Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Coronation of Hillary Clinton: sexyhilldog69@aol.comghazi The Coronation of Hillary Clinton: sexyhilldog69@aol.comghazi

03-15-2015 , 11:47 AM
His approval rating is 47% and over 50% with age 18-54 demographic. His disapproval rating is below 50%, however.

Also, expect Obama's approval rating to slowly shoot up as Americans realize that he did a 180 to the **** show economy GW left. Unemployment down to under 5.8% and for those with a degree it's much less. And Jobs being added by U.S. companies at best rate since early 1990s. By and large our economy has already accomplished what Obama said it would under his watch, and only looking better as he finishes off the remainder of his second term.

Democrats came in and fixed a ****ty economy/recession past 2 times now, cleaning up GW and Bush/Reagan mess with a smile and a flexed arm. Why would anybody ever vote for a republican again?

This is the victory lap and dance for democrats. GOP can EAD for breakfast, everything Dems said about Obama and economy was right
03-15-2015 , 12:05 PM
even in real life voting, ikes abstains from having a dog in the fight so that he will never be "wrong"
03-15-2015 , 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
even in real life voting, ikes abstains from having a dog in the fight so that he will never be "wrong"
Lmao so true apparently
03-15-2015 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
Of course it was an Obama person. There is no way in hell that Obama wants to see Hillary win the prez, he knows how vindictive she is and the possibilities of what she might do to him if she were elected.

When Hillary set up her own server as SOS, Obama just smiled and said, "go ahead Hilldawg, that sounds like a great idea." And she was dumb enough to do it.
such fanfic
03-15-2015 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak

We're not invading a country whose capital looks like this:
Well, nothing "enduring" anyway. I'm sure the probability that we'll see "assertive disarmament", "precision strikes" and "collateral damage" in Iran increases dramatically with HRC at the helm (v practically any other Dem).

Also:

03-15-2015 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
even in real life voting, ikes abstains from having a dog in the fight so that he will never be "wrong"
Once bitten, twice shy after "McCain wins the general and it won't be close."
03-15-2015 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
ikes can't comprehend the simplest of concepts...if Hillary is the best shot at winning in 2016, that's who I'm supporting. She's not the optimal candidate in my mind by far, but I'm taking what I can get. Nominating Hillary with a good chance at winning the general >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominating 'Perfect Summation of my Democratic Views Candidate X' who has a greater chance of getting crushed.

But, continue spinning it into "LOL so u guyz like war now???"
It's precisely because of people like you that you get the kind of candidates you get.
03-15-2015 , 01:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
even in real life voting, ikes abstains from having a dog in the fight so that he will never be "wrong"
Oh did I abstain in 2012? Derp derp.
03-15-2015 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex
It's precisely because of people like you that you get the kind of candidates you get.
nope. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
03-15-2015 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh did I abstain in 2012? Derp derp.
Voting for Gary Johnson proves schu's point exactly. You would never be wrong about the purely hypothetical Gary Johnson administration.
03-15-2015 , 01:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
nope. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Last time I checked, elections were still decided by vote count.
03-15-2015 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Voting for Gary Johnson proves schu's point exactly. You would never be wrong about the purely hypothetical Gary Johnson administration.
Right that's what proof is. Couldn't be that I voted for the same reasons wookie did.
03-15-2015 , 01:40 PM
No way!?

Last edited by schu_22; 03-15-2015 at 01:40 PM. Reason: @Apex
03-15-2015 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
When did this happen?
When he offered to put tort reform on the table during the great Obamacare freak out of 2009. When he offered to talk about entitlements during the great debt ceiling freak out.
03-15-2015 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Lefty on lefty crime. Can't entirely blame the decline of the US education system as I believe Dino is Canadian.
I am, but I could be a dual citizen if I really wanted to be. Pops' family is Americano yo.
03-15-2015 , 05:38 PM
Pretty surprised they drive on the right side of the road in Iran tbh.
03-15-2015 , 05:53 PM
Why? Most of the world does, minus UK and Australia
03-15-2015 , 05:54 PM
Probably also surprised they drive cars instead of camels
03-15-2015 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
Why? Most of the world does, minus UK and Australia
Ireland, Malta, and Cyprus too

Final jeopardy question a couple months ago
03-15-2015 , 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Well I could easily be wrong but it seems to me Democrats are always so heavily on the back foot that they always need the safest possible candidate. Hilary has the cash to overcome the right wing media, no one else really does.
I didn't realize this was needed for the general election. If it was at all effective it would have swayed the last election.
03-15-2015 , 10:17 PM
You didn't realize money was needed for a general election?
03-15-2015 , 10:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
When he offered to put tort reform on the table during the great Obamacare freak out of 2009. When he offered to talk about entitlements during the great debt ceiling freak out.
Wasn't Obamacare more or less an idea that, like, the Heritage Foundation or some other righwing policy group proposed in response to Hillarycare?
03-16-2015 , 08:11 AM
This isn't a new thought, but the problem with D's being "fine" with Hillary and thus her not being challenged in the primary is that it shifts the aggregate message further right. Similar to how the Tea Party forces R's to give a nod to the far right (read: crazies), it'd be nice for Hillary to actually have to prove her liberal bonafides.

Pragmatism is winning out over vision, which would be fine a year from now, but doesn't feel great today.
03-16-2015 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
Wasn't Obamacare more or less an idea that, like, the Heritage Foundation or some other righwing policy group proposed in response to Hillarycare?
Of course it was. But you can't expect the right to support their own plan when it's being endorsed by a black POTUS. Get with the program.
03-16-2015 , 11:49 AM
yeah republicans totally pushed for that program.... never of course BUT A THINK TANK CAME OUT FOR IT ONCE! RACISM DURR DERP

      
m