Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
It's a massive tell. Like, colleges discipline students for everything using that level, or less. Stop showing up to class with an attendance policy and argue against your bad grade/suspension/expulsion on the grounds that it's POSSIBLE you were there and just didn't sign in. See how that goes.
.
Apples to oranges. In the situation you describe, there is all kinds of evidence that can be demonstrated to show that the student wasn't in class. Lack of a sign in, or asking the other students "did you see John Doe at class on date ABC/CDF/XYZ" etc…
In the 'drunk sex and rape' situation there is typically only 2 people that know what happened- the man and the woman.
Quote:
People get indicted for crimes using that. Every civil case uses that, and given that college code of conduct hearings aren't criminal cases, it seems pretty logical to use the civil case standard.
Even in civil court accusation itself does not prove anything. It never has. That's the reason that up until very recent times these types of accusations were never prosecuted.
Quote:
But guys, when you like, sarcastically string out the zeroes(like a few of our MRA rape apologists have) to make it seem CRAZY like it's unique, it just makes you seem like you're unaware of how the world works. Literally unaware of how the world works. Probably because you're learning about this **** from absolute human garbage and/or trolls
Hey, man…I like to think I know how the world works. We as poker players rely on our knowledge of human nature and the way people think in the real world. And in the real world, when you start passing out the koolaid flavored
drunk sex=rape and you couple it with a young lady that had too much to drink and feels buyers remorse, you have a disaster.
disclaimer- I'm not accusing anyone of anything, I'm speaking in generalities so please don't ban me.