2016 Presidential Election Thread: TRUMP vs. Hillary SMACKDOWN - Page 1697 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

2016 Presidential Election Thread: TRUMP vs. Hillary SMACKDOWN

View Poll Results: The 45th President of the United States of America will be

Hillary

332 46.63%

TRUMP

190 26.69%

In to watch it burn

161 22.61%

Bastard

73 10.25%

im tryin to tell you about ****in my wife in the *** and youre asking me these personal questions

57 8.01%

...

Page 1697 of 1918

First

697 1197 1497 1597 1647 1677 1687 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1707 1717 1747 1797 1897

Last

Page 1697 of 1918

First

697 1197 1497 1597 1647 1677 1687 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1707 1717 1747 1797 1897

Last

11-01-2016 , 02:49 PM

#42401

chezlaw

Limey Bastard

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 46,986

Quote:

Originally Posted by aflametotheground

she cant be impeached for matters that took place before she was put into office 20.january, so no.

Is this correct?

11-01-2016 , 02:50 PM

#42402

GBP04

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 7,941

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zimmer4141

I love this fantasy world Right wingers live in where Hillary and Huma have to discuss classified information through email and have no other means of communication with each other.

[ ] right winger

It's certainly true that they have other means of communication but Hillary has already showed a less than passionate regard for national security (either through ignorance or intent). I don't see why it's even the slightest leap to think that some of these emails may contain classified info? (I mean the FBI literally did admit that they were pertinent to the investigation).

regardless your post doesn't really make sense. Doesn't donna brazile have other means of communication with podesta?

11-01-2016 , 02:50 PM

#42403

GBP04

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 7,941

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baltimore Jones

Is your last line a reference to the SNG instruction video that circulated in 2005-6ish?

the professor!

11-01-2016 , 02:51 PM

#42404

DVaut1

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 30,005

Also I can see the deplorable signal went up over America and the Trump slappies are getting their last giddiness in on the BOMBSHELL news that has ROCKED the campaign and left Clinton as roughly a 75% favorite.

11-01-2016 , 02:51 PM

#42405

TimmayB

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 12,086

Quote:

Originally Posted by BAIDS

HUDGE IF TRUE

Spoiler:

That's a follower. Apparently she unfollowed Hillary. Unless I'm misunderstanding how twitter works which is completely possible. But yeah prolly nothing.

11-01-2016 , 02:52 PM

#42406

pokerjunkie101

banned

Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 133

Quote:

Originally Posted by aflametotheground

she cant be impeached for matters that took place before she was put into office 20.january, so no.

Are you actually rooting for this?

You liberals are so boring. The ship is sinking as it is, at least Trump will make things fun as we fun as we continue to go down.

11-01-2016 , 02:53 PM

#42407

pokerjunkie101

banned

Join Date: Aug 2016 Posts: 133

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVaut1

Hilary thinks her voters are deplorable too. Hope you aren't fooled.

11-01-2016 , 02:54 PM

#42408

GBP04

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 7,941

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib

I'm not sure "diligent" is the word for wasting years and millions of tax payer dollars trying to smear a political opponent

meh I figured that would be what was highlighted. not everyone in this forum is constantly making some sort of value judgement.

Quote:

dil·i·gent
ˈdiləjənt/Submit
adjective
having or showing care and conscientiousness in one's work or duties.
"many caves are located only after a diligent search"
synonyms: industrious, hard-working, assiduous, conscientious, particular, punctilious, meticulous, painstaking, rigorous, careful, thorough, sedulous, earnest; More

11-01-2016 , 02:54 PM

#42409

Chips Ahoy

help me help you

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 28,869

Quote:

Originally Posted by chezlaw

Is this correct?

Quite implausible. Anything the house views as high crimes and misdemeanors is fair game. It's up to them, there is no review.

11-01-2016 , 02:54 PM

#42410

BAIDS

2013 FA Cup winner

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 32,645

nevermind tim i misread your poast, my image shows that hillary is following warren not the other way round

its confirmed all over for killary, reddit has cracked the case once again

pay whoever had unfollowgate in the 2+2 pool

11-01-2016 , 02:57 PM

#42411

master3004

Revisionist Historian

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 56,420

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBP04

I think Clinton is cooked.

best guess is that every email involving both her and Huma over the last ten years or so is on that laptop. Of that amount there's presumably some classified emails that the FBI has seen already (the ones that the FBI identified when they made their decision this summer). She deleted the rest of her (supposedly personal) emails from her server, but obviously didn't have access to this laptop so they'll be on there. so the FBI is going to easily be able to compare which emails she turned over with the ones she didn't. and if there are any they haven't seen before that contain classified information she's going to be in a world of hurt.

of course I could be totally wrong on this but it seems like a very distinct possibility.

My guess is that the emails between her and Huma finally prove the Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy. Unfortunately it will be too late. Once Clinton is elected she will pass an executive order granting total control of the US to the SA Sheikh and building a monument of 9/11 on the shores of New Jersey

11-01-2016 , 02:57 PM

#42412

RV Life

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 1,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBP04

Old people suck at the cyber. Breaking news at 11 PM.

11-01-2016 , 02:58 PM

#42413

Zimmer4141

Wet

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 33,671

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVaut1

You'd think somewhere in their lesbian trysts and plotting to let the Muslim Brotherhood seize the controls of power they'd just verbally tell each other the good classified gossip.

Also, if Huma has access to classified information, is it even illegal for Hillary to send her emails with classified information?

11-01-2016 , 02:58 PM

#42414

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

Quote:

Originally Posted by raradevils

So he hired very good accountants. Should that be construed as a negative?

LOL rara, his attorneys told him it was sketchy and would probably not stand up to audit, I think he kinda didn't listen to what his hired experts told him?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Finetome

1. Hillary hits an all time low. passes trump in unfavorable ratings making history not once but twice in the same election cycle.

2. 3 archives supposedly filled with hc emails are found on mr weiners computer in a file saved as "life insurance". the file name probably fabricated but its still hilarious.

3. 5 separate FBI offices are now investing hillary / the foundation.

4. The DNC chair and a CNN employee is being fired (from both?) for leaking debate questions to hillary. you know its a really hot potato when even CNN wont spin it.

5. in light of everything the obamas have edited their twitters.

popcorn. what a great week to be a hillary supporter.

11-01-2016 , 02:59 PM

#42415

13ball

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 12,912

Quote:

Originally Posted by GBP04

-if any of those emails contain classified content, and were not turned over to the FBI during the investigation, she is in a problem.

Seems doubtful. You would have to prove that Clinton knowingly deleted the email(s) in question. We already know emails were deleted, but there was nothing tying Clinton to the deletion.

Just classified info in the new emails wouldn't change anything legally. You would need some evidence that Clinton was trying to obstruct. Or, possibly, evidence of intentionally mishandling classified info.

11-01-2016 , 03:00 PM

#42416

GBP04

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 7,941

Quote:

Originally Posted by RV Life

Old people suck at the cyber. Breaking news at 11 PM.

Baron Trump is the best at cyber. you wouldn't believe it.

11-01-2016 , 03:03 PM

#42417

GBP04

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 7,941

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zimmer4141

Also, if Huma has access to classified information, is it even illegal for Hillary to send her emails with classified information?

obviously that wouldn't be illegal.

but that's pretty much not what this is about

11-01-2016 , 03:08 PM

#42418

aflametotheground

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,851

Could she be impeached? Not according to historical precedent, no.

Presidents can only be impeached for actions committed during their presidency. Alleged crimes committed before a president takes office were never considered impeachable offences.

Yet some scholars argue that Article II, section 4 of the constitution provides no limitation – and there is nothing to prevent a new and different congress from taking a completely different view.

It would, however, be highly unlikely to go against centuries of tradition.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...e-becomes-pre/

11-01-2016 , 03:08 PM

#42419

WichitaDM

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 14,761

Pretty insane that just about the only thing everyone is talking about is EMAILZ still. I really thought this would blow over by November 8th but am having my doubts now.

11-01-2016 , 03:12 PM

#42420

master3004

Revisionist Historian

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 56,420

Quote:

Originally Posted by WichitaDM

Pretty insane that just about the only thing everyone is talking about is EMAILZ still. I really thought this would blow over by November 8th but am having my doubts now.

Yeah the fact that there are like 0 stories about Trump stiffing his political pollster almost a million bucks is depressing. We have a guy who is a proven and admitted fraudster close to the presidency.

I would get years in jail for stealing 2K from a bank. Trump has openly stolen millions of dollars over his life and gets jack ****

11-01-2016 , 03:12 PM

#42421

aoFrantic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 25,221

Quote:

Originally Posted by WichitaDM

Pretty insane that just about the only thing everyone is talking about is EMAILZ still. I really thought this would blow over by November 8th but am having my doubts now.

It's because most people don't understand it and it's mysterious. Emails?! Could be anything! Vince foster!

This, when everyone knows it's going to be super boring just like last time and all the wikileaks times.

11-01-2016 , 03:13 PM

#42422

DeuceKicker

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 5,359

Quote:

Originally Posted by aflametotheground

It would, however, be highly unlikely to go against centuries of tradition.

I wouldn't bet against it on these grounds. This aint your grandparents' GOP

11-01-2016 , 03:15 PM

#42423

GBP04

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 7,941

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13ball

I mean she repeatedly testified that she turned over all of her work related emails. yes of course things would be an absolute slam dunk if they could prove obstruction. But if they can't prove blatant intent you don't just automatically get off. You don't think it's very bad for Hillary if it turns out that she had work related emails that she did not turn over??? she didn't even qualify her testimony.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...e-on-benghazi/

Quote:

GOWDY: Well, our jurisdiction hasn't grown, Madam Secretary. Our jurisdiction is the same thing it was.

Let me ask you this. You say that you turned over everything. I don't get a chance to watch you a lot on television, but when I see you are interviewed, you make a point of saying, I turned over everything.

CLINTON: All my work related emails, yes.

GOWDY: How do you know that?

CLINTON: I know that because there was an exhaustive search done under the supervision of my attorneys, and that is exactly the outcome. We turned over every work related email, in fact, as somebody referred to earlier, we turned over too many.

11-01-2016 , 03:16 PM

#42424

RV Life

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 1,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeuceKicker

I wouldn't bet against it on these grounds. This aint your grandparents' GOP

Yea I mean they are already shifting the Supreme Court decision from "Let's wait to the election!" to "If Clinton is elected, we will wait 4 years!"

They'd impeach her on getting a speeding ticket in 1972 if they could.

11-01-2016 , 03:16 PM

#42425

WichitaDM

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 14,761

If two years ago or whenever this mess started Hillary would have just said "look I messed up, got bad advice, etc. and transmitted classified emails over my private server" and turned everything over immediately this would all be long since over by now. That is the insane part to me. The cover-up or at least the appearance of the cover up is drastically worse optics than just admitting the mistake in the beginning. It is frustrating because it is costing her some equity.

Page 1697 of 1918

First

697 1197 1497 1597 1647 1677 1687 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1707 1717 1747 1797 1897

Last

...

Page 1697 of 1918

First

697 1197 1497 1597 1647 1677 1687 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1707 1717 1747 1797 1897

Last