Which category of made hands wins more? - Small Stakes Pot Limit Omaha

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy Omaha

Which category of made hands wins more?

Post Reply Subscribe

...

03-17-2008 , 04:57 PM

alavet

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,318

i've found that my most winnings came from full house (480$) and straights (460$). flushes won only 260$
three of a kind totally sucks in my stats (just 9$ won, lol)
please keep in mind i have only 5k hands in my PTO and playing PLO20

with this post im trying to find my leaks and get some statistics

Quote

03-17-2008 , 05:08 PM

Hattifnatt

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 14,414

after 5k hands you can pretty much ignore everything except vpip and pfr and maybe the aggr factors.

Quote

03-17-2008 , 06:45 PM

ranka

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,500

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hattifnatt

after 5k hands you can pretty much ignore everything except vpip and pfr and maybe the aggr factors.

Sorry for hijacking the thread but on Holdem, there are 500 hands enough to determine VPIP/PFR and AF. But on Omaha, how many hands you need, I mean generally. Is 1000 hands enough to trust VPIP/PFR/AF? Or atleast 5000 hands? I don't have any clue about that...

Quote

03-17-2008 , 06:51 PM

Hattifnatt

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 14,414

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranka

its probably about the same in the two games. but analyzing winrates or winrate-relating stuff like in OP after 5k hands is not worth very much.

Quote

03-17-2008 , 07:30 PM

Poker monkey

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,642

To answer OP's question, I've won about the same with all three, +/- 10%, most with full houses, then flushes, then straights. About one sixth of that with trips, then 2 pair / 1 pair are big losers.

Quote

03-19-2008 , 08:02 AM

theviralmind

grinder

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 440

You should be able to extract more profit with straights than flushes, I would think. Everyone can see the 3-flush on the board.

Quote

03-19-2008 , 09:32 AM

FinnAndrews

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 255

Have been playing 10-15K hands myself and I'm planning to 'analyse' winrates at around 20k. 5k is just to small, it still allows for too much of 'bad' or 'good' sessions, meaning you were on that one great table where they all made millions of mistakes

Quote

03-19-2008 , 09:54 AM

alavet

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,318

in PLO20 there is a tons of players making a dozens mistakes

the sense of this post not about my winrates but mostly about YOUR winrates

Quote

03-19-2008 , 11:06 AM

FinnAndrews

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 255

true

I'm playing 20 & 50 myself, combined with short stacking 100.

Within the 10-15K hands at these limits I'm about 1k up, I should look into this more carefully though, don't have my stats with me at the moment. I guess that especially 50 has been profitable, probably because of the fact that I have identified more fishes there and they have been online more

Quote

03-19-2008 , 11:15 AM

#10

wazz

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 15,031

wait for 100k and even those can be heavily skewed one way or the other by luck

Quote

03-20-2008 , 09:16 PM

#11

theviralmind

grinder

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 440

I think you guys have gotten off-topic. I believe OP question was which type of hand wins the most money in PLO. Sets, straights, flushes, full-house, etc. There was no discussion of win-rates or levels of play.

Quote

Post Reply Subscribe

...