Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! "Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode!

03-05-2012 , 05:46 AM
lol, and lol.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-06-2012 , 06:27 AM
To bring this thread back to something from the OP title, I'm reminded of this amazing exchange between Alan Alda and Paul Rudd from "Wanderlust."

"Just remember -- money buys nothing."
"Well... it kind of..."
"No, I mean literally, money buys NOTHING."
"I think you mean metaphorically."
"No. Literally: money buys NOTHING."
"Literally, money buys MOST things!"
"I'm saying literally it buys nothing!"
"Okay. Okay. You're right. Money does not pay for things."

Such a ****ing hilarious movie.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 10:17 AM
This bugged me:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46832892.../#.T2yFHdW2YoE

"It's all about saving money, right?" Taule said. "If this place had North Carolina prices, I'd of just waved and passed right by."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 12:20 PM
I am posting passages from a new blog entry that is linked to, and therefore implicitly approved of by, Scientific American!
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...ur-everywhere/

Quote:
Honey is awesome. I’ve found its best consumed when combined with nougat and wrapped in dark chocolate but I digress. Honey also has some pretty amazing properties, its broadly antimicrobial and seemingly able to promote healing. ... I can feel you wondering why bee’s would bleach their own food supply and it turns out that is very simple. ... The hole-punchers then do just that to the bacterial cell’s membrane causing its insides to leak to it’s outsides. ... honey and it’s various components might have more secrets to unveil.
This blogger has no understanding of the apostrophe. There are also comma errors in the piece. (The science is bad as well.) It's been up for a couple of days now, despite commentators mocking it. In response to their criticism, the author of the piece has posted something that sounds like a student's excuse for his sloppy homework.
Quote:
I was working on two posts simultaneously, late at night, after managing an event ...
. He also says he has now (as of yesterday afternoon)
Quote:
plugged many of the holes such that it is readable again.
I can't imagine what it was like before he "plugged" those holes.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by science man
plugged many of the holes such that it is readable again
Playing it safe. Good move.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikechike
Playing it safe. Good move.
lol, excellent catch
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 03:15 PM
Well, it is readable now — cringe inducing, but readable. And it probably was before, too. So he's right.

Pretty low bar to set for oneself, though.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 03:18 PM
A slightly more subtle error from that blog, but one of a sort that I can never encounter without losing focus on the point:
Quote:
While only preliminary, it seems honey ...
He makes a that/which error in the same sentence, but I admit I'm one of the few here who is bothered by those.

Also:
Quote:
About the Author: Programs Co-ordinator at RiAus (RiAus.org.au). Purveyor of disease.
wtf?


Edit: Actually, the whole thing is hilariously bad, not just as an exercise in how not to write but as an example of how not to think about scientific matters. Obviously anyone can call himself a blogger and publish his musing and rambling on the web, but SI's putting its imprimatur on this tripe is an embarrassment.

Last edited by atakdog; 03-23-2012 at 03:40 PM.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 03:21 PM
You'll hate this one.

Quote:
Having said this, Bee Defensin 1 and other identified AMPs in honey such as Apidaecin may have much more involved roles that are only recently being uncovered.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 03:39 PM
Lol. Yes, yes I do.

Last edited by atakdog; 03-23-2012 at 03:40 PM. Reason: I wonder why Bee Defensin 1 said that.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
edited by atakdog; Today at 03:40 PM. Reason: I wonder why Bee Defensin 1 said that.
I guess he wanted to go along with the "other identified AMPs."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
Actually, the whole thing is hilariously bad, not just as an exercise in how not to write but as an example of how not to think about scientific matters. Obviously anyone can call himself a blogger and publish his musing and rambling on the web, but SI's putting its imprimatur on this tripe is an embarrassment.
A scientifically-informed individual in the comments points out some of his basic errors in science. Most strikingly, the author of the blog doesn't know the difference between an "agonist" and an "antagonist".
Quote:
Quote:
“lipopolysaccharide (a potent immune system antagonist found on the surface of many bacterial cells)”
Since lipopolysaccharide (LPS, aka endotoxin) stimulates an immune response (inflammation) it is an immune system agonist. An antagonist would suppress a response. A bacteriology PhD student should know this.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 08:10 PM
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...postcount=2089

Quote:
we dont want to take anyting for granite
this one amused me.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-23-2012 , 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by private joker
To bring this thread back to something from the OP title, I'm reminded of this amazing exchange between Alan Alda and Paul Rudd from "Wanderlust."

"Just remember -- money buys nothing."
"Well... it kind of..."
"No, I mean literally, money buys NOTHING."
"I think you mean metaphorically."
"No. Literally: money buys NOTHING."
"Literally, money buys MOST things!"
"I'm saying literally it buys nothing!"
"Okay. Okay. You're right. Money does not pay for things."

Such a ****ing hilarious movie.
Maybe that's where D Cross got his inspiration for this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ly1UTgiBXM
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-25-2012 , 09:59 PM
Recently it seems I keep hearing people say that one thing is "different to" another.

Am I imagining things, or seeing a statistical aberration, or is there a trend toward this construction? Also, do y'all agree that it sounds strange, or is it perhaps a regionally-acceptable idiom?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 12:36 AM
Never heard it before. And it's not correct.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 12:42 AM
I've definitely been seeing/hearing it. I was reminded of it because yesterday it was in an interview with the director of some movie, one they were showing as part of those pre-trailer ads that are now commonplace in movie theaters. It struck me that this was in an edited and packaged piece, not someone stumbling while ad libbing and conflating "different from" and "similar to". The editors chose to leave it in, and that suggested to me some degree of acceptance. And that, in turn, bugged me.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 02:11 AM
Grammar and context are frequently butchered, in those types of pieces, by Editors and Producers. I work on that kind of stuff, and it drives me nuts.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 08:55 AM
Never heard anyone say "different to".
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 09:46 AM
from a cover letter. you make the call:

"I have exceeded every one of my employer's expectations."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 09:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by econophile
from a cover letter. you make the call:

"I have exceeded every one of my employer's expectations."
The phrase "every one of" almost certainly modifies employer[s] rather than expectations, so the apostrophe is misplaced. The ambiguity means the sentence isn't well constructed.

The context might tell us if he is talking about one "employer" but since this is a cover letter, multiple employers seems very likely.

Last edited by NewOldGuy; 03-26-2012 at 10:00 AM.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-26-2012 , 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewOldGuy
Never heard anyone say "different to".
It's a U.K. thing. More in speech than in writing.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-27-2012 , 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagdonk
It's a U.K. thing. More in speech than in writing.
Aha!

Considered an error, a normal idiom, or somewhere in between?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-27-2012 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
Aha!

Considered an error, a normal idiom, or somewhere in between?
you're moms and idiom
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
03-27-2012 , 01:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
Aha!

Considered an error, a normal idiom, or somewhere in between?
Very strict grammarians continue to rule that the only preposition that can follow "different" is "from". My sense is that that rule is more adhered to in the UK than in the US -- which is interesting given the argument that "different to" is a Britishism, not being heard in the US.

Perhaps a recent development?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote

      
m