Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise

05-25-2022 , 02:27 AM
Hi all,

Main V has been seen to 3! as wide as some bad Q-high rundown pre, so could be as wide as a 60% range. This hand loose short stack fish opens co, V 3! $45 btn, tighter thinking SB cold calls $400 eff. (SB just lost a big pot though, so he may be steaming), hero cold calls AdKcJd9c3c in BB $500 eff. Main V covers and loose fish jams for $170, btn flats (so he seems weak as expected), and now tighter but steaming SB jams $400. I suspect SB may have the same idea I did which is that btn is too wide here, and is now trying to isolate. Hero?

Thanks,
DT
AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise Quote
05-25-2022 , 02:35 AM
All-in!

Think we do better just 4! immediately.
AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise Quote
05-25-2022 , 03:13 AM
Thanks! I was half expecting someone to tell me my dangler sucked and I should have folded pre but I am glad I did not drop the ball for once.
AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise Quote
05-26-2022 , 09:22 AM
This hand is breakeven against top 23% of hands 4 way, so just depends how wide people are jamming
AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise Quote
05-26-2022 , 03:32 PM
Fold pre the first time, your dangler sucks.

Spoiler:
AKJ93ds versus presumably loose 3! and call/4! backraise Quote

      
m