A little bit, sure.

So why do you include the word 'overtly'?

That's "white supremacist" in the same way that BET is black supremacist.

Because therein lies the smear, of course.

Thanks. You know what is just as despicable as being racist? Smearing non-racists as racists, oh wait, I meant "not overtly racist."

Now I'm done.

But I didn't say you were a racist, and I didn't say you were a white supremacist, and that's not what you asked. I said if you give money to guys who write a bunch of racist stuff like Rockwell you're a little more likely to be a racist too, and if you work for a white supremacist's think tank, you're even more likely to be a white supremacist than a guy who just gives money, reads their books, or browses their web sites.

wat? Link to the BET website where it says black people have dominate culture and civilisation.

A television station devoted to black audience ...is not at all the same as that quote. What a bizarre analogy.

Im sure you will find bordeline homophobic comments by the roman catholich chuchr, yet not all roman catholics are homophobics.
Being part of a group doesnt mean u agree with everything they say.

Not necessarily, actually. If I think the world is round and just about everyone else I ever meet believes it is flat, I'll be way more likely to want to talk with anyone who also sees it as round.

It might be that you found out it was round because you're a child molester and you ride a raft to exotic islands to molest children, so you figured it out. That's unfortunate. But if I was determined to help people understand that the world is round, you might end up having information that helps me. And in this case it sharply reduces the likelihood that I would necessarily have other things in common with you (because the incentive to talk to you is already so high).

Whatever I eat for lunch today will indicate an increased likelihood of really enjoying that food. But if I'm starving on an island, it indicates little or nothing beyond that this is the food I was able to find. If I never talk about enjoying gizzard guts, it probably isn't fair to suggest I'm likely to enjoy them. "If you eat something it indicates a likelihood that you enjoy it" might sound nice, but it overlooks the chance I was starving (it actually assumes the perspective where I'm necessarily not starving).

GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CONTENT !!!11

This is not content imo.

we are discussing if some insignificant academic figure in the grand schemes of things is racist or not, seems low content to me.

I wouldn't go so far as to call borodog "insignificant"

I take offense at that.

I am no longer in academia.

in the grand schemes of things dilorenzo is insignifican, sure in mises wonderland he is important but not in the real world. The only people that are taken seriously are Nozick, Hayek, Friedman and others Im probably missing, but nobody gives a **** about dilorenzo, I would even say nobody cares about Hoppe either.

Right. I think I've been careful to say that because DiLorenzo works for the League of the South, that doesn't mean DiLorenzo agrees with everything the League of the South says. As an associated scholar, some of what the League of the South "says" comes from DiLorenzo himself.

Im not saying he isnt racist, Im just saying there is not enough evidence to say he is racist and to call him racist with the info we have now is unfair. Innocent till proven guilty imo.

Dvaut has always maintained that people should only hang out with the most squeaky clean individuals. Except of course when it's to further your own career in Chicago Politics, then its ok.

ban obv

Boro taking his ball and going home ITT

I think I said that DiLorenzo was guilty by association and nothing more. In fact, I even referenced that this was analogous to Obama:

K so I'll just read this one then?

so in addition to calling him a racist you implied that he is a lying marxist warmonger ??? jeesus man smear much?

How does an economy work? Can't money just be made and given to people to spend?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9135957AAk8a1k

Wtf is this ****ty content doing in the LC thread? I need someone to blame, and someone to ban. And that someone is:

Taso.

Why the hell did you need to specify that the book not be written by a white supremacist? Ban so you can consider your sins.