Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2016 Presidential Election Thread: TRUMP vs. Hillary SMACKDOWN 2016 Presidential Election Thread: TRUMP vs. Hillary SMACKDOWN
View Poll Results: The 45th President of the United States of America will be
Hillary
332 46.63%
TRUMP
190 26.69%
In to watch it burn
161 22.61%
Bastard
73 10.25%
im tryin to tell you about ****in my wife in the *** and youre asking me these personal questions
57 8.01%

10-19-2016 , 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plutarch
Depends on what products you are talking about.

Phones made in the USA? Sure.

Food (grains, wheat, corn, etc), oil and gas, miltary equipment, aircraft, and other stuff they are unable to manufacture but desperately require? I doubt it.

We sold tons of wheat to the USSR during the Cold War. China will soon require our surplus grains as more of their farmland turns to desert and dust. The USA is a Food Superpower. It's a thing. Look it up.

blah, blah, blah phone manufacture is too unskilled to do here, USA, USA, USA!..but wait, what?

Apple's $100m made-in-the-USA Mac facility will be in Texas


Tim Cook even says that phones are manufactured in China and Asia due to the lack of skills here in the USA, which is partially true. Consumer electronics manufacture has always been based in Asia (since the Sony Walkman anyway). But Cook is also trying to obscure the fact that Apple sits on over $230B in cash due to China's obscenely low wages caused by the mechanization of China's farmland, same as in Mexico, which forced millions of small farmers out of the fields and into the cities in search of work and food, which drove labor wages through the floor.

Anyway, Comaparative Advantage has zero to do with the price of labor inputs and everytyhing to do with the quantity of labor inputs. If labor quantity is the same to produce a given product in both counries, then there is no Comparative Advantage. Case Closed. End of Story. It is why spices were bought in Asia and wine in France: because their climate and soil made their products better and gave them a Comparative Advantage. Running around saying that China has a Comparative Advantage because they are paid 76 cents a day or w/e makes you look like a stooge. It certainly shows that you never read Ricardo, or read him poorly, and have only an Econ 101 understanding of Classical Economics.
lol. China has comparative advantage in low-skill labor because US workers are better educated and can do high-skill jobs.
10-19-2016 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutangpoker
I made a friendly wager that Evan Mcmullin will win Utah. He's laying me 3:1. Good?
3:1 = very good

Last edited by Paul McSwizzle; 10-19-2016 at 11:02 PM. Reason: 1. mcmuf 2. $hillary 3. drumpf
10-19-2016 , 11:05 PM
Does Mcmullin hurt Trump more or Hilary more?
10-19-2016 , 11:07 PM
hurts drumpf but tbh its not a factor

he might lose utah, nothing else is really at risk unless mcmuffinmania goes wild in the next cpl weeks
10-19-2016 , 11:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
hurts drumpf but tbh its not a factor

he might lose utah, nothing else is really at risk unless mcmuffinmania goes wild in the next cpl weeks
yeah, if you look at replies to his twitter posts, it's mostly petrified trumpkins calling him a hillary plant or false equivocators wondering why he won't bash hillary equally (because he's working for her LDO)
10-19-2016 , 11:13 PM
so CNN is like, "We have to have at least two horrible people on our 16-person panel else we're not fair and balanced"
10-19-2016 , 11:14 PM
McMuffin = fun side piece and nothing more
10-19-2016 , 11:17 PM
I mean tell me why Jeffrey Lord is employed anywhere
10-19-2016 , 11:20 PM
Wow, listening to Trump's kid talk, (not the one who looks like he belongs in a twilight movie, the dark haired one) he would have slaughtered her in a debate.

Trump is just too old, slow, and mad.
10-19-2016 , 11:20 PM
He's an awful person. Glad alexlrod and van jones are starting to go after him and Kayleigh more now that the final debate is finished.
10-19-2016 , 11:22 PM
Kayleigh/Lord gonna be out of a job after Trump loses?
10-19-2016 , 11:22 PM
Hillary is winning Breitbart's online poll.
10-19-2016 , 11:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 425kid
Hillary is winning Breitbart's online poll.
lol
10-19-2016 , 11:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
Right, because I'm qualified to determine if the case is "extremely compelling." I know jack about genetics (although I know enough to dismiss magic as a theory, I suppose). But there are absolutely compelling reasons for researching the topic according to Steven Pinker, a very well regarded cognitive scientist. He makes that case very well in one of those "garbage sources" and frankly it's anti-science to continue to dismiss such theories just because you find it an entertaining way to troll.
I think the genetic racial superiority of Jews is a preposterous and utterly discredited bit of horse****. You don't! You think it's a compelling idea and can't even help but name-drop Pinker in order to defend this garbage. You think these ideas are "absolutely compelling" and that the case is made "very well." Take that garbage back to SMP.
10-19-2016 , 11:31 PM
Axelrod makes Lord look so bad.
10-19-2016 , 11:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
itsallthiswaseverabout.jpg
10-19-2016 , 11:32 PM
Van Jones for explainer in chief
10-19-2016 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul McSwizzle
McMuffin = fun side piece and nothing more
Imo mcmuffin will be the front runner in 2020
10-19-2016 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
I think the genetic racial superiority of Jews is a preposterous and utterly discredited bit of horse****. You don't! You think it's a compelling idea and can't even help but name-drop Pinker in order to defend this garbage. You think these ideas are "absolutely compelling" and that the case is made "very well." Take that garbage back to SMP.

It's a problem for science when people mischaracterize genetic research of intelligence as attempting to prove "racial superiority" of Jews. As Pinker argues, not only is there no Jewish race, but there is very compelling evidence for a genetic role in intelligence. Stop derailing this thread with your lame attempts to turn me into a Jewish supremacist please.
10-19-2016 , 11:44 PM
stop (((aidsing up the thread)))
10-19-2016 , 11:50 PM
Donna Brazille just gave the worst interview of all time she is a ****in moron
10-19-2016 , 11:53 PM
^ That.

EDIT:



weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
10-19-2016 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
I think the genetic racial superiority of Jews is a preposterous and utterly discredited bit of horse****. You don't! You think it's a compelling idea and can't even help but name-drop Pinker in order to defend this garbage. You think these ideas are "absolutely compelling" and that the case is made "very well." Take that garbage back to SMP.
You brought this PU stuff here trolly.

Don't blame SMP or anyone else for it.
10-20-2016 , 12:01 AM
I'm not watching a 10 minute yootoob but I watched like the last 30 seconds and they were painful to watch. What the **** was that go to Russia signoff?
10-20-2016 , 12:03 AM
She's pretty MAD that the questions about her feeding a debate question verbatim to HRC were based on evidence from the Russian hack.

Before that it's actually more of a disaster, probably worth the ten minutes. Fiery garbage conflagration doesn't quite reach the level of ineptitude in this interview.

      
m