I found Hayano's book entertaining and somewhat instructive. I do wonder how it made it to No 2 though. It doesn't seem the type of book that would sell well outside Nevada or California. The book has historic value and it appears, some things never change, even after more than 30 years:
Quote:
Some younger pros are openly critical of older, conservative players whom they describe as unimaginative, predictable, and mathematically incompetent. Many of the young players cite knowledge of statistics, game theory, and psychology as part of the newer "scientific" and "theoretical" aspects of poker in which older pros are only "intuitively" competent, which condescendingly connotes an inferior skill. Contrasting a younger scientific player with an older, presumably unscientific one, a pro in his early thirties stated: "The player who knows his mathematics, psychology, and can read and intimidate others is what I mean by a scientific player. That player is just overkill against some of the older players. It's not even close even though the older players have 100,000 hours at the table."
Quote:
Originally Posted by avatar77
Regarding Mathematics of Poker, what percentage of people purchased this book actually read and understand it? That book is way beyond 97% or more general players
Let's put it this way: without MoP, the Intelligent Poker Player, Applications of no limit hold'em and Expert HUNL would have propbably never been written if MoP had never been published. From my point of view, it should be in the top 2.