Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Brexit Referendum Brexit Referendum

12-15-2018 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Wrong, as Major and Blair will have done whatever they did with the approval of parliament.

By that definition you don't get a say on any of our laws. Judging by your posts, this is no bad thing.
The only way major sovereign powers should be given up is by referenda. Not on the flip of a here today gone tomorrow numpty

If those two treaties had had referenda, we would not be in this position today imo.

Last edited by diebitter; 12-15-2018 at 09:25 AM.
12-15-2018 , 09:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
The only way major sovereign powers should be given up is by referenda.

If those two treaties had had referenda, we would not be in this position today imo.
Just for a second, think of every treaty we've ever signed that gives up some power. I assume you think our membership of NATO is illegitimate in that case?

It's an incredibly arbitrary rule you've got there. Almost like you made it up on the spot with no thought to what it actually means.
12-15-2018 , 09:18 AM
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum

Command and control applied selectively like da nazis.
12-15-2018 , 09:21 AM
The way it stands just now is fully in the EU we do have our sovereignty as we can leave at any point of our own choosing (Article 50).

Unfortunately this Theresa May "deal" truly does sign away our sovereignty due to the fact we cannot exit the backstop unless the EU agrees we can, nor is their a set time limit on it. We have never in our history completely signed away our powers like that before and it is mind boggling that the Prime Minister of the UK thinks this would be a good thing.
12-15-2018 , 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SootedPowa
The way it stands just now is fully in the EU we do have our sovereignty as we can leave at any point of our own choosing (Article 50).

Unfortunately this Theresa May "deal" truly does sign away our sovereignty due to the fact we cannot exit the backstop unless the EU agrees we can, nor is their a set time limit on it. We have never in our history completely signed away our powers like that before and it is mind boggling that the Prime Minister of the UK thinks this would be a good thing.
She's been schmoozed into it by EU 'assurances'
12-15-2018 , 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
The only way major sovereign powers should be given up is by referenda. Not on the flip of a here today gone tomorrow numpty

If those two treaties had had referenda, we would not be in this position today imo.
This is a matter of opinion. It is a matter of fact that you were wrong.
12-15-2018 , 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
She's been schmoozed into it by EU 'assurances'
Agree, but that is completely incompetent from a prime minister. It's pretty clear to anyone with a brain what is going to happen in the medium-long term if that deal is ratified.

What's even more scary is how she is using every single one of the powers at her disposal to try and get it through.
12-15-2018 , 09:34 AM
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum

Smchoozed into it folks. If only BJ or JRM were in charge. They’re not for schmoozing.
12-15-2018 , 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SootedPowa
It's pretty clear to anyone with a brain what is going to happen in the medium-long term.


Yup.
12-15-2018 , 09:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diebitter
No.

I and many others want to stop the EU command and control over the UK
This kind of thinking is so low level that it has a lot to do with why the EU is able to reconcile itself to the brexit. The UK is like a spouse that doesn't look that good anymore, never wants sex, generates a lot of headaches, and whines a lot about sovereignty. Suddently the spouse proposes divorce and the other, rejected spouse at first has some doubts, but after watching the meltdown and fighting over who gets to walk the dog on Tuesdays, finds that it's easier to come terms with ceding custody of the children, who are sort of a bother anyway, and starts looking for a younger Eastern European to live with.
12-15-2018 , 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiMor29
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum

Smchoozed into it folks. If only BJ or JRM were in charge. They’re not for schmoozing.
She is incompetent and only cares for her own legacy of "delivering brexit". Without a doubt the worst prime minister of all of our lifetimes.

The EU must not have believed their luck at having to face a UK negotiating team comprising soley of Theresa May.

We need someone firm who would not make empty threats and if there cannot be an acceptable compromise (where the UK can unilaterally exit the backstop and spill into a no deal scenario) then we leave on 29th March 2019 on WTO terms with no payments made.
12-15-2018 , 09:48 AM
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum.

Yes, not fulfilling our already decided obligations is a great strategy. I can just imagine BJ, cap in hand, triumphantly declaring that we’ll leave and we’ll pay nowt! I almost hope it happens just for the headlines.
12-15-2018 , 10:10 AM
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum still laughing at the prospect of the uk leaving without paying their dues. It’s funnier if you implant BJ or JRM actually saying it.
12-15-2018 , 10:12 AM
Seriously please tell me this isn’t really the leavers preferred strategy? Brexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum if so it really highlights the point that they definitely hate them some brown people, so much so that they’ll not only cut off their noses but cut off their entire heads. Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum
12-15-2018 , 10:15 AM
Hello biggest trading partner. Go **** yourself we ain’t paying for all those things we bought. Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum
12-15-2018 , 10:26 AM
Can some mod just give simor the undertitle Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum to save him a bit of time?
12-15-2018 , 10:59 AM
I like your thinking, however, that’s gonna get a bit dark come April. I’m up for it if come March 29 it can be replaced with Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum
12-15-2018 , 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoe1337
Just for a second, think of every treaty we've ever signed that gives up some power. I assume you think our membership of NATO is illegitimate in that case?

It's an incredibly arbitrary rule you've got there. Almost like you made it up on the spot with no thought to what it actually means.
If Nato has primacy of Law or usurping of sovereign power, I'd want a ref on it.
12-15-2018 , 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SootedPowa
Agree, but that is completely incompetent from a prime minister. It's pretty clear to anyone with a brain what is going to happen in the medium-long term if that deal is ratified.

What's even more scary is how she is using every single one of the powers at her disposal to try and get it through.
And lied about the nature of the legal advice. Blatantly lied.
12-15-2018 , 11:42 AM
PS I think we should pay what we agreed to pay, even though TM was idiotic for agreeing it with absolutely nothing else agreed.

However, to quote the EU's assorted mouthpieces that they call "presidents": 'nothing is agreed till everything is agreed'.

How come that doesn't apply here?
12-15-2018 , 11:58 AM
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum

There’s a difference between future trade deals and paying for **** you’ve already bought.
12-15-2018 , 12:07 PM
Brexit ReferendumBrexit ReferendumBrexit Referendum

They’re actually thinking about it. Too funny. We’re living within a parody.
12-15-2018 , 12:09 PM
^ Depends what it is though. To extend bacalaopeace's marriage metaphor, we wouldn't expect to continue paying the mortgage on a house we no longer live in, whereas we would expect to continue paying for a kid that was still our kid.

So if they want us out of the satellite thing then fine but they have to buy us out of it or we just keep what work we've done up to now. Already planed EU aid programmes should be paid for though.

Honest question:

Regarding NATO, if we weren't already a member from way back, then would we be ok about joining now without a referendum?
12-15-2018 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
^ Depends what it is though. To extend bacalaopeace's marriage metaphor, we wouldn't expect to continue paying the mortgage on a house we no longer live in, whereas we would expect to continue paying for a kid that was still our kid.

So if they want us out of the satellite thing then fine but they have to buy us out of it or we just keep what work we've done up to now. Already planed EU aid programmes should be paid for though.
We are out of the satellite thing because we are walking out on it. What they owe us or do not owe is dictated either by existing agreements on what happens when a member leaves or by negotiation.
12-16-2018 , 08:35 AM
May's cabinet appears to be forming into three distinct groups: Hard line Brexiters headed by the born-again Brexiter Hunt who favour what they call a "managed no deal"; a Norway Plus group spearhead by Rudd; and a referendum group including Liddington the Cabinet Secrtary.

None of the groups appears strong enough to command a majority or to impose its will on May.

Quote:
Failed by both its major parties, the biggest loser of all is Brexit-broken Britain. Our country is careening towards disaster. All of its political institutions know this. None of them seems capable of arresting it. They continue to play their games of charades as we lurch towards the abyss.
Article

      
m