I still haven't really got around to reading about the TBabs stuff. It's tricky what with all the thread merges and renames and what not.

Let me guess though: Tbabs offered to donate to the charities of your choices all for doing simple mental tasks and engaging in simple discourse, and everybody in the thread blocked him and pretended like that wasn't happening and/or were so pathologically neurotically averse to realizing they believe some dumb **** that they turned down these offers, that is, offers that would directly help with the **** they cared about that was a direct result of the dumb **** they believed.

Is that how the threads went?

I bet that's how the threads went.

I straight up thought everybody ignored that Saklad post the other day because of how embarrassing it was to even to even call attention to that aspect.

Lol this is the saddest **** I've ever seen.

Ahahaha "hey maybe if we pretend we don't know whether dogs and humans both have legs then the other OOT NPCs out there will still like us" holy mother of God lol.

I’m confident he does understand. He’s not an imbecile. You are.

Nobody wants your scamcoin donations.

put your mom's phone back before she catches you using her stuff again

Over 13.5 years, spanning 56 pages, and almost 5,600 replies. And here we are, as always, still listening to the dumbest person around argue that nobody really knows what a pitbull is.

The signal to noise ratio with this clown is unreal. Can you imagine if he spent a fraction of this time on something positive? Like maybe not simping for a worthless dog that kills children every 2 weeks?

https://kimatv.com/news/local/i-thou...ous-dog-attack

In your wildest dreams would you have guessed that Phresh's link does not lead to a story about a dog killing a child?

Obligatory reminder that I will donate a few little dollars to the charity or gofundme of your choice if you quote this post, explain the argument to Phresh, and get him to answer the question of what a pitbull is.

Remember, ironically, there is not a wrong answer to the question, per se. There can even be multiple answers. A definitive answer is all I'm looking for, or, an answer saying that he is not able to do so even hypothetically.

He can even use KingofFelt's hilarious cop-out definition. That's fine. Although that would fall under the "not able to do so even hypothetically" part.

I hope KingofFelt is doing ok out there, happily munching on his paint chips.

I feel bad because I keep underestimating what needs to be spelled out:

There is a difference between making a law, legally, and "making" a law, scientifically. A person or group can make any law they want, and it will be a law, provided they have the power to uphold that law. That is significantly different than making a scientific claim and then proving that claim.

This is why the Pet Killers will try to seamlessly transition from "'Pit bulls' defy everything we thought we understood about genetics and biology" to "we can just make a dumb law banning them duh problem solved" when they run in to the brick wall of having to argue (or even just state plainly lol) their beliefs.


Here is an analogy that should easily explain the difference between the two things, which nobody of sound and open mind should have a problem with:

Say, you know, hypothetically, you all wanted to enslave black people again, for example. If you had enough power you could do that and there would be nothing I could do to stop you. However, if you thought to argue with me on the internet that black people are scientifically inferior and should be enslaved, you would not have the power to win that argument.

See the difference?

Let's be perfectly clear,

are you saying that the woman whose child was killed by a dog, who set up a gofundme seeking monetary help (and all the similar recipients of potential donations)...

You're saying she is lying?

Nobody's stopping you from donating money. That would be very nice of you.

You have no money to give her.

Agreed, but, similar to the way all these attempted conversations have gone, that wasn't the topic.

What's stopping you?


p.s. and why would that also not be a nice gesture?

I just donated.

Didn't you just say I have DOGEcoins and FTT?

That wasn't the topic either but I'll take the blame for that one.

What's stopping you from having me donate?

Or a better question: what do you think is stopping other people from having me donate?

Saklad and whichever other NPCs aren't watching and if they are, it's been established that there's an unspoken even subconscious agreement to pretend real hard like I'm the "dancing monkey". So you don't have to worry about that. This is a surprisingly intimate thread.

good one

p.s.

Like, look at this pure psychosis below:

You all are fine. You can say whatever you want. Maybe admit that you're actually not horny to murder pets. Everybody will believe regardless that you're totally pwning the dancing monkey and making him dance, or, more importantly, they'll pretend real hard that they believe so. It's a mutually assured destruction-emperor's new clothes situation.

You won't believe it but Jman420 there is going for a "cryptocurrency isn't real money" and not a "you are poor" joke.