Rush poker. Villain is unkown 25/11/0.67 over 88 hands.
Full Tilt Poker $1/$2 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
The Official
2+2 Hand Converter
Powered By DeucesCracked.com
Hero (MP): $80.00
CO: $200.00
BTN: $532.60
SB: $339.55
BB: $214.15
UTG: $142.70
Pre Flop: ($3.00) Hero is MP with K
A
1 fold,
Hero raises to $7,
3 folds, BB calls $5
Flop: ($15.00) 2
6
3
(2 players)
BB checks,
Hero bets $10, BB calls $10
Turn: ($35.00) 5
(2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks
River: ($35.00) 4
(2 players)
BB checks,
Hero bets $63 all in
Tried to win the whole pot instead of splitting. He could have made the flush, but I thought there was little change he was better than the board. I think the stack size was perfect for this, as it puts great pressure on him to call hoping for a split, and doesn't allow him to try a re-bluff.
Since he called a flop C-bet with two clubs, I give him a better then random chance of having two clubs, but worse than random chance of having a 7. Let's say these two cancel out (maybe I'm being optimistic, but it simplifies a lot). So his chance of having 2 clubs is 9/52 * 8/51, and a 7 is 4/52, for a total chance of him beating the board of roughly 10%.
So 10% of the time I'd lose $63, and 90% of the time I'd win $17,5 (assuming he doesn't call if he's with the board), for an EV of +$9.45 above checking.
Is my logic correct? Do you agree?
PS: Before anyone throws the first stone, I play middle-stacked intentionally to avoid SPR issues with TPTK type hands.
Last edited by petrucio; 09-05-2010 at 04:33 AM.
Reason: erasing results