Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Active/recent terrorist acts catch-all thread Active/recent terrorist acts catch-all thread

10-02-2017 , 05:28 PM
Logged on to Facebook. Logged out.
10-02-2017 , 05:28 PM
Might be time to talk about mental health.
10-02-2017 , 05:29 PM
One of the band members has torn up his Leopards Eating People's Faces Party membership card:

Quote:
But guitarist Caleb Keeter went further, describing the ordeal as a revelation.

“I’ve been a proponent of the [second] amendment my entire life,” he postedon Twitter. “Until the events of last night. I cannot express how wrong I was.”
Keeter said that members of the band’s crew have concealed handgun licenses, and legal firearms on the bus.

“They were useless. We couldn’t touch them for fear police might think that we were part of the massacre and shoot us. A small group (or one man) laid waste to a city with dedicated, fearless police officers desperately trying to help, because of access to an insane amount of firepower. Enough is enough.”
10-02-2017 , 05:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark


gjge Mandalay Bay security
I don't think any hotel on the strip would've stopped this dude.
10-02-2017 , 05:34 PM
He probably hadn't broken any laws until he broke the window in the hotel room...
10-02-2017 , 05:34 PM
im sure most of those rifles could be disassembled to some extent, the hotel isnt going to be searching peoples' bags and ****

not to mention they'd all be legal for him to possess in nevada anyway
10-02-2017 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark


gjge Mandalay Bay security
What were they supposed to do about it?
10-02-2017 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
im sure most of those rifles could be disassembled to some extent, the hotel isnt going to be searching peoples' bags and ****

not to mention they'd all be legal for him to possess in nevada anyway
I'm fairly sure you can't open carry in Casinos. Not that it is necessarily against the law, but against Casino policies. I'd guess their hotel security would have issues with him had it only been a pistol and they spotted it.
10-02-2017 , 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
I don't think any hotel on the strip would've stopped this dude.
Exactly. How are they supposed to stop him?
10-02-2017 , 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-In Flynn
One of the band members has torn up his Leopards Eating People's Faces Party membership card:
Yeah about that notion that a good guy with a gun stops a bad guy with a gun. If the bad guy plans ahead the good guy's guns can be rendered useless by a) position (behind cover 1500' away, 32 stories up) or b) fear of being shot by cops (which happened in Dallas when all the open-carry guys immediately dropped their guns and ran away out of fear of getting shot by cops). Usually b.

Seems like a perfect set of circumstances have to happen for a regular citizen to stop or mitigate a mass shooting. Has to be a) no cops around yet, b) more or less stationary shooter approachable from some angle or reloading, c) regular citizen who has the nerve to risk their life in the moment and take a shot at a heavily armed assailant when it's rarely clear there's only one. Obviously ex-police or military is a different story.
10-02-2017 , 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
I'm fairly sure you can't open carry in Casinos. Not that it is necessarily against the law, but against Casino policies. I'd guess their hotel security would have issues with him had it only been a pistol and they spotted it.
Casinos aren't on the federally banned list so they could ask him to leave, but that's about it. If he refuses, they can have him arrested for trespassing.
10-02-2017 , 05:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
I'm fairly sure you can't open carry in Casinos. Not that it is necessarily against the law, but against Casino policies. I'd guess their hotel security would have issues with him had it only been a pistol and they spotted it.
i never once mentioned anything about open carrying bro, pretty sure all casinos have rules of some sort against that for obvious reasons
10-02-2017 , 05:47 PM
I seriously wonder how the NRA people sleep at night. What scum.
10-02-2017 , 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
I seriously wonder how the NRA people sleep at night. What scum.
https://shareblue.com/nra-pulls-atta...ter-in-8-days/
Quote:
The NRA has often gone silent after mass shootings, as it has this time, with the hopes that it can wait out grief after the tragedy. Then, when the conditions are more favorable for its violent messages, the NRA promotes advertising that calls on gun owners to confront protesters with a “clenched fist.”
10-02-2017 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
i never once mentioned anything about open carrying bro, pretty sure all casinos have rules of some sort against that for obvious reasons
I didn't mean to thrust the open carry part of what I said to the forefront. I was merely trying to point out that (I'm going to take a wild guess) hotel and casino security would intervene if they spot guns for the safety of their clientele.
10-02-2017 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl


https://twitter.com/ddale8/status/914917264759115779

Anytime anyone dies by a gun Chicago has to be mentioned
I love the people who cite Chicago gun laws as some kind of show stopping response to any argument in favor of control. It's like the very concept of a multi-variable problem has never even occurred to them.
10-02-2017 , 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
Seems like a perfect set of circumstances have to happen for a regular citizen to stop or mitigate a mass shooting.
And of course the best evidence for this is that there have been literally hundreds of these kinds of shootings in the past decade and there have been...zero "good guys with a gun"?
10-02-2017 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
A handgun, at 400 yards... isn't going to work.
Yes, it's not.
10-02-2017 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-In Flynn
One of the band members has torn up his Leopards Eating People's Faces Party membership card:
But I didn't think they would eat my face!
10-02-2017 , 06:02 PM
A guy with a gun on the ground at the concert would have zero impact on the outcome in Las Vegas. These are called soft targets for a reason. He had the high ground, the advantage of surprise, and relative concealment. By the time anyone found out where it was coming from, it was over. And to be honest, I'm surprised more were not killed. I'd like to see a timeline of events after the first shot was fired. Did he run out of ammo? He killed himself before LE gained entry into his room.
10-02-2017 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
Yes, it's not.
What?! I can think of nothing more effective than a couple thousand country music fans taking aim at a hotel 400 yards away with handguns.
10-02-2017 , 06:04 PM
So I think here's a good time to point out that I used to own two firearms, a .38 caliber S&W handgun and a .22 Survival rifle. I was a prosecutor who prosecuted violent felons and murderers and have recieved in my career more than one death threat. But the second I found out my wife was pregnant (and while still working in law enforcement) I promptly got rid of all guns, and I am more than confident that was a +EV decision. I'm sorry but people who are keeping guns for "self-defense" are committing a logical fallacy when evaluating the chances of those guns helping them and their family versus the much much higher chances of those guns hurting them and their family. They are the same tards who think the roulette history wheel can help them, or who think they're going to hit their flush this time because they're "due."
10-02-2017 , 06:04 PM
18+ weapons, explosives, and thousands of rounds in his room.
10-02-2017 , 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
So I think here's a good time to point out that I used to own two firearms, a .38 caliber S&W handgun and a .22 Survival rifle. I was a prosecutor who prosecuted violent felons and murderers and have recieved in my career more than one death threat. But the second I found out my wife was pregnant I promptly got rid of all guns, and I am more than confident that was a +EV decision. I'm sorry but people who are keeping guns for "self-defense" are committing a logical fallacy when evaluating the chances of those guns helping them and their family versus the much much higher chances of those guns hurting them and their family.
If they're properly and responsibly stored, how do they hurt the family?
10-02-2017 , 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggymike
The longer you look at the issues the more you’ll see we’re actually right on all of them. That said I recall this account belonging to a troll/crazy person so I don’t know if this is a good development or not. Also no chance Trump does a thing about guns, sorry, it’s one of his only reliable platforms:
i say that trump does something that obama could not do and that is put his foot up the nra's ass. letsas watch for further devolpments

      
m