Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
January low political content thread January low political content thread

01-06-2010 , 03:40 PM
thsi is not a no content thread imo
01-06-2010 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
Random observation: the level of content in the no content threads has been getting way too high over the last few months.
Happy now you big baby?
01-06-2010 , 03:44 PM
more of a "content not worthy of its own thread" thread
01-06-2010 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
Happy now you big baby?
Yes.
01-06-2010 , 04:00 PM
I agree with Erik, I wasn't even bothering to read anymore. Oh look more blah, blah, blah.
01-06-2010 , 04:08 PM
Probably mentioned somewhere else on this forum but Dorgan and Dodd are not going to run in 2010. There's a story out there that Ed Schultz is going to run in ND.
01-06-2010 , 04:47 PM
Ed Schultz, really? That sounds entertaining.
01-06-2010 , 05:06 PM
01-06-2010 , 05:11 PM
A graph to warm the heart of every leftist...

01-06-2010 , 05:20 PM
lol at Reagan. Nice try, but no cigar.
01-06-2010 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not_In_My_Name
lol at Reagan. Nice try, but no cigar.
Clinton, on the other hand...
01-06-2010 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian J
A graph to warm the heart of every leftist...

Meh. "Goods producing" excludes the service economy (granted, that includes some pretty worthless employment) and neither chart really means much unless adjusted for population (guessing that government employment as a percentage has gone up faster than the population btw). And the military seems to have been excluded. The government (federal, state and local???) for WW2 seems to be something like 6 or 7 million, so that can't include the 8 million who were in the armed services at that time.
01-06-2010 , 05:39 PM
lol service economy

We'll all mow each other's lawns and blow each other into prosperity.
01-06-2010 , 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borodog
lol service economy

We'll all mow each other's lawns and blow each other into prosperity.


imo
01-06-2010 , 05:51 PM
Sure, crap jobs flipping burgers and mowing lawns are part of the service economy but so are fields like software engineering and pharmacy.
01-06-2010 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
Sure, crap jobs flipping burgers and mowing lawns and pharmacy are part of the service economy but so are fields like software engineering.
FYP
01-06-2010 , 06:07 PM
Heh.
01-06-2010 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
Sure, crap jobs flipping burgers and mowing lawns are part of the service economy but so are fields like software engineering and pharmacy.
Software engineering is part of service economy? How do you figure? Maybe some portion but not all as I can assure of that.
01-06-2010 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynton
Ed Schultz, really? That sounds entertaining.
I thought so as well. A draft Ed Shultz movement apparently has started in ND.
01-06-2010 , 06:28 PM
01-06-2010 , 06:29 PM
01-06-2010 , 06:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Software engineering is part of service economy? How do you figure? Maybe some portion but not all as I can assure of that.
Not at all a scientific sample, but compare this to this for the results numbers. But, sure, it could be argued both ways.

And don't try to tell me that "service economy" fast food doesn't taste manufactured.
01-06-2010 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
Not at all a scientific sample, but compare this to this for the results numbers. But, sure, it could be argued both ways.

And don't try to tell me that "service economy" fast food doesn't taste manufactured.

Contributes to both but there's definitely a significant portion of software engineering effort put into producing goods.

I agree though that there is a lot more to the USA service economy than flipping burgers. In fact manufacturing goods as the engine of employment in the USA is long gone, has been, and that will continue to be the case. That's not necessarily a bad thing either FWIW.

Last edited by adios; 01-06-2010 at 07:02 PM.

      
m