Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
February low political content thread February low political content thread

02-08-2010 , 02:27 PM
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei

(abbreviated NSDAP)

N = national
S = socialist
D = German (Deutsche)
A = workers (Arbeiter)
P = Party

So if you are a nationalist, you may be a nazi

So if you are a socialist, you may be a nazi

So if you are a German, you may be a nazi

So if you are pro-worker, you may be a nazi

So if you belong to a Party, you may be a nazi
02-08-2010 , 02:39 PM
your slow pony is polluting up this thread
02-08-2010 , 02:47 PM
I'm not sure what's funnier - the advert or all the "THAT'S WHERE THIS IS GOING, THIS IS WHAT THE LEFT WANTS" type posts.
02-08-2010 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not_In_My_Name
I'm not sure what's funnier - the advert or all the "THAT'S WHERE THIS IS GOING, THIS IS WHAT THE LEFT WANTS" type posts.
The first is funny, the second is sadly funny.
02-08-2010 , 02:58 PM
One thing I noticed in the green police commercial was arresting (or whatever) the guy who chose plastic over paper at the supermarket checkout.

If you are worried about that sort of thing any sort of re-usable bag is clearly the best option but after that I'm pretty sure plastic is a better (maybe far better) choice than paper. Paper bags take way more energy to produce, way more energy to recycle and finally also take a ton of extra energy to transport due to the fact that they weigh so much more.

Anyway, I thought that was kind of funny.
02-08-2010 , 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SL__72
One thing I noticed in the green police commercial was arresting (or whatever) the guy who chose plastic over paper at the supermarket checkout.

If you are worried about that sort of thing any sort of re-usable bag is clearly the best option but after that I'm pretty sure plastic is a better (maybe far better) choice than paper. Paper bags take way more energy to produce, way more energy to recycle and finally also take a ton of extra energy to transport due to the fact that they weigh so much more.

Anyway, I thought that was kind of funny.
I don't really know a lot about green stuff (and tend not to really give a crap tbh), but isn't paper better because it is usually recyclable, and isn't the big point that plastic is far more difficult to dispose of and not as biodegradable as paper?
02-08-2010 , 03:11 PM
I don't either. My post is based on information from a friend who does care a lot about that sort of thing and also works for Target (which is where the transport info came from). Yes, the biodegradable thing is why people assume paper is better. I'm saying they are wrong because you can generally recycle either and any benefits paper provides due to biodegradability are outweighed by the extra energy it takes to make, transport and recycle it.

Last edited by SL__72; 02-08-2010 at 03:12 PM. Reason: I could be wrong of course, I've done 0 research on this.
02-08-2010 , 03:45 PM
02-08-2010 , 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerbobo
Drinkin w/ zombie Kennedy IMO
02-08-2010 , 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerbobo
I'm no journalism major, but shouldn't the headline read 'Dead at age 77'?
02-08-2010 , 05:26 PM
Unindicted coconspirator in ABSCAM imo
02-08-2010 , 05:58 PM
nate Silver on MSNBC right now

eta yeah that was quick.
02-08-2010 , 06:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerbobo
R.I.H. Jack Murtha
Rest in Heaven indeed
02-08-2010 , 06:37 PM
Palin suggest Obama could declare war with Iran to win in 2012.

Quote:
WALLACE: How hard do you think President Obama would be to defeat in 2012?

PALIN: It depends on a few things, say he played — I got this from Buchanan — say he played the war card. Say he decided to declare war on Iran or decide to really come out and do whatever he could to support Israel–which I would like him to do. That changes the dynamics of what we can assume will happen between now and three years. Because I think if the election were today, Obama would not be elected.

WALLACE: You’re not suggesting that Obama would cynically play the war card?

PALIN: I’m not suggesting that, I’m saying if he did, things would dramatically change if he decided to toughen up and do all that he can to secure our nation and secure our allies. I think people would shift their thinking a bit.
02-08-2010 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
I got this from Buchanan
Too lazy to come up with her own bad ideas.
02-08-2010 , 06:48 PM
Time to bring back an oldie.

[IMG]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/2764/debate******ed.jpg[/IMG]
02-08-2010 , 06:59 PM
Sarah needs to stop reading those Karl Rove ideas from the 2004 election playbook.
02-08-2010 , 07:06 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

"The Iranian nation, with its unity and God's grace, will punch the arrogance (Western powers) on the 22nd of Bahman (February 11) in a way that will leave them stunned,"
02-08-2010 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by istewart
Time to bring back an oldie.

[IMG]http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/2764/debate******ed.jpg[/IMG]
lolllll man thats good.
02-08-2010 , 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
lolllll man thats good.
Made me cringe.
02-08-2010 , 08:10 PM
LOL Rand Paul. (ok maybe LOL the stuff people say due to political necessity, but still)

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.c...the-other.html

Quote:
The line between the Ron Paul movement, the Tea Party and the Sarah Palin phenomenon continue to blur. Yesterday, the former Alaska governor endorsed Rand Paul in the Kentucky Senate race. Dr. Paul, an eye surgeon, is the son of Texas congressman Ron Paul, an ob/gyn who ran for president as a Libertarian and again in 2008 as a Republican.

"It's time to shake up the status quo in Washington and stand up for commonsense ideas," Palin said in a statement.

The younger Paul is a clear Tea Party favorite in the contest. The pit bull with lipstick is also a Tea Party favorite.


"Governor Palin is providing tremendous leadership as the Tea Party movement and constitutional conservatives strive to take our country back," Rand Paul said. "Sarah Palin is a giant in American politics. I am proud to receive her support."
A GIANT!!!!!
02-08-2010 , 08:20 PM
Clearly the best play by Rand is to piss off all the people who like Palin right? That's why Dems always tell Al Sharpton to **** off.
02-08-2010 , 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The 13th 4postle
George Mason University has a pretty free market Economics Department as does mine Florida State University. The only leftist teachers I had were political science Professors.
GMU is Austrian(though I'd note that the Rothbardians don't get along with GMU because GMU sometimes tries to do actual economics), but I strongly suspect FSU(like the vast majority of accredited universities) is mainstream economics. You just think it's "a free market" Economics department because of your exposure to this forum.

Because so few of the ACists/Austrians have actually taken a class in economics they really and honestly buy into the demonization of Marxists and Keynesians running the statist student indoctrination system(through the Federal Reserve, natch). For all they know that's what goes on. You see that, you take a regular normal econ class at a pretty standard and representative state university, and you're like "WOW MY PROFESSOR DIDN'T ADVOCATE GULAGS FOR THE KULAKS HE MUST BE BESTEST BUDDIES WITH LEW ROCKWELL".

Actual mainstream economics is incredibly pro-free market. It is willing to explore the concept of a market not producing perfect outcomes as a consequence of not being blinded by some absurd(yet easy to understand and digest) niche philosophy, but insofar as mainstream economics makes normative statements they tend to be libertarian(yet, note, they still voted for Obama. LOL educated people).

I, for example, would be way on the "classical liberal" side of any reasonable free market sympathy test. In before various ******s "LOL OMG" at that, but it's true. This ties in pretty nicely to the conversation where everyone who isn't Murray Rothbard is a socialist. The lack of perspective is nearly overwhelming.

      
m