Quote:
Originally Posted by Josem
I agree substantially with this - but it also comes with the cost of reduced medical research, reduced remuneration for staff, and operators not being held accountable for bad management decisions (amongst others).
I have no idea why so many people are treating you like a good faith interlocutor, but no you don't agree. And don't ****ing try to talk back with big words. Public policy opinion is above your ****ing station in life, Josem.
Your daddy might make a good living at the crisps factory or whatever the **** he does, but you ain't ****ing clever enough to pull this **** off.
Quote:
It also has a bunch of regulatory challenges which exacerbate the problem, such as (substantially) tying insurance to work, limiting insurance options, amongst others.
Young Republicans have at least embraced the passion of being ****ing Nazis, there's some drama here. Young Tories trying to act like they are being reasonable then, when confronted with the failures of the market in the US health care system, trying to pivot back to blaming the government?
The dispute here is simple. You believe that dead poor people are preferable to high taxes. I disagree. This is a moral disagreement.
Everything else, all the wonkery, all the numbers, that's all for show, but just to make very very clear that's also only for me. None of the tweed jacketed public school buggery enthusiasts you learn your talking points from are intellectuals, son, subject matter expertise is only for us. Never for you.