Quote:
If only the defense arguments were available somewhere other than the Friends of Amanda site.
So let me get this straight. You spend 430,000 words arguing all kinds of minutia defending Knox and saying there is no evidence against them. Then when someone is trying to ascertain the truth of a key piece of evidence, I get the following responses from each party:
- Henry links me to both prosecution and defense presentations
- You post vague obfuscatory text hinting that something exists but providing no link
Are you trying to lose this argument, or something? You're doing a great job.
I did my own transparencies and overlays from the trial exhibits and it's clear that Sollecito's foot is an excellent match, while Guede's isn't a credible match. While googling for the link you wouldn't provide, I also came across this which did a more thorough job than my own outlining:
http://perugiamurderfile.net/viewtopic.php?p=95561 (scroll down)
In the images below, Guede's toe is a horrible match for the print, far too narrow, and the metatarsus is too large by quite a margin The are also no toe prints with Guede and his arch forms a broader uniform pattern that has trouble matching the bathmat:
Meanwhile the image is a good fit for Sollecito, with his smaller metatarsus, much larger toe, more graded arched, and very faint toe prints as opposed to the strong ones for Guede:
Given that the print has to be Guede or Sollecito, whose do you think it is?
Have a look at the thread for the outlining done on the bathmat and the high contrast image that more clearly shows the blood, especially to the left of the strong big toe print, which is critical here and establishes the width beyond all doubt.
The only place the images don't fit well is beneath the big toe, which is white in Sollecito's reference print, but that can be explained by the raised plushness of the bathmat beneath this area. You can also see a very faint imprint beneath the toe on his reference footprint indicating it's maybe a mm or two off printing; the raised bathmat would bring that out in full given the strength of the big toe print and lack of other toe prints, indicating the weight was on that side.
So I'll ask a third time: Out of all the millions of words written about this case, is there any analysis like the above that shows it could credibly match Guede's print and is unlikely to match Sollecito's? The below is all I can find and it's a joke compared to the above and fails to establish anything except that a measurement was incorrectly recorded by the prosecution on the image (it is correct in the table above however):
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/footprints-03.html
Last edited by Truthsayer; 04-15-2013 at 08:41 PM.