Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NL100: TT on 9xx9x board NL100: TT on 9xx9x board

01-12-2010 , 04:56 PM
Here is a spot I think I'm losing money on.

villain is a plain and cold fish, running at 54/11 over a short sample of 35h. Based on his nick he is likely from Sweden, if someone wants to take something out of this.


Poker Stars $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em - 5 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

BB: $101.35
UTG: $101.00
CO: $87.35
Hero (BTN): $108.05
SB: $100.00

Pre Flop: ($1.50) Hero is BTN with T T
1 fold, CO calls $1, Hero raises to $4.50, 2 folds, CO calls $3.50

Flop: ($10.50) 6 9 2 (2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $9, CO calls $9

Turn: ($28.50) 9 (2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $20, CO calls $20

River: ($68.50) 8 (2 players)
CO bets $17, Hero calls $17



I doubt I can fold here because of the odds, but I rarely see him bluffing in this spot (assuming he is not only hitting buttons but thinking in a twisted kind of way, whatever).

Would the situation be any different, if the river is a 3h?
01-12-2010 , 05:11 PM
you need 21% to BE and I doubt you are always smoked here

what range do you betting on the turn against?
01-12-2010 , 05:16 PM
don't mean to be a nit but you only need to be good about 17% here.
01-12-2010 , 05:20 PM
i think shoving > calling >>>>>>> folding mainly because of his river betsizing. I just dont see him betting $17 into $68 with a 9 or T7 when he has only $54 behind. He way more often has a bluff (like KQss) or a weak made hand (like 65 or 78 or AJ or 55) IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parvex
Would the situation be any different, if the river is a 3h?
a shove becomes less appealing because more draws missed and less pairs are possible.



it would be an interesting spot if villain jammed river.
01-12-2010 , 05:20 PM
Snap he can have 87 6A who knows.
01-12-2010 , 05:25 PM
shoving the river sucks. Just because you are ahead of the majority of his river bet range when he bets that amount doesn't mean shove for value is good.
01-12-2010 , 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by monarco
i think shoving > calling >>>>>>> folding mainly because of his river betsizing. I just dont see him betting $17 into $68 with a 9 or T7 when he has only $54 behind. He way more often has a bluff (like KQss) or a weak made hand (like 65 or 78 or AJ or 55) IMO.



a shove becomes less appealing because more draws missed and less pairs are possible.



it would be an interesting spot if villain jammed river.
you are saying a donk whos betting that river smallish is folding to a shove and that play is more EV than just calling with an overpair here?

I am a little bit sceptic sir
01-12-2010 , 05:30 PM
i want to shove for value. hes a fish, he can definitely call with worse hands thinking that he induced this with his betsizing or that he has a pair and the fd bricked or whatever.
also as i said i think he has very few better hands with that betsizing.
01-12-2010 , 09:00 PM
This is probably a bad example as the bet size in fact leaves us little room room to fold. How about him betting in the 25-35 area? What, if he shoves?

In regards against what range I'm betting on the turn: For value against all kinds of straight draws/gutshots, overcards/pairs which picked up a flush draw and all other hands he at times does not want to get rid of (read: A-high and overcards).
01-12-2010 , 09:08 PM
Call, he can have a lot of missed oesd and gutters, second and bottom pair type hands that he is trying to avoid having to face a river bet with, or some fish logic or other

If he checked you can probably shove for value

      
m