Open Side Menu Go to the Top
FAQ Today's Posts Search Twitter Discord
Register
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade?
View Poll Results: Should we call 2010 the start of a new decade?
Yes, because it's silly to carry over
126 73.68%
No, because I'm a nit about technicalities
25 14.62%
*****, you bastitch
20 11.70%
Post Reply Subscribe
...
Page 2 of 2
First
Page 2 of 2
Go to page:
Go
1 2
Last
Go to page:
Go
Page 2 of 2
First
Page 2 of 2
Go to page:
Go
1 2
Last
Go to page:
Go
01-01-2010 , 02:53 PM
#26
CheckCheckFold's Avatar
CheckCheckFold
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By CheckCheckFold Find Threads By CheckCheckFold
old hand
Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 1,577
How is this even ****in question? How is it ever not a new decade?
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 02:56 PM
#27
ATAT's Avatar
ATAT
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By ATAT Find Threads By ATAT
old hand
Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Williams
Do you consider 2000 to be a part of the 1990's?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPoppa
Making 1950 part of the 40's and 1990 part of the 80's is just ridiculous, so the answer is clearly yes.
I'm not arguing that 2010 should be part of the aughts, but there is a comical amount of begging the question going on itt
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 03:28 PM
#28
dkgojackets's Avatar
dkgojackets
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By dkgojackets Find Threads By dkgojackets
DKGOAT
Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 86,120
every year starts a new decade. 2010 starts the decade of 2010-2019.

the "no year 0" nits should jump in a grease fire since those years were arbitrarily labelled centuries after they happened. its not like jesus popped out and joseph flipped his calender to year 1.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 03:29 PM
#29
bobman0330's Avatar
bobman0330
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By bobman0330 Find Threads By bobman0330
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 24,234
People who are claiming that the answer is no because there was no year 0 are not just pedantic nits, but pedantic nits of the worst kind: pedantic nits who are wrong because instead of knowing what they're talking about, they heard about some obscure idea from someone smarter than themselves, and now they just want to brag about it by applying the concept in a place where it obviously does not belong.

We are not asking whether 2010 belongs in the 201st decade since the traditional placement of the birth of Jesus. We are asking whether 2010 belongs in a set of 10 years called the "2010s." Unless you are stupid, the answer is obviously yes.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 03:36 PM
#30
ATAT's Avatar
ATAT
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By ATAT Find Threads By ATAT
old hand
Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,760
Where exactly are these pedantic nits everyone's so steamed about? Certainly not in this thread.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 03:49 PM
#31
Hammerhands's Avatar
Hammerhands
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By Hammerhands Find Threads By Hammerhands
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 5,429
How can 2000 start the decade and not the millennium?
Concede one to the rational.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 03:54 PM
#32
BigPoppa's Avatar
BigPoppa
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By BigPoppa Find Threads By BigPoppa
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 22,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAT
Where exactly are these pedantic nits everyone's so steamed about? Certainly not in this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
When you count ten items, do you start at 0 and end at 9?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JinX11
If you recognize that there was no year 0 and that the calendar went from 1 BC to 1AD, then no.

If you fail to recognize that there was no year 0 and that the calendar went from 1 BC to 1AD, then yes. Incidentally, you should also opt for the grease fire option.
Ummm
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 03:58 PM
#33
ATAT's Avatar
ATAT
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By ATAT Find Threads By ATAT
old hand
Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,760
Fair nuff
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 04:54 PM
#34
[Phill]'s Avatar
[Phill]
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By [Phill] Find Threads By [Phill]
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 52,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerhands
How can 2000 start the decade and not the millennium?
Concede one to the rational.
Ive never heard it didnt.

Quite the opposite in fact.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 04:56 PM
#35
FlyWf's Avatar
FlyWf
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By FlyWf Find Threads By FlyWf
It's the other way
Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 58,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
People who are claiming that the answer is no because there was no year 0 are not just pedantic nits, but pedantic nits of the worst kind: pedantic nits who are wrong because instead of knowing what they're talking about, they heard about some obscure idea from someone smarter than themselves, and now they just want to brag about it by applying the concept in a place where it obviously does not belong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL2MFYZXL6o#t=9m23s


This was a little obscure even for me, but the quoted post is pure crystallized correctness. They just remember how 2000 wasn't part of a new millennium.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 05:13 PM
#36
istewart's Avatar
istewart
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By istewart Find Threads By istewart
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 15,910
These are my everyday balloons.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 09:30 PM
#37
AquaSwing's Avatar
AquaSwing
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By AquaSwing Find Threads By AquaSwing
veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 2,511
Jesus OOT is sucking this decade.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 09:33 PM
#38
diddy!'s Avatar
diddy!
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By diddy! Find Threads By diddy!
Twas diddyeinstein
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 10,825
Where is the 'No, because it's not'.

Poll choices are skewed in favor of your opinion.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 10:12 PM
#39
rebuyboy's Avatar
rebuyboy
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By rebuyboy Find Threads By rebuyboy
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 3,528
decade

/dekkayd/

• noun a period of ten years.

Every single second (or really any new time), a new decade starts.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-01-2010 , 11:37 PM
#40
[Phill]'s Avatar
[Phill]
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By [Phill] Find Threads By [Phill]
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 52,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebuyboy
decade

/dekkayd/

• noun a period of ten years.

Every single second (or really any new time), a new decade starts.
That's not even wrong.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-02-2010 , 01:41 AM
#41
Hammerhands's Avatar
Hammerhands
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By Hammerhands Find Threads By Hammerhands
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 5,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Ive never heard it didnt.

Quite the opposite in fact.
How old were you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-02-2010 , 03:14 AM
#42
JHair's Avatar
JHair
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By JHair Find Threads By JHair
Bagel Man
Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,407
**** thread imo
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-02-2010 , 03:25 AM
#43
.Alex.'s Avatar
.Alex.
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By .Alex. Find Threads By .Alex.
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 5,672
It makes sense that we haven't completed 2010 years until the end of 2010, just like year 3 of college takes place after only 2 full years have passed.

Of course, it's dumb to use that as an argument for how these numbers should be grouped.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-02-2010 , 03:56 AM
#44
UATrewqaz's Avatar
UATrewqaz
View Profile Find Posts By UATrewqaz Find Threads By UATrewqaz
banned
Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 9,699
All dates are completely arbitrary anyway and lumping 10-19 together as a decade is way more consistent with how we've been labeling decades than any other way, so ya that's it.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-02-2010 , 12:20 PM
#45
SixT4's Avatar
SixT4
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By SixT4 Find Threads By SixT4
veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,924
I hope when Skynet becomes operational (should be soon since 2010 is the future after all) they send a terminator back to rape whoever decided there'd be no year 0.
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
01-02-2010 , 04:55 PM
#46
Harpagon
View Profile Send Message Find Posts By Harpagon Find Threads By Harpagon
newbie
Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 25
2010 starts a new decade but not the 201st decade (2011 starts it); just like the year 2000 starts a new millennium, but not the third one.

We can talk about the ninety's and refer to the period from 1990 to 1999; it is a decade so we can call it that, it's not the 199th decade though.

Language is ambiguous and op just discovered it. Yay!
Should 2010 be considered part of a new decade? Quote
Page 2 of 2
First
Page 2 of 2
Go to page:
Go
1 2
Last
Go to page:
Go
Post Reply Subscribe
...
Page 2 of 2
First
Page 2 of 2
Go to page:
Go
1 2
Last
Go to page:
Go
      
Feedback is used for internal purposes. LEARN MORE
Contact Us Privacy Statement TOS
Top
Powered by:  Hand2Note
Copyright ©2008-2022, Hand2Note Interactive LTD
m