Not specifically but trying to be a reasonable, not hateful person isn't something I fear becoming.

I know I make mistakes but I'm not tying to.

This is why you are the WOAT, Chez.

There just isn't multiple ways to interpret what went on in the great wilching of 2015.

On top of the DEADLINE, Wil straight up accused LG of cheating because he offered to not count bonuses.

But sure, let's note the fact that Wil paid up promptly. WHICH IS WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO.

wil666 said he works a particular kind of rotating shift work, and was upfront (like myself) about being a bar drinker. His on-again, off-again pattern is fully understandable.

FoldnDark does have a habit of posting like a tweeker. But, I had the misfortune of living vicariously through the first wave of tweek (which was highly localized to urban SoCal). As tweekish as FoldnDark rants seem to get hours in, real tweekers doing real tweek that long mentally degenerate in ways FoldnDark does not. Occam's Razor sez insomnia.

I have no WAG for chezlaw.

That's right, what he is supposed to do is pay up promptly. And that's exactly what he did.

It gets better every time.

What you are doing in this thread is literally saying nothing and just copying and pasting what other people are saying as some sort of a psychological technique. You just go into "gotta defend my bro" mode but have zero arguments. This is apparent to everyone reading.

Exactly. Wil did end up paying on time. This is not especially honorable or notable. It's supposed to be normal and unremarkable. The reason why people are trashing wil is because all of the completely not normal **** that happened before that that chez seems to want to ignore.

My sleeping habits for those who are fascinated by these things have been discussed somewhere.

What's WAG?

Wild Ass Guess.

It's commonly called honouring a bet. I haven't ignored the rest and I agreed with your points - remember.

But Wil is not being portrayed as the sort of person who acts normally and pays his bets on time. The fact he did acted normally when it came to honouring this bet is therefore worth remarking on.

Holy **** chez he hates you, you know that right?

Yes. After multiple desperate attempts to get out of it while smearing his opponents name for no reason, outing himself as a crazy highly impulsive person and caving only when the thread pressured him and kept calling him out on his ridiculousness.

I will even go a step further. I find it to be a mistake by you personally, as a moderator, to allow wil to engage in bets with other people in your moderated forum after this fiasco.

Yeah, the fact that this odious fool actually acted normally at all, ever, even once, is quite remarkable. Thanks for beating that dead horse.

But, that still isn't half as remarkable as this so-called "bet" he made with LetsGambool.

He was told he was going to lose. He insisted on "betting" anyways. He happened to pick a dude who cashed more on a bonus (and IRRC also made more per pay period), than wil666 makes in several years.

How does it get better each time? How?

But that's the chezfuel. Similar to BruceZ being deplorable and not liking him. Defining feature not bug of chezziness.

p.s. Like, he hasn't defended FoldN nearly as much, not even close, because FoldN likes him. That doesn't get the chezmotor humming.

I suspect this post is another patented SMP posting technique. Like you're drawing an equivalency between this actual show of good will with the fact that Wil just paid up. You don't need to post this since the fact that LG handled himself as well as possible is obvious to everyone.

I'm onto you, buddy.

see, THIS is a phenomenal example of saying **** that just simply did not happen. the thread exists, we can all read it. it has been linked. and yet, for whatever reason, you characterize wilch's actions as those which they are not.

wilch lost the bet - realized he was going to lose - and then got embarrassingly hammered before imposing a time limit he came up with all by himself, with a countdown to boot!

so yeah, he is not the sort of person that "acts normally and pays his bets on time." stop lying.

If you truly believe otherwise, you need to have a hard look in the mirror and ask yourself if you are a good judge when it comes to what qualifies as acting normally.

OK this is a little gem I actually missed before whilst reading the LG Incident post-election:


Nailed it.

You'd think part of "letting go" would be not obsessing over defending fools who aren't even relevant anymore.

It's like rollin bbs past Teh Jabber-Wookie. Mention Odi Award winner Bruce Z, get a comment back. How many years ago was that shiz? Now we got chezlaw defending the reputation of wil666, because he can't be here anymore.

Baja is closed. Bruce Z doesn't post here anymore. wil666 is blissfully exiled. These are all good things. You'd think part of "letting go" would be not obsessing over defending fools who aren't even relevant anymore. You'd think.

And, because I'm a crazy person, I am giving play-by-play color commentary ITT.

Yeah, SpankTBW was definitely infected by the chezrus for a little while there, in the months following The Fiasco, and although he made a very good recovery there are some subtle latent symptoms that flare up periodically.

Speaking of the "Fall of Saigon" days at the end of Baja... modding wise, things collapsed. IMO the foulest of bile was ironically spewed by a mod: augie_. Let the record show.

I think it means not constantly dragging up old stuff. When it gets dragged up then it becomes's partially current again. I'm including some facts that apparently aren't welcome because they are perceived as defending him

Something to think about maybe? when you see such big objections to some, afiak, undisputed facts on a topic others have dragged up - because they are perceived as a defense

BOIDS lol glad you're back, mang... wat happened to BAIDS?

After three years of this shizz, chez is still allowed to tard up the forum. Just amazing.