Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
I do wonder how likely it is, if the statues were to be put into a museum and the context around them explained, that that context would be that the statues were put up as a PR campaign to strengthen Jim Crow, as a reaction to the Civil Rights Movement, and as a continuing reassurance of white dominance.
Somehow I don't think the states would have that kind of fortitude to face the real reason they were put up. Maybe I'm wrong.
As I've written, while alt-right street thugs are highly visible manifestations of a deepening madness, MOST of the right are olds out in the hinterlands frothing about Merry Christmas and Kaepnernick just as much as they are upset about Confederate statues.
You need to talk to them in terms they understand. The way to talk to these people imo is to simply imply that Confederate statues were the 1880s versions of participation trophies. Statues of Robert E. Lee in town squares were given to losers to make them feel better about their losing effort. Real winners raise statues of Lincoln, Sherman, and United States Colored Troops brigades. Only millennial snowflakes would want a Participation Statue of Robert E Lee in their town.