HAND 1
BB is 21/17/2 over 500 hands. 4% 4bet.
36% fold to cbet, 33% turn, 47% WWSF.

BTN 39/26/0 over 70 hands.

No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

MP ($172.65)
Hero (CO) ($214.26)
Button ($35.05)
SB ($47.25)
BB ($110.10)
UTG ($48.50)

Preflop: Hero is CO with 8, 8
2 folds, Hero bets $3, Button calls $3, 1 fold, BB calls $2

Flop: ($9.50) A, 7, 2 (3 players)
BB checks, Hero checks, Button checks

Turn: ($9.50) 3 (3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $6, 1 fold, BB calls $6

River: ($21.50) J (2 players)
BB bets $16.12, Hero?

His line is wack, and I look weak.

HAND 2
Villain is 23/18/6 over 600 hands. 70% fold to 3 bet. Fold to cbet 3/3 in 3 bet, 4/5 over all.
Has once called a 3 bet ip with A6s and flatted a flush on the flop vs me (kind of weird,doesn't match his stats).

He sees me as TAG, 5-6% 3 bet.

No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (5 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Hero (SB) ($133.75)
BB ($146.62)
UTG ($57.08)
MP ($98.85)
Button ($259.80)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 7, 9
2 folds, Button bets $3, Hero raises $10.50, 1 fold, Button calls $8

Flop: ($23) A, Q, K (2 players)
Hero bets $13, Button calls $13

Turn: ($49) J (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks

River: ($49) 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks

Total pot: $49

b/c we're deep I expect him to call a lot of prs, hence the cbet.

HAND 3
CO is 22/14/4 over 300 hands, 30% steal, fold to 3 bet 2/3.
SB is unknown.

No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

BB ($100.50)
UTG ($110.14)
MP ($262.38)
CO ($105.42)
Hero (Button) ($100)
SB ($199.20)

Preflop: Hero is Button with K, 9
1 fold, MP checks, CO bets $3, Hero raises $10, SB calls $9.50, 2 folds, CO calls $7

Flop: ($31) 9, 3, 3 (3 players)
SB checks, CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($31) A (3 players)
SB checks, CO checks, Hero checks

River: ($31) 7 (3 players)
SB checks, CO checks, Hero checks

Total pot: $31

I mean really though, 0 for 97?

h1 why did you give 4bet %? sq % is more relevant
shrug and fold

h2 looks fine unless you want to barrel off turn and river

h3 there are many ways you can play this, cbetting flop and barreling that turn
checking flop and then betting turn as a bluff

First off, thanks for responding. I was concerned 2+2 was officially dead.

Hand 1, that's his 3 bet %, typo. Squeeze % is roughly equivalent.

Hand 3, I agree HU, do you still play it this way 3 way? My thought was their ranges were generally confined to QQ-TT, AQ, maybe AJ. Betting flop essentially meant hoping they both have AQ and get value/force them to fold equity. Once the turn hits, I'm basically hoping they both have QQ-TT, and these might call turn, but betting t/r is thin since they both have AQ/AJ in range at it's very likely one of them isn't folding.

I dunno, thoughts? Too passive?

You need to bet more (often)

1 I bet the flop, as played fold
2 is fine
3 bet turn & riv as bluff

Try picking a hotter chick next time. This bitch is bottom 1.

Interesting, do you think you ever get a fold out of AQ/AJ? I guess I don't think we do, and combined I don't think they have enough hands that aren't these...

h1: bet flop. i don't think i have a checking range on this flop but if you want to be able to check here you should definitely be checking some Ax hands too. as played river is a fold.

h2: fine imo.

h3: i like betting flop and barreling the A turn better.

+1 on this chick being meh, bro.