Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses

03-29-2013 , 03:39 PM
Really though I was ready to go to war over the what the word "sieze" means in the original Hebrew, whether fifty shekels implies the woman is property, referencing other verses where rape is condoned, etc. his move was pretty expert.

I spent ten years studying theology and apologetics, so i'm a huge pain in the ass.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
Really though I was ready to go to war over the what the word "sieze" means in the original Hebrew, whether fifty shekels implies the woman is property, referencing other verses where rape is condoned, etc. his move was pretty expert.

I spent ten years studying theology and apologetics, so i'm a huge pain in the ass.
how does it condone rape? marriage is HIS punishment (albeit a minor one) for "ruining" her. if he didn't marry her, no one would. for a single woman at that time, it was a lose/lose situation.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 04:33 PM
Forcing a rape victim to marry her attacker is clearly win win. Gg god, if only you ruled this corrupt nation nowadays those sluts getting raped would have nothing to fear.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 04:34 PM
You're such a brave facebook warrior jmakin.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 04:44 PM
And you're such a brave Christian warrior, Fingers! How dare nonbelievers read your book. The nerve.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
I spent ten years studying theology and apologetics
sick beat
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
And you're such a brave Christian warrior, Fingers! How dare nonbelievers read your book. The nerve.
I just question why he doesn't reply to the FB post with a direct criticism (such as: "that's just your religious beliefs, and they shouldn't dictate public, federal policy") and instead must pull an out-of-context OT verse (which anyone who has studied theology, atheist or theist, knows is intellectually dishonest) to assault it.

I have no interest in derailing this thread to a discussion meant for RGT, but I'll reply in a one-shot post. I simply feel obligated to display why it is an out-of-context, random attack. I'll put it in spoilers. I'm more than willing to continue the discussion over PMs with anyone who so desires!

Spoiler:
1) It is arguable* that the original translation improperly implies "rape." See: http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/ot_and_rape.htm, http://aliveinfaith7.blogspot.com/20...marry-her.html, http://www.onyxbits.de/content/athei...tupid-argument

*I, personally, have not studied this particular language close enough to vouch for the above sources.

2) As someone else already stated, a woman who lost her virginity was going to be considered highly undesirable in this time period and unable to find a husband, regardless of the circumstances.

See:
Quote:
First, the Mosaic Law is hardly about letting a rapist off easy. The consequence for raping a woman engaged to be married was stoning (Deuteronomy 22:25). If the woman was not engaged, the rapist was spared for the sake of the woman’s security. Having lost her virginity, she would have been deemed undesirable for marriage—and in the culture of the day, a woman without a father or husband to provide for her would be subject to a life of abject poverty, destitution, and social ostracism. As such, the rapist was compelled to provide for the rape victim for as long as he lived. Thus, far from barbaric, the law was a cultural means of protection and provision.
http://www.equip.org/bible_answers/h...ry-her-rapist/

3) It is unfair to read the passage as an affirmative duty on the woman to marry the man.

See:
Gill's
Quote:
Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, For the abuse of his daughter; and besides this was obliged to give her her dowry also, as Philo (d) says, which is commonly said to be fifty more:
and she shall be his wife; if her father and she agreed to it; and in such a case the man was not at his liberty to refuse

Last edited by Karak; 03-29-2013 at 05:57 PM.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 05:33 PM
GTFO
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:05 PM
But the part about no gays, that part was translated perfectly. What a ****ing coincidence.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:14 PM
Haha. Just got a PM. I won't discuss this in PMs. The bible is a work of fiction. Refute.

Last edited by KenoVictoryLap; 03-29-2013 at 06:22 PM.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:21 PM
lol, Karak is Christian?

Last edited by Das Boot; 03-29-2013 at 06:22 PM. Reason: lol Karak
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karak
I just question why he doesn't reply to the FB post with a direct criticism (such as: "that's just your religious beliefs, and they shouldn't dictate public, federal policy") and instead must pull an out-of-context OT verse (which anyone who has studied theology, atheist or theist, knows is intellectually dishonest) to assault it.

I have no interest in derailing this thread to a discussion meant for RGT, but I'll reply in a one-shot post. I simply feel obligated to display why it is an out-of-context, random attack. I'll put it in spoilers. I'm more than willing to continue the discussion over PMs with anyone who so desires!

Spoiler:
1) It is arguable* that the original translation improperly implies "rape." See: http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/ot_and_rape.htm, http://aliveinfaith7.blogspot.com/20...marry-her.html, http://www.onyxbits.de/content/athei...tupid-argument

*I, personally, have not studied this particular language close enough to vouch for the above sources.

2) As someone else already stated, a woman who lost her virginity was going to be considered highly undesirable in this time period and unable to find a husband, regardless of the circumstances.

See:
http://www.equip.org/bible_answers/h...ry-her-rapist/

3) It is unfair to read the passage as an affirmative duty on the woman to marry the man.

See:
Gill's
definitely takes the cake for most idiotic post. well done. what moron is this on your FB?
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:30 PM
That post is a great example of why the pastor didn't reply. Much better to just pretend these insane verses don't exist than twist yourself into knots trying to defend them--it just draws more attention to the heinous nature of the religious text.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:30 PM
Karak, I find when trying to show bigoted religious people how ridiculous their beliefs are, it helps to use their own holy book.

If you find a troublesome passage, it's "out of context." Don't worry though, there's other verses where women are treated pretty horribly.

Out of numbers 31:

16*Look, these*"women"*caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the*Lord*in the incident of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the*Lord.*17*Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately.*18*But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.

Now i'm SURE all those girls were violated consensually, and it was the best situation for a single girl in those days who found their entire family murdered.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:36 PM
whole lotta butthurt going on itt
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 06:38 PM
Jmakin is correct. The best way to mock religious people publicly (something we ALL need to be doing, for the sake of the future of our society) and shame them into reading their own text is by posting the text of their own holy book where everybody can see it and make their own conclusions. I like to post bible verses with zero commentary and let people draw their own conclusions. The best is when somebody tries to defend one, but that seems to be happening more and more rarely these days.

Here are some great copy/paste verses for the overlazy.

“And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the sabbath day. And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation. And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him. And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp. And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the LORD commanded Moses.”
Numbers 15:32-35

"And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them."
2 Kings 2:23-24

"Slaves, in reverent fear of God submit yourselves to your masters, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh."
1 Peter 2:18

"Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says."
1 Corinthians 14:34
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
Forcing a rape victim to marry her attacker is clearly win win. Gg god, if only you ruled this corrupt nation nowadays those sluts getting raped would have nothing to fear.
What's ****ed up is that Pakistan and several other countries actually live by versions of these rules.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Das Boot
lol, Karak is Christian?
lol, this.

Last edited by minnesotasam; 03-29-2013 at 07:09 PM. Reason: lol Karak
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
That post is a great example of why the pastor didn't reply. Much better to just pretend these insane verses don't exist than twist yourself into knots trying to defend them--it just draws more attention to the heinous nature of the religious text.
We use the context and original translation of all kinds of literature, secular or religious, in order to find their true and accurate meaning. We wouldn't pull 2 sentences out of Plato's Republic and purport to understand them without the rest of the work and knowledge of the time he lived in.

As I said, I won't derail the thread, but I'll try to PM anyone who has a retort or commentary by the end of the weekend. I actually rather enjoy OT discussions. This just isn't the place for it.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:18 PM
He's just trying to recruit you to his church.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:19 PM
I'm no Coach K.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
"Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says."
1 Corinthians 14:34
not sure what the problem is here. this may not go far enough tbh
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:52 PM
Substitute "TV room" for "church" imo (get too many stares when I want to take advantage of "submission" in church).
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 07:58 PM
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote
03-29-2013 , 08:15 PM
I might be doing this thread wrong, but only because of how differently we use Facebook here. It is add everyone. Then remove people.
idiotic / narcissistic / annoying facebook statuses Quote

      
m