Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Here's a newsflash. If the world is in a huge amount of trouble from carbon dioxide (something I'm not going to argue for or against here) then a carbon tax won't do **** since its already too late to reverse any problems caused by carbon dioxide.
I don't remember the exact #s. But if the world were to somehow cut carbon emissions back to 1980 levels, in 50-100 years the atmosphere would get back to reasonable, sustainable levels. Or something like that, maybe someone can back me up.
Quote:
In which case the inventions more useful than "the carbon tax" will be something that scrubs the atmosphere or something that protects all of the people living in coastal areas.
I agree mitigation is the much more realistic strategy at this point. But I don't think it means we should give up on trying to solve the root of the problem. I mean doing something vs. nothing could conceivably be the difference between a warmer world and a runaway feedback loop where we wind up like venus in a few hundred years.