Quote:
Originally Posted by coon74
I've done numbers basing on my PLO20 rake stats on Microgaming (only a 10K-hand sample, I've played at so many sites, stakes and currencies that I'm lazy to invoke my whole 50K-hand database) as if rake was collected according to the mentioned structures: 3.5% / 12.5bb cap for Pokerstars PLO€2, 4.15% / 20bb cap for PS PLO5 and 10% / 2.5bb cap for MG PLO€4.
It turned out that MG PLO€4 rake is only 10% higher than PS PLO€2 and 10% lower than PS PLO5 because the PS caps are hit seldom (if the pot is 357+ bb) but the MG cap is hit 28% of the time overall and 59% of those times when I VPIP.
Taking into account that MG offers reloads worth 20% in RB on a regular basis (with an ability to rotate skins) in addition to the 30% VIP and also sometimes easy rake races, I believe it's far better than PS for nanostakes rakewise. Myth busted. I'll post a full report in the Internet Poker rake petition thread after I sleep and grind a bit, and everyone else is also encouraged to do analogous calculations on their bigger samples, preferably nanostake.
Hey...
What kind of traffic do you have on Microgaming in nanostakes PLO2/4?
Im looking to start playing omaha, but i have reading that in nano rakes kill simply your winrate. I have a deal with Microgaming with 30% rakeback and a a deposit bonus to clear.