Quote:
Originally Posted by Ez MonEz
Generally, I agree with you sviridenich about 3betting and whatnot, but I had been doing a lot of it (15% or so) so I did expect him to call me with a fair amount of worse hands although maybe I am overestimating how observant someone like villain is. On the flop I debated between check/bet/bet and bet/check/bet, but ended up deciding on the latter because I thought villain would call with some worse hands and I would rather not give hands a chance to draw out on me that wouldn't have continued otherwise. I also felt that I would get more value out of a jack (although he doesn't really have any in his range other than AJ so this is probably faulty reasoning) with bet/check/bet because check/bet/bet is almost always a relatively weak ace or QQ+ although villain might not be aware of that.
that's check on flop may look like weak ace ( how weak? thus villain may decide that his weaker ace is good here)
it may look like qq,kk ( again weak hand, weaker hand that you actually have, so it is good for you)
once you decide to give up on flop, you'd start with checking a flop.
that's when you check flop, you underrepresent you hand and villain may pay off with worse or fire some desperation bluff.
It seems to that you want to get no less than two streets of value with your non-premium kicker. Don't you consider check/check/bet , check/bet/check lines?