Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Flat Earth Fustercluck: The Merge Flat Earth Fustercluck: The Merge

08-04-2017 , 12:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natamus
Moo, were you able to be taught about hot things through someone teaching via explanation or did you have to touch the hot stove and experience being burned?

Moo,

You missed this one.
08-04-2017 , 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
Observable reality:

Your point? The sun shines fully on the moon sometimes.
08-04-2017 , 07:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
Science:



Observable reality:

Moo,

Look up axial tilt, moon orbit, and plane of the ecliptic. I think you'll find it interesting. There might even be YouTube videos.
08-04-2017 , 08:36 AM
Solid, hearty laughs this morning as their is a nyt fluff piece about the Voyager engineers. Keeping the lie going that they're communicating with a spacecraft 14 billion miles away powered by a 16kb computer and decaying plutonium.
08-04-2017 , 09:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1BigOT
Solid, hearty laughs this morning as their is a nyt fluff piece about the Voyager engineers. Keeping the lie going that they're communicating with a spacecraft 14 billion miles away powered by a 16kb computer and decaying plutonium.


Only flat earthers read news papers
08-04-2017 , 09:16 AM
Wait, moo made a post where he showed science and observable reality in agreement? Science predicts full moons, observable reality shows full moons.
08-04-2017 , 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
Your point? The sun shines fully on the moon sometimes.
When it's on the dark side of the earth. But there is daylight in the pic.

Quote:
Science predicts full moons visible at night, observable reality shows full moons visible at day.
you're welcome
08-04-2017 , 11:20 AM
Moo,

I've given you homework again. Please complete it before you comment further.
08-04-2017 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
When it's on the dark side of the earth. But there is daylight in the pic.
Wait, you think that the "science" image means that "science" would say that during the day you should be able to see crescent moons, and at night you'd never see a crescent moon?

Or

Are you still having trouble understanding why during daytime you can see the moon?

Do you believe that the "science" image you showed also means that one half of the earth is always dark and the other half is always light?
08-04-2017 , 11:36 AM
OR he's just trolling by playing dumb.
08-04-2017 , 02:40 PM
Moon phases are easier to understand on the flat earth model. Way less complicated.

My point is that science says the full moon should only be visible at night time. I've had globers tell me this (not in this thread.. which is MORE PROOF that team globe has NO CONSISTENCY)
08-04-2017 , 02:56 PM
moo,

Team globe has idiots on it too.

Science does not say that the full moon should only be visible at night time.

Idiots say that the full moon should only be visible at night time in the round earth model.

Are you an idiot?

If not, you should be able to understand that a full moon can be visible during the day.

https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-see...ill-in-the-sky

If you need more help.

Or, are you literally sticking to the assertion I asked about in the prior post:

"Wait, you think that the "science" image means that "science" would say that during the day you should be able to see crescent moons, and at night you'd never see a crescent moon?"
08-04-2017 , 05:31 PM
Wtf are you guys fish gaping about? You can see the moon in multiple phases including full during the day all the time.

Becoming one of the worst threads oot ever shot out its dirty who hah
08-04-2017 , 05:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
There is actually an answer for this one (one of the youtube videos posted). It's big mirrors. It's hilarious.
Grunching

It's still not an adequate explanation (I watched it previously). It's an explanation of how the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere could see different constellations, but it still doesn't explain how people in the southern hemisphere see the same constellations when they are facing different direction.
08-04-2017 , 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
Moon phases are easier to understand on the flat earth model. Way less complicated.

My point is that science says the full moon should only be visible at night time. I've had globers tell me this (not in this thread.. which is MORE PROOF that team globe has NO CONSISTENCY)
That's not what it says. Again, just because you can't understand basic English does not mean the explanation is wrong. And just because other people are idiots and don't understand science doesn't mean it's wrong.

Hint: The moon does not have to be on the plane that intersects the sun and the earth.
08-04-2017 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
Moon phases are easier to understand on the flat earth model. Way less complicated.
It doesn't make it right

Quote:
My point is that science says the full moon should only be visible at night time.
No it doesn't

Quote:
I've had globers tell me this (not in this thread.. which is MORE PROOF that team globe has NO CONSISTENCY people are stupid)
08-04-2017 , 06:06 PM
Poor moo, standing in a room full of people who know you're an idiot and are giggling at you while you desperately try to convince them you're not the uneducated moron, they are a group of confused and brainwashed sheeple.

Life must be difficult to navigate
08-04-2017 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moo buckets
My point is that science says the full moon should only be visible at night time.
Science doesn't say that, you do. The only way it would be in constant shadow of the earth is if there was a constant eclipse by the earth, which is darn near impossible.
08-04-2017 , 07:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pudley4
Grunching

It's still not an adequate explanation (I watched it previously). It's an explanation of how the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere could see different constellations, but it still doesn't explain how people in the southern hemisphere see the same constellations when they are facing different direction.
I haven't watched the entirety of the youtube video (as lol why would I?), but I thought they were saying the mirrors reflected the same thing on the spinny upside down thing no matter which way they were facing.

Anyway. The model has some possible issues
08-04-2017 , 07:58 PM
OK now let's talk about the other moon pic I posted, where the left side of the crescent is illuminated before the sun rises.

What's the deal with that? I've been told by globers that the rotation of the moon over the course of the day is proof of the globe. I expected the waning crescent to come up like a thumbs down nail, and turn sideways throughout the day, which is what the waxing half moon does.

Why is this different, how is the non rotation compatible with the rotation?
08-04-2017 , 08:09 PM
Also haven't heard any explanations how an objects shadow can travel BACKWARDS.

Although this one is easy to understand:

08-05-2017 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichGangi
The idea of outer space supporting the internet is as weak as the notion that the crescent moon is caused by the earth's shadow, which many people still assume.

The internet is supported by underwater cables. Here's a mainstream media outlet reporting on it:

08-05-2017 , 12:28 AM
Quote:
It's still not an adequate explanation (I watched it previously). It's an explanation of how the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere could see different constellations, but it still doesn't explain how people in the southern hemisphere see the same constellations when they are facing different direction.
Dome

08-05-2017 , 01:34 PM
Moo , could you please name one substance that is strong enough create a dome structure that is 20,000 miles wide at the base and several hundred miles high? Which also, I'm guessing supports the weight of the sun and moon?
08-05-2017 , 04:55 PM
This thread would be way better if people actually responded to each other. I'm obviously not a FE, but am interested in the answers to some of the questions Moo is asking.

      
m