05:59 PM

#12882

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoredSocial

There are plenty of gun haters who would happily take all of your guns, but I'm pretty sure the federal courts+the constitution will stop that from happening for the forseeable future.

Yeah but that group is miniscule and nobody would could even take them seriously.

10-25-2013 , 06:14 PM

#12883

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by formula72

Yeah but that group is miniscule and nobody would could even take them seriously.

Define minuscule and seriously... Because they're plenty of those people itf and they're taken plenty seriously

10-25-2013 , 06:28 PM

#12884

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Define minuscule and seriously... Because they're plenty of those people itf and they're taken plenty seriously

By who? Name someone "in power" or who have the ability to actually change laws that want the removal of "all guns" from people? Im not talking about the "lols" in this thread. Even the far left, those who are atleast taken seriously, don't demand the removal of all guns.

10-25-2013 , 06:32 PM

#12885

Mexibastardhawk

adept

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 803

10-25-2013 , 06:34 PM

#12886

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mexibastardhawk

....again, taken seriously.

"the votes weren't here" Diane Feinstein.

10-25-2013 , 06:38 PM

#12887

Mexibastardhawk

adept

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 803

Senators serving for over two decades aren't taken seriously? She's certainly a person in power who wants to take all guns. They do exist. Most just aren't as forward as this old bat.

10-25-2013 , 06:56 PM

#12888

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mexibastardhawk

Senators serving for over two decades aren't taken seriously? She's certainly a person in power who wants to take all guns. They do exist. Most just aren't as forward as this old bat.

Senators can be elected and re-elected and still not be well-rounded on all issues. She clearly doesn't even have a 30,000 ft understanding on the subject of guns and when she makes those statements, it is announced as such.

If in say 50 years the country decided that was best to remove and ask for the return of all guns, than we prolly screwed up so many other things that it wouldn't of mattered at that point anyways. We are no were near that stage just yet because Diane Feinstein said so.

10-25-2013 , 07:35 PM

#12889

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by formula72

....again, taken seriously.

"the votes weren't here" Diane Feinstein.

Dude the freaking president endorsed a hand gun ban as a state senator candidate. And a ****ing senator counts. Nice no true scotsman game though.

10-25-2013 , 07:37 PM

#12890

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

We've gone from a group to no true person in power to no senator without power and soon to be no true president. This is fun.

10-25-2013 , 08:20 PM

#12891

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

Dude the freaking president endorsed a hand gun ban as a state senator candidate. And a ****ing senator counts. Nice no true scotsman game though.

Dude you and I will always have our guns....Who cares about what Obama did in Chicago.

10-25-2013 , 08:23 PM

#12892

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,296

I'm here for your guns.

10-25-2013 , 08:23 PM

#12893

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Lol and there it is. Confronted with this forum in response to no one wants to take your guns, back into no politician. Confronted with a long time US senator, back into no politician taken seriously. Confronted with the president, back into no person can be taken seriously.

Just too good

10-25-2013 , 08:24 PM

#12894

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl

I'm here for your guns.

**** at least you're honest about it and aren't a tube like formula

10-25-2013 , 08:25 PM

#12895

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikestoys

....and they still cant even get background checks in....Yes they are not taken seriously.

10-25-2013 , 08:30 PM

#12896

formula72

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 4,743

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mexibastardhawk

Lol this woman was gawd awful.

10-25-2013 , 08:45 PM

#12897

ikestoys

banned

Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 94,424

Dammit that autocorrected meant rube

10-25-2013 , 10:59 PM

#12898

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by formula72

Lol this woman was gawd awful.

Just slightly less awful than how much her views are grossly magnified to scare single-issue gun voters and push gun sales. An entire slippery-slope fallacy that even a little reform or further regulation will lead to GUNS BANNED is propagated virtually by her words alone.

Edit: Bloomberg too, forgot about that schmuck.

11-12-2013 , 12:24 PM

#12899

spanktehbadwookie

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 19,374

Is there anyway to confront a person or group of people while brandishing arms and not be intimidating? What is the point of this? Is it bullying? Is it good public relations?

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...rol-advocates/

Quote:

On Saturday, nearly 40 armed men, women, and children waited outside a Dallas, Texas area restaurant to protest a membership meeting for the state chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, a gun safety advocacy group formed in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

According to a spokeswoman for Moms Demand Action (MDA), the moms were inside the Blue Mesa Grill when members of Open Carry Texas (OCT) — an open carry advocacy group — “pull[ed] up in the parking lot and start[ed] getting guns out of their trunks.” The group then waited in the parking lot for the four MDA members to come out. The spokeswoman said that the restaurant manager did not want to call 911, for fear of “inciting a riot” and waited for the gun advocates to leave. The group moved to a nearby Hooters after approximately two hours.

And apparently a photo of the group from a side angle is dishonest:

http://www.nationalmemo.com/far-righ...demand-action/

11-12-2013 , 02:19 PM

#12900

[Phill]

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 52,717

Good to know if I want to get away with terrorising people in America with armed military style weaponry all I need to do is carry the correct flag and smile.

Page 516 of 1110

First

16 316 416 466 496 506 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 526 536 566 616 716 1016

Last

...

Page 516 of 1110

First

16 316 416 466 496 506 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 526 536 566 616 716 1016

Last