Quote:
Originally Posted by heater
I'm not going to put much stock into the results of an online survey of 869 college students when it comes to attempting to determine the motivations of the owners of 70-80 million dogs.
You can refuse to accept anything you want, but 869 isn't a small sample size and if there're well defined trends observed in college aged dog owners it's likely that you'd find it repeated in the general population. Not something to base policy on but you can still find meaning in the results.
Quote:
As far as how to approach it, I think the first step would be to better hold the owners accountable. I really don't know what would be both fair and impactful, but until owners are made to feel responsible for their dog's behavior, not much will change with respect to bad owners and bad pets. I mean, it just blows my mind that somebody can see their dog bite another person unprovoked and not feel that the dog has to be put down.
There should be mandatory insurance for the same reason that car insurance is mandatory, and taxes that cover potential incidental damages to people/property where the dog runs away after, and the victim can't make a claim. If people can prove they've trained it well and are responsible then they get a rebate on their insurance rates and taxes.