Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
January New Years LC Thread January New Years LC Thread

01-06-2016 , 03:44 PM
NRA declines to participate in Obama gun town hall

Clearly confident in the power of their ideas.
01-06-2016 , 04:44 PM
The Intercept has an article with an interesting theory about the current Saudi Arabia-Iran feud: it's about oil

Quote:
But to the degree that the current crisis has anything to do with religion, it’s much less about whether Abu Bakr or Ali were Muhammad’s rightful successor and much more about who’s going to control something more concrete right now: oil.

In fact, much of the conflict can be explained by a fascinating map created by M.R. Izady, a cartographer and adjunct master professor at the U.S. Air Force Special Operations School/Joint Special Operations University in Florida.

What the map shows is that, due to a peculiar correlation of religious history and anaerobic decomposition of plankton, almost all the Persian Gulf’s fossil fuels are located underneath Shiites. This is true even in Sunni Saudi Arabia, where the major oil fields are in the Eastern Province, which has a majority Shiite population.

As a result, one of the Saudi royal family’s deepest fears is that one day Saudi Shiites will secede, with their oil, and ally with Shiite Iran.

This fear has only grown since the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq overturned Saddam Hussein’s minority Sunni regime, and empowered the pro-Iranian Shiite majority. Nimr himself said in 2009 that Saudi Shiites would call for secession if the Saudi government didn’t improve its treatment of them.



As Izady’s map so strikingly demonstrates, essentially all of the Saudi oil wealth is located in a small sliver of its territory whose occupants are predominantly Shiite. (Nimr, for instance, lived in Awamiyya, in the heart of the Saudi oil region just northwest of Bahrain.) If this section of eastern Saudi Arabia were to break away, the Saudi royals would just be some broke 80-year-olds with nothing left but a lot of beard dye and Viagra prescriptions.

Nimr’s execution can be partly explained by the Saudis’ desperation to stamp out any sign of independent thinking among the country’s Shiites.
Article has a link to a bigger map with a legend, short version is dark green = shiite, light green = sunni, black and red = oil and gas deposits respectively.
01-06-2016 , 04:54 PM
That is one hot take.
01-06-2016 , 04:55 PM
Also, Greenwald writing about UK politics is a treasure:

Quote:
In response to the dismissal of a couple of anti-Corbyn ministers yesterday, several others Labour MPs have announced their protest-resignations with the gestures of melodrama and martyrdom at which banal British politicians excel.

Rather than wallow in all that internal power jockeying of a former world power,
lol, shots fired! Article is good too, focuses on British politicians calling the new Labour Party leader a terrorist sympathizer for suggesting that Western attacks on the Middle East have repercussions (and why he's obviously right).
01-06-2016 , 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
Say "Hello" to HaLow, the upcoming low power wifi spec for the internet of things maybe!
With the lights out its less dangerous. Here we are now entertain us. I feel stupid and contagious.
01-06-2016 , 08:35 PM
just invented a tongue twister while singing about my dogs to my dogs:

try saying "rat brigade" ten times fast
01-06-2016 , 09:44 PM
As the political forum of record I suppose we should note that Gary Johnson is running again.
01-06-2016 , 10:18 PM
Who?
01-06-2016 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Who?

The guy with a silent "t" in his name. I would blame autocorrect but it is probably how I typed it.
01-06-2016 , 11:47 PM
Some reporter interviewed him and his pitch was, "I ran last time and I'll tell you I sucked, but some people still wanted me to run so here I am".
01-07-2016 , 12:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
With the lights out its less dangerous. Here we are now entertain us. I feel stupid and contagious.
01-07-2016 , 09:19 AM
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/loc...e53438435.html

School choice is totes the issue to pull minority voters to the GOP, the teachers unions are the real racists
01-07-2016 , 09:35 AM
Oh for sure better to trap everyone in **** schools instead of letting the people who care about their children's future go elsewherr
01-07-2016 , 09:51 AM
2016 and ikes is still the nut low poster on these here forums.

Worst outcome possible is Cruz the nominee and ikes still posting.
01-07-2016 , 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh for sure better to trap everyone in **** schools instead of letting the people who care about their children's future go elsewherr
You mean the schools in very affluent suburbs? Agreed.
01-07-2016 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Also, Greenwald writing about UK politics is a treasure:



lol, shots fired! Article is good too, focuses on British politicians calling the new Labour Party leader a terrorist sympathizer for suggesting that Western attacks on the Middle East have repercussions (and why he's obviously right).
He is a terrorist sympathiser for his history sympathising with terrorists like hamas and the ira when he was a back bencher. Its nothing to do with the notion of actions=consequences.
01-07-2016 , 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrollyWantACracker
You mean the schools in very affluent suburbs? Agreed.
That and wealthy people who got stuck in poor neighborhoods because of job location, etc.
01-07-2016 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
That and wealthy people who got stuck in poor neighborhoods because of job location, etc.
I'm confused, you're against kids going to better schools because of.....
01-07-2016 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
I'm confused, you're against kids going to better schools because of.....
We're against this particular solution to getting kids in better schools because it leaves poor, minority kids out of the whole "going to better schools" thing.
01-07-2016 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
The Intercept has an article with an interesting theory about the current Saudi Arabia-Iran feud: it's about oil



Article has a link to a bigger map with a legend, short version is dark green = shiite, light green = sunni, black and red = oil and gas deposits respectively.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
That is one hot take.
This is old news and was a huge deal in the First Gulf War when the US/etc. stationed all of the troops in that Shiite area in Saudi Arabia before the invasion.

IIRC Saddam's goal after invading Kuwait was to just set those oil fields on fire and cause an insurrection by the Shiites there. Not 100% sure I'm remembering that correctly though.
01-07-2016 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
We're against this particular solution to getting kids in better schools because it leaves poor, minority kids out of the whole "going to better schools" thing.
It doesn't actually do that, it gives poor minority students a second option to get away from the ****hole you're confining them to
01-07-2016 , 12:13 PM
It's important that kids have an option where they will be able to learn about the role of jesus in america's founding. If I'm not mistaken the results of charter schools have not been shown to be superior to regular old schools. Like their slogans though, "Left some kids behind (for the public schools to deal with)."
01-07-2016 , 12:26 PM
There nothing complicated about the school issue imo. Take ikestoys, for example, he is amazingly intelligent and has everything figure out, so all we have to do is send all the poor kids to the school he went to. Problem solved.

I'm not sure which school that was exactly, but it was obviously a charter school without any teacher's union. Maybe he can fill us in.
01-07-2016 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
It doesn't actually do that, it gives poor minority students a second option to get away from the ****hole you're confining them to
Except that they don't seem to be doing that. Funny, huh?
01-07-2016 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
It doesn't actually do that, it gives poor minority students a second option to get away from the ****hole you're confining them to
You don't read the articles people post
Quote:
Charter schools have a smaller proportion of low-income students, the report says. At charters last year, 36 percent of students were economically disadvantaged, compared with nearly 55 percent at traditional schools.

More than 57 percent of students attending charter schools in the current school year are white, compared with traditional public schools’ 49.5 percent, the report said.
Per the article charter schools are currently proportionally more for white wealthier families in NC than they are for poor minority students.

      
m