ok grunching a bit but this is tilting me because i keep seeing these 3 names pop up

there are LOTS of forum regs who spent considerable amounts of money and time on this election and seeing the praise limited to the couple accounts that were most vocal in the past 36 hours is making me a tad salty

Most of ads were of white guys who had drug problems in their past. They then showed them with their own businesses, picture perfect families, working charity events etc. No black people anywhere to be seen.


There is still a lot of racists in rural Florida. The old south is slowly going away but its still alive.

Okay, so seriously, what states are possible Senate pickups in 2020?

I will grant Colorado and Maine right off the bat. After that....?

So it turns out Ohio is pretty damn deplorable. Shocker.

In addition to electing a republican governor, again, and Balderson winning, again, Issue 1 (reduce sentences for drug offenses, spend savings on treatment) got smoked 2-1. There are just so so many stupid old white racists in this state.

Lol **** off turd ive been posting about my involvement in ca 48 going back at least 8 months. Maybe longer.

Of course there are regs that did a lot

Dude who helped ECOT scam the state out of $600 MILLION dollars got re-elected, whole state is full of dumbasses, basically.

We should because it is definitely a litmus test for the integrity of our vote. If Georgia can get away with this, you think other states won't try election ****ery themselves?

Got to hand it to North Carolina. Dems get over half the house vote and end up with a quarter of the contested seats. Won their races by an average 45 point margin to the Republican's 11.

A Democrat's house vote in NC is worth less than half that of a Republican, easy game.

One other horrible change in Florida’s Constitution was made last night. Amendment 6 passed, which among other things ends administrative deference.

What was the source for the exit poll graphic last night that showed only old whites voting Republican? Have tried unsuccessfully to find it.

Im referring to this. What is the source for this.

i know you love the attention, but my post wasn't an insult directed towards you so idk why you're all rustled

I haven't caught up yet, but thanks for the work you did.

****ing Green party

So sick Wenatchee Went blue? Lol

i mean its crazy there are 2+2ers who actually ran for office and i didn't even know about it. some old school MTT reg Dcal Zone (?) and apparently even Parlay Slow's wife won something or another.

i'm not looking for any personal thanks, i just wanted to point out that the collective effort here was strong and that maybe what we're doing does actually matter a little bit.

If Mueller doesn’t indict Rohabacher what are we even doing here anymore?

Point and a half is a huge margin there. Well played by Rouda. **** Dana with all the things

I've come all the way around on health care as an election issue. I never thought it was trivial, but I now think it is absolutely critical as a theme, especially in key states.

Coastal Orange County being red is/was gross. The Central Valley being red? Well, that's the way rural America is. It's gross still, but that's their culture. The rich South OC Republicans are just bastards. 30 miles away in rich LA County beach cities Ted Lieu won by 36 points.

Good first step if OC gets rid of Rohrbacker.

Nelson called for a recount. Doubt it helps. But fak it.

Yeah healthcare is huge which was also one of the disappointing things with Gillum, he came out the gate supporting medicare for all and then backtracked to the centrist position of affordable healthcare.

I get why the general public is writing off 538 for their real time forecast last night but I expected 2+2ers to be more sophisticated consumers of data.

Someone mentioned this earlier, but it's clear to me that they're (1) pretty damn good, maybe best in class, at projecting elections in advance, and (2) awful at projecting real time on election night.

#2 is really tough and I don't think anyone public-facing is doing it well. The NYT messed this up badly last time, right? I think they had Hillary 98% to win around 9:00 eastern in 2016. I mean, even a quick glance at 538's methodology could have told you their real time figures were worthless.

If you extrapolate incompetence at #2 into implied incompetence at #1, you're telling on yourself. The "OMG ILL NEVER TRUST NATE AGAIN" takes are silly.

Lol you literally mentioned me by name in your whiny ass post

538 swung from 90% Dem win to 60% GOP win at one point. It doesn't seem like it really adds any value or predicative capability to the conversation. It's like people saying "Oh it's at x% on predictit." Well predictit doesn't mean jack **** either.