wow

true... besides... that aint workin, that's the way u do it



money for nothing never mind ev

Sincerely,
Rakeback Pro

98% of the hands and 75% of the losses are at 25/50, rest 50/100

that's insanely hideous. shallow?

yea shallow, that's only full tilt. also 10k below EV on stars on the month.

Im on a similar downswing...pretty depressed tbh.

That is just heinous BkiCe. However, ChicagoJoeys gif is pretty apropros (sp?).

i lol'd.

for suck out genius, and everyone else who likes funny stuff - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpue5lHjEQ0 - funny animated tiger woods apology

lol at people complaining about running below ev on the short bus tables if you want less variance man up and play real poker

how much do you want to bet on this?

you can choose the stakes, up to 10/20. i'll bet that my EV adjusted winrate to standard deviation ratio will be higher than yours over whatever number of hands you want to bet on. i play 20-50bb tables, you play 40bb+ tables.

if you're not interested in the wager then please stop talking out of your ass.

EDIT: if you choose 3/6 or below the bet will be on pre-rake winrates so you cant be ******ed and angle this

im not going to bet on this, but im not convinced your right on this one stinkypete. I think the variance/winrate ratio in both shallow and 100bb PLO is about the same.

i'm tiger woods bitches. SUCK IT.

um ok, im confused. so we are saying that:

your EV winrate variance is less than someone elses EV winrate variance in bbs?

you play with 1/5th the stack. put it in buy ins other wise it is apples to watermelons. you mindswell be saying that you could eat more apples in a sitting than watermelons.

or you can compare SSing 5-10 to fullstacking 1-2 and compare winrates and standard deviations based on $/100h rather than bbs. i would bet that 1-2 has less variance with higher winrates.

and last time i checked you cant spend EV$ so put it in actual winrates.

make these minor adjustments and that would make the comparison oranges to grapefruit (which is still closer than apples to watermelons). then i will believe whatever you show me and consider you amazing.

obviously we're comparing actual variance, not variance of your EV line. the purpose of using the EV as a measure of winrate is because otherwise any bet would be a rungood contest unless it was over 300k+ hands.


i'd be happy to make this bet. how many hands should we do it over and how much do you want to bet? i'll even lay 2 to 1.

i don't see any reason not to use EV instead of winrate (nor should anyone that understands what the EV line is), but if you insist on using winrate we'll have to make this a pretty long term bet

you read anything i wrote other than the parts that were jokes? i think you missed the point. i was basically saying that you need to change it BIs not bbs to make your argument applicable.

i will put my $1 up to your $2. (the stakes weigh in so we dont need an escrow and it is all in comradery anyways.)

this is my SHPLO200 since 2-27 when i stopped 24 tabling PLO200 and there is a grand total of maybe 2k 20-50bb hands in there which i bought into for the max.



in $ = $13.62/100 and $296.52/100. so my number dividing WR by std dev is $0.04593282


FWIW: i know you are a good player and i can see why you enjoy AIEV so much. and i agree when dealing in smaller sample sizes, but as you said "unless it is over 300k hands"...i have played well over 300k hands since 8-1 and 1m on the year by the end of this month so i dont see it as important to my winrates. i either win, or i do not. and i went to best buy trying to spend FPPs and sklansky bucks one day but they politely called the cops and told me to put the big screen down.

booked.




ship the $1.

this is all my hands, but if you want to wait until i reach 300k before you ship thats ok too

very well done. but i feel you should do the math. and i wouldnt mind seeing 300k hands but the dollar will be shipped when im done playing. i forget remind me.

if we were comparing BIs though you see my point that you you have considerably more variance.

it's obviously not surprising that with equal stack sizes ($200) the person playing with $5/$10 blinds is gonna have higher variance than the person playing with $1/$2 blinds. but that's irrelevant, what matters is the winrate to SD ratio. that should in theory also be better with deeper stacks, but when opponents play like ******s with short stacks and slightly less ******ed with big stacks it's not necessarily the case.

beat- lost my entire db of hands after getting my pos comp fixed


also lost 25k yesterday and have a chest infection

everything you just said, it is also hilarious how much softer the short tables are.

You gotta love plo. All hands at 5/10. How can I not tilt in this session ? hehe

running that bad and winning a buyin is running pretty dam good imo