NL200, value bet OTR? - Small Stakes Pot Limit and No Limit

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Strategy Small Stakes PL/NL

NL200, value bet OTR?

...

03-20-2014 , 09:51 AM

SDro

centurion

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 104

Villain is 26/21, wtsd 31%, wwsf 53, w@sd 48%, fold to cb: 41, 13, 75 over 1.4k sample. Pretty stabby on the flop, little less on the turn, no data on river.
My image is pretty agro but nothing too out of line.
Your line?
$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
5 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
drop (UTG) ($200) 100bb
CO ($207.05) 104bb
BTN ($206) 103bb
SB ($484.70) 242bb
BB ($257.05) 129bb

Pre-Flop: ($3, 5 players) drop is UTG K

drop raises to $6, CO calls $6, BTN calls $6, 2 folds

Flop: 6

($21, 3 players)
drop bets $15.75, CO calls $15.75, BTN folds

Turn: Q

($52.50, 2 players)
drop bets $33, CO calls $33

River: 5

($118.50, 2 players)

Final Pot: $118.50

03-20-2014 , 10:29 AM

Mr Blonde

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 3,751

I'm fine with anything that isn't betting 50bbs-all in

03-20-2014 , 04:00 PM

Jeikeiem

journeyman

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 249

I think KQ with a diamond is the worst hand I would consider cbeting on the flop with. Probably just x/folding myself. As played I either bet 45-60$ or x/c the river.

03-20-2014 , 06:30 PM

the real mg0698

old hand

Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 1,828

I think river is a pretty standard bet, I'd size it on the bigger side.

03-21-2014 , 03:03 PM

ckrumm24

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 225

Quote:

Originally Posted by the real mg0698

I think river is a pretty standard bet, I'd size it on the bigger side.

Bet, I only say this because tere are very few hands that he would actually shove river with and also very few hands he bets rivers with that aren't bluffs. So I guess you could bluff catch too , it's 50/50. I would like to hear a good arguement for one option over the other.

03-21-2014 , 05:20 PM

pilliapina

grinder

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 491

Definitely valuebet, you are probably cbetting the flop with your AdJx and AdKx and KJs so you should still get to the river with plenty of air given you barrel those OTT a bunch.

03-24-2014 , 09:18 AM

SDro

centurion

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 104

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckrumm24

Yeah I think I like bluff catching more. Not really a lot of hands that will call river with us firing three barells from UTG .

03-25-2014 , 10:43 AM

pokersin13

stranger

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 3

check/f flop

03-25-2014 , 12:45 PM

aaronray

enthusiast

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 94

You c-bet the turn pretty big, Villain could've called both barrels w/ 10x or any flush draw. Seeing how you bet pretty big up to this point. I think 3 barreling is a good option since Villain can think your bluffing since it looks like you represented top pair on 2 straight streets (assuming Villain knows you never do this with any overpair). I also like check-calling here, it allows Villain to fire off a bluff with missed draws and on some occasions with complete air. I def like a 3 barrel-shove in this spot more than I do either check-calling or value betting.

03-25-2014 , 01:35 PM

#10

Ionatan

newbie

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeikeiem

I think KQ with a diamond is the worst hand I would consider cbeting on the flop with. Probably just x/folding myself. As played I either bet 45-60$ or x/c the river.

Do you prefer cbting Kq with no diamonds than qdKx?Isnt better to block fldraws that will raise and float us off the hand?

03-25-2014 , 02:54 PM

#11

SDro

centurion

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 104

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ionatan

Do you prefer cbting Kq with no diamonds than qdKx?Isnt better to block fldraws that will raise and float us off the hand?

...