Quote:
Originally Posted by spidercrab
Having ****ty opinions are whatever, but going on a multi-post defense of your ****ty opinions and making the conversation about you is what makes you containment-worthy.
Take a lesson from txdome - he dropped a ****ty opinion earlier and just let it sit there like a turd for everyone to look at and comment on.
Wait, so bad posters respond when others take shots at them / their material, while good (less bad?) posters just take it?
So given this, how should we consider the 3 or 5 posters who're continually engaging me about this stuff?
Fill in the blank: They're totally not bad posters because __________ which makes them continually defending their opinions about DIB and perpetually engaging him acceptable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
1. hijack a thread
2 endlessly argue with everyone who posts about stuff nobody gaf about
So nobody GAF, but the thread is all about me and my opinion on this coke/pepsi topic. How does that work? Do you see this as me talking to myself?
Riddle me this, then: If NGAF, why do you and others keep engaging about it? And why do others get a pass for constant responses to me and my posts, but me responding to them makes me this ****ty poster?