24 hour Oski-summation/cliffs:


LoL!

Keep it going Oski!!!!

I brought up my guess he went bk over a year ago, long before anyone knew Ken was posting under his real name.

last week he stated he had gone bk.

so, you lose there.

last week, Ken posted his "bio" and I guessed he didn't finish high school.

I don't know if he did or not, but by the way he's answering, I believe he didn't.

so, wrong again.

thanks for playing.

While he's at it I wonder if Oski could dox Henry and list where he received his 9 college degrees.

If you've read Nencini and I haven't, then why did I immediately know you had posted nonsense when you had claimed Nencini had found a post-murder cleanup of Meredith's bedroom was possible:

To make sure you were talking about Nencini, I had asked you:
In addition to a summary of Nencini written by an Italian, I also posted a 'Guilter' translation of Nencini to prove that you were wrong about a post-murder cleanup in Meredith's bedroom:

Your insane rant continues:
Despite your ongoing bluster, I've obviously read Nencini since I immediately recognized that you were claiming things not found in Nencini.

I was RIGHT, you were WRONG! The fact that you can never admit an error is pure Oski. It's also a clear sign of mental illness.

Your ongoing juvenile antics and bullying are further indications that you are mentally unhinged. You clearly need professional help.

You read it - here it is again for you to read:

Here it is again for you to read:

You don't even know what's happening.

If you had any familiarity with this thread, you would understand nothing out of the ordinary has happened, or is happening.

Keep trying.

You need to step up your troll game.

Why don't you ask him yourself?

Anyhow, any word on whether you are going to link me to one of your posts that is even mildly-entertaining? I had high hopes for you, but you really don't deliver.

At this point, I'd even settle for a well-placed or "+1" - just something that indicates you are something above worthless.

Funny how Oski has said about a thousand times that there's nothing new to discuss, while continuing to refer to Henry's mega post as a reliable summary of evidence.

Then when errors in Henry's report are pointed out he says that it's due to the fact that Henry was going off of the information that was available at that time and we know more now.

The information is much better now, but still, everything has already been discussed so there's no reason to discuss it again.

Another is a series of ******ed posts.

1. No material errors in Henry's post have been pointed out. I appreciate that Ken will say so, and I also appreciate that as Ken's biggest fan, you blindly accept what he says. That is fine, but just understand, that means you are a lemming.

2. There is nothing new to discuss. The reference was about the change in the state of information that happened about 18 months ago. The only other change was when the Nencini Report was issued and translated approximately 11 months ago.

So, looks like you continue to shoot blanks.

lol, Jock2thebrain.

That's your opinion.

Yeah, it is my opinion.

No ****.

You said it as a fact.

Cuz it's true. Not one of you have refuted the megapost. So refute the mfr in its 11p entirety instead of blustering like you're blustering in a really blustery manner.

I appreciate that you respect my authority. However, please understand, on subjective matters such as that, my statements are merely opinion.

And so another Oski-day begins…

This thread summed up in a 3 minute video:

Wait, ken dine has followers now?

The first ****ing statement has a major error! LMAO

HE CLAIMS A WITNESS SAW AMANDA LEAVING RAFFAELE'S APARTMENT

(In the very first post of his monstrosity of what is know as his "mega post")

Why go any further when this (the first statement) is so atrocious?

Clearly that was never was true, and at a period in time when anyone who knows the case should not get that wrong (unlike Oski's excuse for his leader).

So, is that a refuted point on his mega post is it not?

Your move.

And if you want to be nitty about it, Raffaeles computer actually had interaction on it up until a certain time so that's a completely disingenuous statement as well regarding no human interaction.

Raffaele's last interaction with his laptop was around 9:30 pm. When Amanda opened the door to greet the Polish gal around 8:40 pm, the gal testified that she saw Amanda working on her laptop, but the police fried Amanda's laptop and then refused to let experts retrieve the data from her fried drive, so Amanda may have been able to prove that she was working on her laptop much later.

By 9:15 pm Meredith was likely already dead since she was murdered still wearing the jacket she walked home wearing when she arrived back at the cottage a few minutes before 9:00 pm.

Further proof that Meredith died nearly immediately upon arriving home, is that she didn't call her ailing mom back, as was her custom. Meredith also never had the chance to remove her wet clothing from the washing machine.

Although Nencini gives the 21:26 Naruto prompt as a human interaction, Sollecito's own expert D'Ambrosio said it wasn't. The cartoon was not downloaded or viewed and it may have been just a new-episode prompt. Massei gives the 21:10 closing of the Amelie file as a human interaction, but the experts said that may have been automatic as well.

No, that was on Popovic's first visit at 17:45 (and she's Serbian). She didn't recall which computer Knox was writing on. When she came back at 20:40 she just spoke to Knox at the door and didn't go in.

Except they didn't. It was already damaged when examined on 13 November, just like Filomena's when the police tried to switch it on on 2 November. A Sollecito defence expert was present on 13 November and didn't object to anything the police did.

Knox defence experts did recover some data from the hard drive, but did not reveal what they found. Unlike the prosecution, they don't have to share.

That light blue top wasn't exactly a heavy winter coat. You could wear it indoors, and the house may not have been that warm.

She'd already had a long conversation with Arline that afternoon. She'd heard how the day's dialysis session went, and they'd discussed a mid-December trip home she was planning. She did sometimes call Arline more than once a day, but the timing of that second, failed call -- immediately after she left Sophie Purton -- suggests she may have been calling just to be on the phone to someone while she walked home alone through a part of town that made her (and Sophie) nervous. And if you just fancy a chat and someone doesn't pick up, you don't necessarily call right back. You might well leave it a while.

It wasn't strictly Meredith's washing, since some of it was Knox's according to Laura and Filomena. That's an odd load. There is no evidence that Meredith loaded the machine herself except for Knox's account (as in her 'alibi email' of 4 November), which is probably misdirection. It is obvious why Knox might need to wash all those towels you can see through the washer's window in the crime-scene pictures, and why she might need to disguise that fact.

Ok. So, it appears that your attempt at refuting the post begins and ends here.

I think it is safe to say that your opinion should then be that AK and RS participated on the murder since you do not take issue with any other portion of the post - you have not controverted anything in the post other than raising an issue with this one witness.

Of course, there is other evidence that suggests AK was out of RS flat such as Curotolo's testimony.

So, you have not effectively countered the post.

Your move.

You aren't being nitty; rather, you are being either disingenuous or ignorant: Your "nitty point" completely ignores that Henry goes on to elaborate on that point later and explain when the human interaction ends on the computer.***

*** Did you know that the post is actually 11 different posts with the first one being a summary? I am only asking because you have demonstrated that you tend to not actually read the materials you are arguing about - here, I don't think you read the entire post, either based on the quoted post.

Guys, Guede in his most unvarnished account admitted to being there well before Meredith got home and said he went inside with her except it was at a time when she wasn't home yet. Her coat was found sleeves, inside out, bloody, and had Guede's DNA on it. Guede also said she screamed so loud it would have been heard from the street at 9:20 or 9:30 which wasn't long after she got home.

But 57 on Red has the whopper that it's a light coat that could have been worn inside so we should probably pay it no mind.