HAND 1

Villain is 66/14/2 over 80 hands.
Iso'er is 34/26/3.

No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Hero (BB) ($105.40)
UTG ($39.20)
MP ($173.45)
CO ($117)
Button ($43.80)
SB ($106.20)

Preflop: Hero is BB with A, Q
UTG calls $1, MP bets $5, 3 folds, Hero calls $4, UTG raises $38.20 (All-In), 1 fold, Hero?

HAND 2

Villain is 18/15/2 over 800 hands. 23% steal.
48% fold to cbet.
69% flop cbet, 79% turn cbet.

No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Button ($100)
SB ($112.85)
Hero (BB) ($100)
UTG ($65.07)
MP ($104.55)
CO ($178.85)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 10, J
3 folds, Button bets $3, 1 fold, Hero calls $2

Flop: ($6.50) J, 3, 3 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $4.87, Hero calls $4.87

Turn: ($16.24) 4 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $12.18, Hero calls $12.18

River: ($40.60) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks

Total pot: $40.60

1 fold "comfortably" it's gay but as you know fish usually just tarp here, even AK I wouldn't be thrilled about calling (although I probably do)..

Hand 2 what is your question? Looks standard

I disagree... Hand 1 looks like a "comfortable" call

Hand 1 I would call if the fish got iso'ed a ton in the preceding hands because he could rage-shove here a lot, but if it's the first time he does something ******ed like that I'd pitch it.
Hand 2 is nothing but std

hand 1 snappity snap

its over dude who cares

h1: i fold.

h2: i'd rather 3bet vs this villain but as played flop, turn and river are standard. i like the turn call vs this villain since he's barreling so much and is probably playing 45 tables without paying very close attention.

why? He doesn't fold a lot, isn't 3 betting JT just value-towning ourselves? I get it if he folds to 3 bets a lot, but I don't see it for value.

EDIT: What I wrote as "fold to cbet" is "fold to 3 bet". My bad, typo. Might change your decision.

yea that is an important change. i had assumed that villain was mostly nitty and likely to snap-fold to our 3bets. obviously our 3bet would not be for value, we'd just be balancing our range with a hand that plays decently.

with such a low fold to 3bet i might be inclined to just fold pre against a nitty villain since we will rarely be able to get much value out of the boards we smash. as i type this i realize how nitty it sounds but i just don't like calling here.

as played i still call flop and turn.

Yeah, I think the important spots here are pre, and turn. I'm not against folding, I've been folding a lot in marginal spots and honestly, if you fold a ton of spots that might make a bb or 2 if you play perfect, but you avoid that one mistake that costs you 30bb, you're doing yourself good.

i don't think i'm folding hand 1 with that guy's stack size

if it was more i can prob find a fold

ez fold h1, even for 40bbs

loose passive limpshoves, what do you think he has


h2 how else did you want to play it

FYP

hand 2 why did u post this? i dont see any street where u can do something diff other than 3b pre