Hand please?

Its not a hand I actually played, but I seen it posted on a UK forum and I was perplexed by some of the answers given. I thought post it on 2+2 and see what the consensus is.

The question the hero wanted asked is What would you do and why?

Full Tilt Poker Game #15953922188: Table Glenmore (ante, deep) - $0.50/$1 Ante $0.20 - No Limit Hold'em - 16:48:31 ET - 2009/11/11
Seat 1: Jerry Spinks ($362)
Seat 2: DaStarr ($108.50)
Seat 3: Damn Ringer ($211.55)
Seat 4: Waverbridge ($201.85)
Seat 5: HoldThsNutz ($140.05)
Seat 6: RobTheRaker ($138.80)
Seat 7: ryanhop ($134.40)
Seat 8: Foinavon ($165.55)
Seat 9: Darryl Dazzler ($109.45)
RobTheRaker antes $0.20
Foinavon antes $0.20
Damn Ringer antes $0.20
Waverbridge antes $0.20
Jerry Spinks antes $0.20
HoldThsNutz antes $0.20
DaStarr antes $0.20
Darryl Dazzler antes $0.20
ryanhop antes $0.20
RobTheRaker posts the small blind of $0.50
ryanhop posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #5
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Waverbridge Qh Qc
Foinavon folds
Darryl Dazzler folds
Jerry Spinks raises to $4
DaStarr folds
Damn Ringer folds
Waverbridge raises to $14
HoldThsNutz folds
RobTheRaker folds
ryanhop folds
Jerry Spinks calls $10
*** FLOP ***

Qd Td 6c

Jerry Spinks checks
Waverbridge has 15 seconds left to act ???

bet around $15-20

You always leading top set?

We betting for value or because we're scared of the draws?

what answer is there besides bet, this is a stupid hand. 200 bbs deep, only $30 in the pot, board is drawy, we are in position. this isnt "leading" top set, and it is obviously a bet for both value AND to protect against draws

Time of the month?

aversion to idiocy