Quote:
Originally Posted by BreakYaNeck
Oh you mean the same polls that said Trump had absolutely no chance at winning? Got it.
While there were a few
models, if I recall correctly, that gave Trump ~0% chance of winning the polling itself was actually pretty good. Better than 2012, in fact.
Those models were probably wrong, for various reasons, and for sure there were overconfident posters on the internet (and probably on cable news as well), but there were other more reasonable models that were probably correct.
FiveThirtyEight's model, for example, gave Trump a 28.2% chance to win on election day, and there is little evidence that that figure was too high.
As it was, in reality, Trump walked a pretty narrow tightrope to win PA (0.7%), Michigan (0.3%), and Wisconsin (0.7%) while losing the national vote by 2.1%.
There is a lot of time left before 2020, and things can change, but it does not look good for him at present. He basically needs to hold on to
all of his 2016 support (and hold on here means they need to actually vote for him, not just say they still support him)
and have turnout for the Democrats not increase.
Even if nothing happens except that a small number of Trump supporters stay home (the enthusiasm and novelty is likely going to be lower next time), and no additional democrats come out to vote, Trump still likely loses in 2020.