played ~10k hands this month and i am running good.



the gap is about 800ish in bbs

i am quite happy that i don't have much time to play the next days.


god, how i hate poker...

When did I ever imply that I want you to care about what I say? Do you see me preaching to you or asking you to alter your behavior? I was simply airing my suspicions to the other people here. I could not care less what you think of my posts or who you consider to be big shots and nobodies.

I will now attempt to resume pretending you don't exist. It's just that by vocally supporting the recent moderations around here you are directly conflicting with the best interests of this forum and that is hard to ignore. All I care about is that this pointless censorship stops.

Darkcore that graph is pretty sick. What sites and stakes?

You don't want to go there, because.....why?

Now we both agree I don't care what you or others think, why would I *care* about being picked on ? Which if I recall was your *reasoning* about me so *obviously* complaining and *demanding* moderation.

Stuff you write falls down so quickly to simple logic.

noiq, party & stars

plo $25/$50/$100, but ~5k hands @ plo $50

1 - We haven't discussed others up until now, but thanks for sharing?

2 - I never "agreed" to that. I simply stated that I'm not concerned one way or the other.

Because you're a human being and we care what people think about us by nature. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure you're completely used to it by now, but that doesn't mean you're totally immune. You can claim you are as much as you like, but it won't fool anybody.

I'm sorry, do you think you have a special place in my heart or something? The only people whose opinions I care about are those I know personally and who I consider to be intelligent. You fit into neither of those categories.

LOL! WTF are you talking about? Where do you come up with these ideas that I care who you like or whose opinions matter to you? You are nothing more than a pest to me that I do my best to ignore.

Or is this just your act? That would make sense as I've seen you play this line with many others.

You guys are funny

English only at the table please. I don't speak ******ese.

Those are called acronyms. Did you ever make it out of grade school?

Keep side stepping, it's your only hope.

Um, there is nothing to sidestep, you actually straight up, didn't make any sense. You're in your own little world, population: you.

To clarify:
You said 'I asked for Buzz to moderate here' and it was 'obvious'.
I said 'I do not care what you say about me' which we both agreed on.
I said 'therefore I have no reason to ask for Buzz to moderate here' totally negating your original pathetic statement which you insisted was 'obviously true'.

Then you went off on another pointless tangent I have no idea what you were waffling about you made that little sense, but clearly it was nothing to do with the points I was making so I left you to it.

There is no sidestepping involved on my part, only the crippled thoughts in your brain that are warping reality by an order of magnitude.
So long as you continue to entertain me, I will continue to reply, you will know when I am bored of you as I just wont reply any more. I hope you will be able to comprehend that rather than you making some victory speech about me giving up.
Here's hoping your next reply is entertaining, or failing that, so screwed up that I get to call you a ****** several more times.

This content is below low.

And hopefully he will finally agree with me that moderation is a good thing.

yeah, i love these all vs ribbo or vice versa threads. sometimes they create some noise, but hell they are funny...

btw. when do we see some more vids ribbo? i liked the two you did already and there are not enough omaha vids out there.

I accused, you denied, neither of us can provide any proof, so what more can be said?

Again, you're putting words in my mouth. You should try reading people's posts slowly so they might actually sink into your thick skull. I never said I agreed you didn't care. In fact, it's quite obvious from how childish and defensive you're being that you do care a great deal.

And since I never agreed as you like to imagine, my statement was never negated.

You clearly don't have a very strong understanding of the English language. What is your first language anyway?

Your grasp of English is pretty weak.

When Buzz says this:
That means what it says and you should treat it as your 'proof' you so desperately need.
Unless of course you think Buzz is a liar. Are you accusing Buzz of lying?

Once again you see only what you want to see.

If you'll look at the latter part of his statement, he goes on to say that while somebody did contact him about this issue, it's not their fault because he takes full responsibility. I hate to break it to you, but that hardly excludes you.

Anyway, Buzz would obviously not expose you, so his outright denial would be just as meaningless as yours.

Thanks for exposing yourself for what you are.
That's all I wanted to hear, outright denial in the face of the proof you said didn't exist.
You should leave and find another forum if you think the moderator is a liar. Show some class, each of your last 4 posts show you desperately clutching at straws. Reality is starting to sink in with your brain, but your brain doesn't like it.

You're so deluded it's depressing. Here let me recap it for you more simply. This is what your so called proof says:

This isn't Ribbo's fault. Someone contacted me, but it isn't their fault because I am responsible for my own moderations.

Now can you explain to me logically how you think that proves you weren't the one who contacted him?

I thought not. Got any other "arguments" you'd like to embarrass yourself with?

If you're out of ideas, I'll throw you a bone. Since you're so fixated on what Buzz says, you could try to explain to me how the word of somehow who is not permitted to answer a certain way whether truthful or not means anything as far as proof is concerned.

Post deleted by Buzz

Wazz - I'm going to delete your post after I reply. No offense intended. (You didn't do anything more than they did). I'm hoping this will end it. I let them verbally slug it out for a while, just to demonstrate to everybody how useless it is. It might be entertaining, but it really doesn't have much to do with strategy in the game of Omaha.

And it takes at least one of our best posters out of action. He's not responding to other strategy and money considerations when he's dealing with this tripe.

These arguments tend to escalate and then the animosity generated spills over into other threads, with the various individuals involved continuing taking swipes at each other.

So I'm going to cut it off now. Alas this is the low content thread and I don't want to freeze the whole thread, nor do I want to delete the whole thread. I'm simply going to delete all arguments. Alas, that has the effect of incensing some of you.

But if so, then that's the way it's going to be.

Wazz, your post to which I am replying will be deleted but it's really no slap at you, just an attempt to stop this from escalating any more.

Buzz

I'm just bumping this to remind you to answer Buzz.

I suspect that you don't really have a reason and there really was nothing wrong with the other Low Content Threads.

Deep down inside you realize that you are the root of all the current problems on the PLO board. (i.e. me complaining and Ribbo et al.'s meta-arguments about you).

Please explain how I am wrong in my analysis.

Troll, if I wanted to answer, I would answer.

Stop it, Troll.

Stop it Troll.

No. Enough.

Buzz