Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Jeff Bezos Is Now Worth Over 0 Billion Jeff Bezos Is Now Worth Over 0 Billion

10-05-2018 , 05:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Online shopping existed long before Amazon did, but that's not the point.

Entire industries exist to service massive companies like Amazon. Their economies of scale allow me to press a button and have a $6 spatula delivered to my house in 3 hours for free if I wanted so. If you decided that "nobody is allowed to be worth more than $100,000,000" like some other guy ITT says, our entire way of life changes, and not for the better.

IBM, Apple, Microsoft, Google. What does a world look like when IBM is forced to stop growth and expansion back in 1962 because they were "too rich" by then and we decided that money was better spent on relatively minor increases in worker pay?
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to

Jeff Bezos did not invent network effects he just happened to benefit from them to the tune of 10,000 fortunes. We just want 9999 of those fortunes. We'll even let him keep 1.
10-05-2018 , 05:10 PM
Venezuela!


And that's a bingo!!
10-05-2018 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Venezuela!


And that's a bingo!!
Man, I had four and needed "Sweden can only do it because of homogeneity."
10-05-2018 , 05:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
If you hate America and capitalism, there are plenty of pseudo-socialist countries you can apply for residency in.
Some questions I find interesting (Patrick Collison, CEO and co-founder of Stripe)

Quote:
Why are there so many successful startups in Stockholm?

London and Paris have surprisingly few successful tech startups for their size. Stockholm, a city of less than 1 million people, has Spotify, King, Klarna, iZettle, and Mojang, all valued at more than $1 billion. What's true of Stockholm that isn't true of other European cities?
10-05-2018 , 05:18 PM
Not to mention more traditional global powerhouse companies like Ikea, Volvo, H&M, Ericsson coming from a country with less people than North Carolina. But hurr durr USA#1, no other countries allow business to succeed, blah blah talking point meowchow
10-05-2018 , 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
We just want 9999 of those fortunes. We'll even let him keep 1.
He wouldn't have 9999 fortunes to give if you had your way, DUCY?

Socialism doesn't work. Just stop.
10-05-2018 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Not to mention more traditional global powerhouse companies like Ikea, Volvo, H&M, Ericsson coming from a country with less people than North Carolina. But hurr durr USA#1, no other countries allow business to succeed, blah blah talking point meowchow
The IKEA guy is worth $60 billion. Where are the calls for him to donate his fortune to all the CNC machines that run his company?

What say the Swedes about such disgusting wealth?
10-05-2018 , 05:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
He can transfer some shares to his employees?
Sure, or give them to you.
10-05-2018 , 05:25 PM
Dumb conservatives when you point out social benefits of the Nordic model: "Sweden style socialism can't work in the USA"
Dumb conservatives when you point out successful Nordic businesses: "Sweden isn't socialist at all actually"
10-05-2018 , 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to
Their economies of scale allow me to

Jeff Bezos did not invent network effects he just happened to benefit from them to the tune of 10,000 fortunes. We just want 9999 of those fortunes. We'll even let him keep 1.
What you don't understand is the internet was a stupid piece of **** before Inso0 could get spatulas teleported to his house or whatever.
10-05-2018 , 05:26 PM
Uh oh, I just read that IKEA starting wage is $9.25 in retail. Average is under $11.

90% 89.9% of IKEA employees are in their retail division.

HONEY, WHERE IS MY PITCHFORK!?

Last edited by Inso0; 10-05-2018 at 05:28 PM. Reason: Didn't want to get called out for exaggerating
10-05-2018 , 05:27 PM
DARPANet? More like DERPanet amirite?
10-05-2018 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Uh oh, I just read that IKEA starting wage is $9.25 in retail. Average is under $11.

90% 89.9% of IKEA employees are in their retail division.

HONEY, WHERE IS MY PITCHFORK!?

Don't worry they're all gonna quit and start their own Ikeas. Problem solved.
10-05-2018 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Uh oh, I just read that IKEA starting wage is $9.25 in retail. Average is under $11.

90% 89.9% of IKEA employees are in their retail division.

HONEY, WHERE IS MY PITCHFORK!?
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Dumb conservatives when you point out social benefits of the Nordic model: "Sweden style socialism can't work in the USA"
Dumb conservatives when you point out successful Nordic businesses: "Sweden isn't socialist at all actually"
.
10-05-2018 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
Don't worry they're all gonna quit and start their own Ikeas. Problem solved.
Well, they don't have to go that far. They could learn a useful skill and fill one of the many vacant jobs that pay significantly more than $11.

That said, cabinetmaking and carpentry is definitely one of those jobs they could learn and make a ton of money at, so starting their own isn't completely out of the question.
10-05-2018 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Man, I had four and needed "Sweden can only do it because of homogeneity."
threw you a curveball at the last second
10-05-2018 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
Socialism or corporate overlords. No in between. Decide now!!!
Give me oligarchy or give me death!
10-05-2018 , 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
If you dismantle IBM in the 60s because they were "too rich" like the other guy alluded to, Bezos may well have been a plumber. He pursued an education in computer science, and you can thank the fat cats at IBM and Xerox for that.
In the 60's IBM paid their employees a living wage in line with the profits they were making. If we had dismantled IBM in the 60's we would have had more competition in the PC market and possibly a less homogenous computing environment today.
10-05-2018 , 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Uh oh, I just read that IKEA starting wage is $9.25 in retail. Average is under $11.

90% 89.9% of IKEA employees are in their retail division.

HONEY, WHERE IS MY PITCHFORK!?
How much do you want to be this is in their home country and doesn't take into account either the currency conversion factor or that health care isn't part of the salary because of socialized medicine?
10-05-2018 , 06:48 PM
Better to have someone like Elon Musk or Jeff Bazos have 100 billion+- of capital to invest in a successful project, than the government who's gonna light it on fire. Not to mention those individuals actually earned it.

Last edited by 27AllIn; 10-05-2018 at 06:54 PM.
10-05-2018 , 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
The IKEA guy is worth $60 billion. Where are the calls for him to donate his fortune to all the CNC machines that run his company?
Kamprad died in his sleep of pneumonia at his home in Småland, Sweden, on 27 January 2018 at the age of 91. According to his will, half of Kamprad's inheritance will go to projects in Norrland, a sparsely populated part of Sweden. Kamprad reportedly wanted to develop Norrland and make it possible for young people to live there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27AllIn
Better to have someone like Elon Musk or Jeff Bazos have 100 billion+- of capital to invest in a successful project, than the government who's gonna light it on fire. Not to mention those individuals actually earned it.
Who the **** is arguing for the money to go to the government?
10-05-2018 , 06:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27AllIn
Better to have someone like Elon Musk or Jeff Bazos have 100 billion+- of capital to invest in a successful project, than the government who's gonna light it on fire. Not to mention those individuals actually earned it.
Bezos and Musk did not earn their net worths. Large portions of their wealth flow from ownership which does not require any work at all.
10-05-2018 , 07:07 PM
There's a switch that occurs when talking about the poor and the rich. When talking about the poor the refrain we often here is that virtually all Americans aren't absolutely poor but might be comparelty poor and as such we shouldn't worry about them too much. But for the rich they have to make X amount of dollars or they absolutely will not innovate regardless of how high that income is.

It seems like we could say that that the entrepreneurship happens when someone wants to be wealthy relative to others and as such Bezos would innovate even if he were only mildly richer than everyone else, not astronomically. In that case we could squish the incomes of the rich and poor and have nearly the same amount of innovation.
10-05-2018 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Who the **** is arguing for the money to go to the government?
Basically all Liberals? There's a huge tax the rich more campaign.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Bezos and Musk did not earn their net worths. Large portions of their wealth flow from ownership which does not require any work at all.
Hue if someone owns a cow, is that person not entitled to the milk?
10-05-2018 , 07:21 PM
Look at the guy who thinks he has exclusive and total rights to another living thing just because he says so.

      
m