http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/communist...ehind-hillary/

Who's the communist Trump is fawning over?

You realize an awful lot of the "OLDS" today voted for McGovern over Nixon in 1972. Then we wised up.

Plenty of you kids will, too....................

Good find. Time to convene HUAC!

because we're nuts and believe a fact-based discussion of "what the future president will do" will be heavily biased to someone who has been so close to presidents for so long. especially when she's against a guy who hasn't even been mayor of anything. but you're right a lot of people are motivated by fear and like turning their brains off


me: hey vote for me

america: why?

me: because i will make everything great for everyone

america: how?

me: i don't know because i have no idea what the president actually does or can do

Hillary supporters will think she won even if she pees in her pants.

They go back to the very racist group The Birch Society. White Power is not their driving issue, but they are very comfortable around it.

That was very much not my point though. They fomented racism because drawing some kind of working class people into their movement was essential and Ayn Rand wasn't widely read at the KKK meetings. And, of course, they needed voter suppression of people who voted the wrong way.

As a more specific example of ideology that went hand in hand with racists, Charles Murray, Author of The Bell Curve, was a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute where David Koch serves on the council and the Koch Network provides much of the funding.

Interesting. I should read more about them since they largely fund the extreme right.

That's good. No name calling and allows for healthy debate.

Trump knows what a good slimy salesperson knows. You never say you don't know. You say "trust me" "believe me" etc. The last line there is: "Believe me. I know how to do it and fast. Starting day one."

Sold.

Again, you made another major jump in logic. 40% support trump. That does not mean all 40% are racist nazi skin heads. Voting for or suportting trump does not automatically make someone a racist. How can you possibly assume that? Have you, you know, thought that maybe they hate hillary and everything her track records say so much they go trump?

Where did I say everything is fine and dandy in good ol usa? Lol dude again major logic jump. I said there are tons of decent good Americans.... who have been misled and manipulated for decades.

Haha If you could actually score debates with points I would bet my net worth to a nickel that Hill would win.

I'm in California so it doesn't matter, but I think all of you in swing states should get bumper stickers that say "I LOVE FREEDOM" and "GARY JOHNSON".

This is a thing that Trump supporters are legit proud of - just blind disbelief in the media when the proof is right in front of them. Reams of evidence that show Trump is corrupt, has no idea what he's doing, has a pathetically simplistic world view that involves heavy stereotyping, coddles racist right wing-extremists...but they'll show us! The Republican Party has truly gotten what they deserve, a nation of uninformed, scared people who can't parse out truth from fiction, getting pied pipered by their candidate; only catch is that the candidate is a legit threat to American democracy. But hey at least he'd cut taxes and appoint justices who will do their bidding, so win-win as long as we don't have a nuclear apocalypse.

Trump is a dangerous know nothing with no clue about foreign or domestic policy. He's trying to run for POTUS as a brand.

I really don't love HRC and complained about some of the same things during the primaries. I wouldn't vote for Rubio or w/e, but I might stay out of the argument. But, Trump is a disaster regardless of whether he's evil or not.

Lol you are completely missing this/ not thinking it through. If you can admit to yourself (lol at expecting you fools to admit it itt) that hillary clinton is a huge pos/ horrible for the average citizen, and we all know trump is horrible too....

It's not about voting for the candidate you hate less... No no no.. The right decision is voting for the candidate who would be least effective at accomplishing anything.

I'm seeing similarities between guys equating a trump presidency to brexit in that they think it will be the end of the world (lol like those year 2000 conspiracy tards). And guess what... It's not the end of the world. Our gov is set up so that it is extremely hard for any person or party to have complete control of our gov... And even if they do it is extremely hard to pass anything through... USA isn't a dictatorship guys...

Trump would destroy the EPA whether or not he could actually eliminate it. Trump would be a nightmare for the environment and he absolutely would be able to accomplish a lot of damage.

This is an impressively bad logic fail, even for this thread.

You post a lot of what you think will happen... Just like the year 2000 tards and the brexit fearmongerers. Once again-- our gov is not a dictatorship and everyone on both sides despises the man/ thinks he's a nutjob.

Goat

They've been so propagandized by their 'alternative media,' it's hilarious. They've been manipulated into disdain for elites, while naturally predisposed to inferiority because they know in their most genuine moments that they're garbage. But like any good Christian, they essentially just 'breathe Jesus' when confronted by this realization errr devil whispering in their ear.

The EPA is a government department and Trump would be the executive in charge of it. He would have a ton of leeway, independent of Congress, over what it does or fails to do.

Trump wants to appoint Supreme Court justices who would reverse social progress made over the last 60 plus years, including restrictions on both voting and women's access to abortion. Even though neither of these affect me they are huge concerns to me in the way they affect the nation. Granted these are standard Republican positions but these are things that he can 100% do. Trump probably won't get "his" things done (save for killing the estate tax) since he has no actual ideas but he will further the worst parts of the conservative agenda while also being a massive wild card for foreign relations.

I don't think you understand the the power of the presidency.

Not to mention they are also commander in chief and get to choose which existing laws to enforce.

Educate me Clovis. Browse through the brexit thread. Look at this thread. They are strikingly similar in that people think it's the end of the world if x passes.

"executive orders are subject to judicial review, and may be struck down if deemed by the courts to be unsupported by statute or the Constitution. Major policy initiatives require approval by the legislative branch"

It's true they have leeway. But to think this nut job is going to get to do whatever the **** he pleases is so lol. Read up on how the gov was designed.