When I was doing my morning knowledge graze of the internet, I came across this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXVZe...-inE7STncX6AiU
I may be a little behind the power curve on this one. I saw in the other thread that some of the financial facts about this organization spending 69% of it's donations on itself was already out in the open. However, the full scope of this as a likely shill campaign for another agenda with so many layers doesn't even begin to come into focus by looking at the spending in a vacuum.
I muse about how it would be that all the kool-aid drinking viral campaign do-gooders out there could reconcile this in their conscience. This is a campaign that has a goal of the use of military force. What's more, it's in a country we didn't give a crap about until we figured out it had oil a couple of years ago. Weren't people supposed to be all against that kind of **** when GWB was president and talking about doing it in Iraq? Saddam Hussein had WMD's but Kony has child soldiers???? OMFG we must invade!
The cherry on top was the letter that Obama sent them about sending "military advisers" in. Vietnam, anyone? Anyone?
I think people are getting duped. Again.
Please, someone tell me, in light of the information in this video, how could the body politic that the viral campaign is aimed at possibly get behind it. It seems to me that they would be acting purely contrary to their principles which they have used to oppose so many other things in their lives.