Quote:
Originally Posted by carrotsnake
haha, I'm always in such great moods at 9 am in the morning! Anyway, for those hands craig.
Hand 1- I can actually see the check there, but (simplistically), when we bet we're being called by any ace, some K's(I would assume KQ calls here depending on the player, not saying its right, but if you assume some K's call at least say that one does). Assuming you make a fairly decent size value bet(almost full pot works here since even though you discount most Kx then, alllll Ax call). So the value of a bet here vs his range thats doing anything is basically pot. The thing is, you want the value to be greater or be getting value from a greater range if you check, I'm not so sure he's ever bluffing here(its like just a terribad board for it, since your probably checking some Ax thats never folding etc etc.) but you can probably say the amount he checks is equal to the amount of Kx folds you get if you bet(missing value from both). If he bets with Ax and you c/r, he's probably folding unless you have some pyscho image, you do gain more value from exactly AK, and maybe more from some other Ax hands, but he's also betting less then full pot for sure with most any Ax hand(to try and get crying calls from Kx). This one is certainly close cuz it has the most metagame etc. behind it, but the fact is that if I wanna set up metagame I want it to be aggresive, not don't vbet light vs me. that might be a personal thing though. You obv have to check hands this big sometimes or else I guess he could steamroll you, though I doubt that happens
The other two are way more simplistic imo.The second one I actually don't get the raise oop aginst a guy limping the button. Its a realllly weak hand and apparently you don't know how he plays if your asking how this should go down. You should know if he's a spazzy bluffer or passive bitch. Considering he limped the button, your missing tons f value here from Ax that checks behind as well as probalby Kx and god knows what else. People who limp the button are just by definition passive until they show otherwise and trying to play tricky vs them is silly.
Hand 3, I dunno man. The leads are obviously fine, but what exactly is he gonna be bluffing here after you show that much strength? Again, probably read based if your gonna do this. The only good thing about checking is you def stack Kx vs maayyyybe just a call if he has Kx and you bet. but if he has Ah, he's 100% checking behind river imo, and what other hearts do you think he has that are unpaired? And any other pair is definitely snap calling a river bet, but checking behind again. So its like, is the value of pairs + maybe lone Ah snapping you off > chance of Kx not stacking off. pretty sure it is. Without other reads you've given us you just have to base your values off assumptions like that. I'd bet pretty close to pot fwiw
Either way, the value of 1 and 3 is def debatable and you can actually stox or whatever you want it out. Its going to depend on assumptions you make about their calling/bluffing ranges in both cases.But based on just std play pretty sure checking is gonna be worse in both cases. Plus checking is pussy!
Great post, thank you very much. I like your thoughts a lot on hand 2 (K8 raise def is not std for me, so I probably just lost a pot to him). I wish I had more reads for hands 1 and 3 but I just marked the hands in HEM when they happened and I just happened to go back and look at them from the past couple of weeks so I forget everything I was thinking at the time (be a cool HEM feature if you could make a note and mark the hand at the same time imo). Everything else you said obviously makes a ton of sense.
So yah back to the drawing board, finding good spots to c/r for value isn't as easy as it seems...
Last edited by craiggerz; 02-03-2010 at 11:43 PM.