personally I think I played this hand wrong, only moved to the table 2 hands previous so nothing is read dependent.

after c-betting flop 3/4 of pot, can I fold to the raise from villain UTG, especially with someone behind?

Flop wp, never fold this. Pre I would prefer just limping behind. Note that you are in good shape even if one player has the nuts, and other has your FD killed, so it is a total no-brainer ship.

pre I think this is ok spot to limp behind

flop try to get all money in

pre is super interesting, I hate the raise, I hate the limp, and I hate the muck

happy limp with 45 67 75 sidecards,,,, 100 deep wioth huge spr I suppose limping is optimal but you want set+draw, top set nuts is rare with TT,,,, **** loads of straights around a T** flop that gets action or overpairs,,,, pre is super interesting and dodgy spot and don't really know much about TT52ds I tihnk my natural instinct is to just muck it unless I have a BTN open or I can isolate a limper and table is just generally tight,,, I hate limp calling for instance,

flop HEads up is like insta fistpump shove, 3way+ and this is where yousee variance and the weakness of rank/hand rank come into play, but still top set+fd is rarely foldable even 3way,,,, 4way with tags then ughghghghghgh puke... there are some really interesting variations of this hand

Pre - limp behind to set mine multiway and hope for a flush redraw (or two)

is pre always limp/fold here? i think c-betting the flop makes it look like AA/KK/QQ+clubs a majority of the time here too, or am i way off?

initial thoughts were obv. 89xx for UTG, shipping ott of his raise hoping for a fold from the btn - if he doesn't have the NFD he has to fold a lot here

close, since our hand is trash multiway and btn is loose. this is probably offset b/c utg and mp are limping with worse garbage and the blinds may be tight.