Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The CIA's Torture Campaign The CIA's Torture Campaign

12-11-2014 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martymc1
****ing hell.

Make Abe stop.
The forum needs a resident terrorism supporter, imo.
12-11-2014 , 10:58 AM
.
12-11-2014 , 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
But here’s what I can tell you —- that the public reports and the public justifications for these techniques -— which is that we got information from these individuals that were subjected to these techniques– doesn’t answer the core question, which is: Could we have gotten that same information without resorting to these techniques? And it doesn’t answer the broader question: Are we safer as a consequence of having used these techniques?"
Again, you are missing the whole point of the report, which is that the "public justifications" were CIA lies. The report said NO we DID NOT get useful information from torture. It didn't work. It did not accomplish what it was supposed to accomplish. The CIA lied.

That's a very important key point that you're having a hard time understanding. The program didn't work, and the CIA lied about it.

Quote:
Like I said, we will never know the truth on these matters. Obama said by his statement that there was information yielded.
That is not what Obama said. Read it again.
12-11-2014 , 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
So you're okay with what exactly? Just the waterboarding and other EITs, or are you fine with all the rest? Beating prisoners with sticks, raping them with sharp object, cutting off fingers and other limbs? How about electro shock, or stuff like having them slowly eaten by insects, or some ****? I mean there's lots of messed up ways to torture people, Do you draw the line anywhere, or are you just fine with going to the full Nazi play book from WWII?
Dick Cheney has an answer for you and it's this: “What are you prepared to do to get the truth against future attacks against the United States?”

The Abe Schmuckfeld's of the world endorse torturing people to death, so there's obviously no line to draw for them.

The funny thing about that Cheney article is that he admits he didn't read the report, offers no contrary facts or evidence, and just calls it "deeply flawed" and "full of crap".
12-11-2014 , 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
Obama's own words:

But here was President Obama:

" I am absolutely convinced it was the right thing to do [to end enhanced interrogation] —- not because there might not have been information that was yielded by these various detainees who were subjected to this treatment, but because we could have gotten this information in other ways, in ways that were consistent with our values, in ways that were consistent with who we are.

But here’s what I can tell you —- that the public reports and the public justifications for these techniques -— which is that we got information from these individuals that were subjected to these techniques– doesn’t answer the core question, which is: Could we have gotten that same information without resorting to these techniques? And it doesn’t answer the broader question: Are we safer as a consequence of having used these techniques?"


Like I said, we will never know the truth on these matters. Obama said by his statement that there was information yielded.
Nobody doubts that there was information yielded. Guess what -- any ****ing method will yield information. We could have you personally provide blowjobs to terror suspects and it would yield information, but it wouldn't make it right.
12-11-2014 , 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
So an article filled with half truths is supposed to be abe all end all? Hardly when there are officials that point out that without water boarding KSM we wouldn't have been able to thwart other attacks. You mean that article....gotcha

http://www.wsj.com/articles/louis-j-...sia-1418259652

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...the_means.html
One link is behind a paywall, and the other link is Dick Cheney on Fox.
12-11-2014 , 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDuker
Dick Cheney has an answer for you and it's this: “What are you prepared to do to get the truth against future attacks against the United States?”

The Abe Schmuckfeld's of the world endorse torturing people to death, so there's obviously no line to draw for them.

The funny thing about that Cheney article is that he admits he didn't read the report, offers no contrary facts or evidence, and just calls it "deeply flawed" and "full of crap".
For my country, I am personally willing to flip the switch and watch Dick Cheney die, should he ever face charges and get convicted for the crimes he's committed against the United States.

That would keep us a lot safer than anything that clown achieved.
12-11-2014 , 11:06 AM
Hey raradevils, given you have been wrong about, well, literally everything that you posted on through your entire posting history, why do you expect that you have any credibility here?

No one with any knowledge of your history actually believes anything besides that you are, once again, kowtowing to big government anytime it doesn't involve taxes.

No one believes you had "higher than top secret" clearance as like a 20 year old noted dullard.
12-11-2014 , 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Hey raradevils, given you have been wrong about, well, literally everything that you posted on through your entire posting history, why do you expect that you have any credibility here?

No one with any knowledge of your history actually believes anything besides that you are, once again, kowtowing to big government anytime it doesn't involve taxes.

No one believes you had "higher than top secret" clearance as like a 20 year old noted dullard.
I don't care that you don't believe me, you troll me when and where ever I post (in the political section of the forums)

um..I worked/did tours in communication on board submarines specifically the USS Sam Rayburn and USS Andrew Jackson.
12-11-2014 , 11:22 AM
Well, as someone else said, given your combination of posting history, low IQ, and desire to bootlick for authority as long as that authority isn't a black president, you don't have any credibility and you are getting mocked in the bad poster thread and ignored by the rest. Enjoy!
12-11-2014 , 11:23 AM
you think, as an enlisted man on a submarine, you had access to information that the Senate Intelligence Committee didnt see?

you saw information by accident that informs you more than a congressional committee that was investing the issue?
12-11-2014 , 11:24 AM
Not only that, he saw that information like 30 years ago.
12-11-2014 , 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
I don't care that you don't believe me, you troll me when and where ever I post (in the political section of the forums)

um..I worked/did tours in communication on board submarines specifically the USS Sam Rayburn and USS Andrew Jackson.
Did your politics ever influence your decision to be a submariner? Don't ask, Don't tell?...I kid, I kid

On a serious note, it seems like a decent amount of the rank-and file were against torture. Bloomberg Intercept
12-11-2014 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrawNone
you think, as an enlisted man on a submarine, you had access to information that the Senate Intelligence Committee didnt see?

you saw information by accident that informs you more than a congressional committee that was investing the issue?
I didn't see information by accident, it was my job to go thru the intel that was sent across the wires to take what was specifically sent to our ship/commander and give to him.

I was using my history as a reference as to how information gets reported and how that info varies from what actually happened.
12-11-2014 , 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Well, as someone else said, given your combination of posting history, low IQ, and desire to bootlick for authority as long as that authority isn't a black president, you don't have any credibility and you are getting mocked in the bad poster thread and ignored by the rest. Enjoy!
You might care what other people think about you, I don't.
12-11-2014 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
So how exactly did we get OBL? People just willingly gave him up for 3 squares and a cot?

If you think we didn't get any info from water boarding people I have a bridge to sell you that runs from NJ to NYC.
Maybe you should try researching the topic instead of just imagining how it worked.
12-11-2014 , 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
You might care what other people think about you, I don't.
Yeah, we understand that from your history of posting unresearched nonsense.
12-11-2014 , 11:54 AM
If you think government ought to be allowed to torture anyone, you don't get to claim to be for "limited government" anymore. Ever.
12-11-2014 , 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
I don't care that you don't believe me, you troll me when and where ever I post (in the political section of the forums)
Don't sweat it, it's standard practice for some reason. Still, you must realise that 'higher than top secret' isn't going to go down well unless you can offer something pretty solid.

I don't agree with you on this report though quite honestly that's in a large part because I didn't trust them or their practices an inch before the report and I have a fair bit of respect for Obama.

If the boot was on the other foot and it was a report justifying what they did then I would be pretty skeptical of it and I suspect so would they.
12-11-2014 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
The forum needs a resident terrorism supporter, imo.
No, we don't.
12-11-2014 , 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
No, we don't.
I think that could be a fun new under-title. "Torture Apologist." Frankly, I don't think Charles Krauthammer, Dick Cheney et al should be allowed to be brought up in polite company without this prefix.
12-11-2014 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turn Prophet
If you think government ought to be allowed to torture anyone, you don't get to claim to be for "limited government" anymore. Ever.
It's time for some people to just acknowledge that they're fascist scum. That's really all there is to say on the matter.
12-11-2014 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ineedaride2
One link is behind a paywall, and the other link is Dick Cheney on Fox.
ProTip: Any article behind a paywall can be accessed by using google
12-11-2014 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turn Prophet
If you think government ought to be allowed to torture anyone, you don't get to claim to be for "limited government" anymore. Ever.
People aren't allowed to think their government should treat It's citizens one way and foreign terrorist another?
12-11-2014 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stockguy3205
People aren't allowed to think their government should treat It's citizens one way and foreign terrorist another?
If they turn out not to be terrorists, well, just have to break a few brown skinned eggs to make an omelette amirite? Not like their lives matter anyways since they aren't part of USA#1

      
m