Hey guys.
I've been working on a bankroll challenge the last 2 months, and I've done pretty well, but as of late, I've taken an awful dive. I've played about 300 hours split into 3 main games types, PLO, NL, and MTT's. I've done well in MTT's and NL, and wasn't doing good or bad in PLO, until recently.
Basically I use 40 buys ins for NL
200 buy ins for MTT's
50 buy ins for PLO.
I started with 30, and I'm currently around 700, but I lost a ton the last 3 days playing PLO25.
Here is my Poker EV for PLO. I don't really know if Sklansky Bucks are something to be trusted or not, and I really need to know, so I can tell if I'm playing the game right, as it is definitely my worst game, but one I think to be the most profitable if played correctly.
Basically what I'm asking here is, how much of an effect does this statistic have on your overall winnings? And If it is player dependant (Something like losing to much money without a showdown) how do I check for leaks in that category?
(Also I've never hosted an image online before so I hope this works!)
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/782...ot10164953.png
So just let me know what you think. Also, is 32K hands a big enough sample size to expect these same results?
Also take note hat the first 15K or so hands were played at .01/.02 PLO when Full Tilt hand their "Biggest Bonus Ever", and I had just gotten approved for 16 tables. I went in never playing more than 8 at once, and jumping from 8 to 16 in a game that I'm not to experienced in turned out to be a bad idea.
Thanks!
-Bo
Last edited by radicalyeah; 10-17-2009 at 12:46 AM.