Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosher
See my open letter for stats, research, and seven suggestions to address the real problem. Read it earnestly and provide your feedback. The 33% of 153 mass killings from 2006-2010 that did not include guns was in USA today yesterday from the FBI. I can't scan the paper it is too big they might have a web page to find it on.
Okay, I'll look it up. Even if you're correct it still stands that 67% of mass killins were from fire arms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosher
Not at all. I don't think you should prevent me from being able to safely and responsibly be prepared to defend myself, but I don't think you should be able to yell fire in crowded theaters or barrage impressionable children by engrossing them in simulations where the act out horrific criminal acts of gun violence and are desensitized by the virtual murder of tens of thousands of simulated opponents. All your other speech that does not pose an overwhelming threat to public safety while serving no legitimate purpose will still be protected. Nobody has told me what purpose these criminal simulators our young children serve other that to make disingenuous claims that I advocate repealing the first amendment on all accounts. I also don't think F bombs should be dropped on daytime tv society agrees why aren't you protesting that 1st amendment violation. Why do you hold so dear your death simulators and virtual criminal gun violence trainers? What purpose do they serve? Is it not for the greater public good they be outlawed? Can you address the issue earnestly without attempting to disingenuously reframe it as if I am advocating the complete removal of the 1st amendment? It's time for tough decisions and tough choices. Are the grabbers telling me giving up your depictions of glorified criminal acts is too tough of a choice and that it is off the table?
First, paragraphs please.
It is not disingenuous to say that banning certain types of video games would be a fundamental shift in the history of our first amendment. On the other hand it has only been in the last 30-40 years that the supreme court has interpreted the 2nd amendment as a means to allow what it allows today.
The reason I would not yet consider censoring all forms of media in favor of gun control is because we have seen gun control work in other countries. Other countries that have the same violence obsessed cultures. I'd prefer to have a gun control system like Japan.